Preview

Democracy Vs Totalitarianism Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy Vs Totalitarianism Essay
A Political System has two segments, Democracy and Totalitarianism. Democracy is usually practiced in Western and Northern European countries. It gives the citizens the freedom and the rights to vote for multiple political officials, in which they feel that would be an advocate and help serve the needs of the people, the states, and the country. Some of these officials are voting in twice by the citizens, but there are time frames and limitations that a Politian can hold his or her sit in office. This gives other potential politics an opportunity to run for office in government, According to Doh and Luthans (2012) “Essentially, every citizen should be involved in decision-making processes. The representative government ensures individual freedom since anyone who is eligible may have a voice in the choices made (Doh & Luthans, p. 40).” Countries that practice such political system are allowing the voices of their citizens to be heard and made. However, Totalitarianism is indifferent from Democracy. The political system is ran …show more content…
This is the only system that I will consider. I feel that no one man should be given that much power and authority to make an entire countries life decisions and choices for competent adults. However, I do agree with ethical laws, laws, rules, freedom, and freedom of speech. I feel that there should be consequences if these rules and laws are not followed. Totalitarianism guidelines give their citizens has no equality and freedom of speech, because their citizens voices can never be heard. There is a lack of freedom but a sense of fear of man. These people have a fear of being tortured because their opinions are indifferent from one man. I feel that this is immoral and unethical. I would definitely make changes in these types policies and political systems. I would let the citizens make there of decision and do what’s best for the betterment of themselves and their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the past, people have experienced a type of government that centered all its power, authority, policies, rules, and regulations on the mighty and vigor of a dictator. A dictator is a person who solely runs the nation with a single government that rules every land and every freedom of the people as human beings and citizens of the country. During the World Wars, dictators such as Adolf Hitler of Germany, Benito Mussolini of Italy, and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union were the center for abolishment and annihilate their totalitarian regimes that have destroyed millions of lives and homes from different parts of the world (“Totalitarian Regimes”). However, despite the destruction of totalitarianism government, there are still totalitarian practices that are evident within the modern government of democracy and independence. Accordingly, this paper will recognize and discuss the origins of totalitarianism in order to compare and contrast some apparent manifestations of modern totalitarianism. Moreover, this paper will also identify some key points of evidences that modern totalitarianism is present in the current structure of democracy especially in the United States.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Essay On Tyranny

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tyranny. Something that has torn apart nations and civilizations for centuries. No wonder our founding fathers worked so hard to inhibit it. James Madison, the father of the constitution, wrote that power in the hands of one, few, or many is the definition of tyranny. The existing constitution, The Articles of Confederation, was not working for the young America. There was no chief executive, judicial system, or a central government to unite the states. After just separating from a tyrant king, the framers of our constitution wanted to create a strong defense against tyranny. The systems protecting our government against tyranny is federalism, separation of powers, and balance of powers.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In other words, the votes of some are 15 times more powerful than the votes of others. Loenen makes note that the purpose (of the right to vote) cannot be less than to guarantee to citizens their full democratic rights in the government of the country and the provinces” (Loenen, 1997). He also mentions that such a fundamental right must not be diluted for some citizens by giving greater weight to the vote of others (Loenen, 1997). The court seems to be unaware that plurality electoral system regularly produces majority governments from a minority of the…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is totalitarianism? Totalitarianism is a form of government in which the government completely reminisced one’s individuality and freedom. In Aldous Huxley’s novel, “Brave New World,” totalitarianism is perfectly demonstrated in which humans are scientifically made and have no control over their desired purpose on earth. Totalitarianism is also seen in George Orwell’s novel, “1984,” where the government has eyes on everything. This means there is no privacy what so ever. The uncontrolled power of the state will destroy a community and lead to total disaster.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarian governments control every aspect of a citizen's life. The totalitarian government in 1984 by George Orwell is similar to governments in today's society, like North Korea. Both control citizens by dumbing them down, executing the ones who disobey, and having every move planned.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system is based on public will, there will be little to chance of public revolt, representatives conduct state affairs with public support. This is part of democracy for the better because we need change in revolution. We care to understand this because how much democracy puts up and deals with all the different changes they make. Democracy often functions with consensus, so the question of revolution would not rise. This is important because if we did not have public will this type of government would not be a good government. This is something to worry about if people are under this government, people need to have public will. This is not what all people have to say about the government system of…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government, a republic under democratic ideals, is supposed to represent the people. Yet what is truly being represented, shown in the policies in tax reductions and various other policies, is the rich. Just one of the top 10 most richest people in America have more money than 300 thousand of the lowest people put together. People are so distracted by other things, like racism, the gay marriage laws that were passed, and all these social issues that they don’t see one of the main problems at hand. Because of this “U.S government policies reflect the desires of the wealthy and interest groups more than the average citizen, according to researchers at Princeton University and Northwestern University” (Bondoli 1). Why? A democratic society has the most power in the people as a whole.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Feuer, Lois. "The calculus of love and nightmare: The Handmaid 's Tale and the dystopian tradition." Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction v38n2(1997): 83-95.…

    • 2893 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the political scientist Carl Friedrich, a totalitarian regime is distinguished by the following characteristics: a powerful ideology, which promised the onset of a golden era; a single mass-based party, led by a charismatic dictator; a system of terror, built around a ruthless secret police force; and the centralised control of the economy, the mass media and the armed forces.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most effective form of government in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is Absolutism. Absolutism was the most effective form of government according to King James I of England in 1609, King Louis XIV of France in 1660, and Machiavelli the prince in 1513. King James I believed absolutism was the best form of government because the King deserves divine power over the kingdom or empire. King Louis XIV believed that absolutism was the most effective because he believed the more you offer the people the more they take it for granted. Machiavelli believes that a king should rule this way because regular men are deceitful and fickle. Absolutism was the better form of government in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is a land of opportunity, social and economic mobility, equality, and continual progress toward its ideals of liberty and justice. Everyone can achieve socioeconomic advancement through hard work and everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. According to this view, the colonists in North America had abundant opportunities for success because of cheap and widely available land, and they eventually threw off the yoke of the British constitutional monarchy. Driven by their hatred of tyranny and love of freedom, the Founding Fathers established the Constitution, which cemented the principles of democracy and laid the foundation for a prosperous and fair society. Since the founding of the Republic, Americans have overcome injustice, such as the enslavement of African Americans and the relegation of women to the status of second-class citizens, and built an economy that has dominated global markets, which provides the means to have a high quality of life. In addition, this view of American history holds that the U.S. has been a force for good in the world in terms of its involvement in international affairs, whether it be winning WWII or ending communism's reign in Eastern Europe, thus creating a brighter future for humanity.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “To make democracy work, we must be a nation of participants, not simply observers. One who does not vote has no right to complain” (L’Amor 5). By writing this, the famous western novelist, Louis L’Amor explains that the backbone of democratic process depends the citizens to vote. A responsibility decides representatives as well as diplomatic viewpoints. Corruption, on the other hand leaves citizens not properly represented. This has led supporters to stress the importance of keeping our elections clean, however critics of regulation such as voter identification laws acclaim that heavy regulation causes a skewed turnout in minorities voters.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SEN – democracy is a universal value (accepted worldwide)…not whether or not you have the right condition, it can work anywhere! Dispels the economics first notion – yes some auth regimes have been fast growing but it can go either way…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarian Essay

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Germany, Italy, and the Soviet Union. The totalitarian regimes of the 1920’s-1930’s. These regimes, although in different areas, shared a common goal; total control. In order to achieve this these regimes would need to gain the support of the people. Adolf Hitler was said, “Burn into the little man’s soul the proud conviction that though a little worm, he is nonetheless part of a great dragon.” I believe these regimes accomplished Hitler’s goal in this quote by using techniques; some different and some similar.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    THE CENTRAL PROPOSITION OF MODERN DEMOCRATIC THEORY is that repeated elections function as a mechanism of accountability. The underlying logic behind this claim is simple: if politicians want to be re-elected and if voters condition their ballots on policy outcomes, then politicians have an incentive to implement policies that benefit the electorate. Otherwise, they lose in electoral competition. This argument is intuitive and well-known, but is it empirically valid? Does the system of repeated elections function as a mechanism of political control? This question is particularly interesting in the case of the new post-communist democracies because electoral competition in these countries takes place in the context of unstable party systems and, in some cases, under constitutional arrangements obscuring political responsibility. Among new democracies, Russia stands out as one of the most dubious cases for democratic responsibility. It is often argued that, although formal democratic institutions exist in this post-communist country, their de facto functions are different from those performed in established liberal democracies. In Russia, where formal democratic institutions do not have deep roots in cultural attitudes and historical traditions, one would expect that politicians will be unlikely to care for the needs and welfare of their electorate. Given Russia’s long history of politics as a zero-sum game in which the losing party was usually exterminated, its revolutionary tradition, and the increasingly authoritarian features of current politics, adherence to democratic rules of the game can be interpreted as a pact on the part of the competing elites that secures their long-term survival and political influence. Russia’s…

    • 12765 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Powerful Essays