Democracy Vs Presidential Democracy

Better Essays
Thus, the Presidential system follows a track to democracy by giving the people the change to have a right in saying and choosing what they find best for their nation. However, in a parliamentary system the ideas are different. Its track to democracy is attempted when the people are included in the parliament and the power of implementing policies is not just restricted to one person. Also, the systems have in common the fact that they depend on legislature, which helps the systems to execute and implement laws. Providing real life examples of countries and their running of the systems, will help evaluate to what extent these countries fit in the path of democracy and how their ideas are applied in reality. Before discussing the argument, …show more content…
Second, in the contemporary time frame, there must be about general grown-ups right to vote. As of not long ago, this was far from being true since a few countries that were generally considered popular governments avoided a huge part of the grown-up population (e.g., Switzerland rejected ladies), but this does not occur anymore. Next, there must be assurances of civil rights, for example, the right to speak freely, opportunity of association, due procedure of law, and so on. (Mainwaring, 1990) A presidential democracy has only two features. Firstly, the head of government is independently chosen by legislature because the elections and the post elections discussions do not bring executive power. If the chief executive is chosen by the legislature, the system becomes parliamentary and not presidential. Coming to the presidential system, the president is specifically chosen and his or her official power is adjusted by a lawmaking body that is independent of the president since it, as well, is chosen and elected. The president, alone among every one of the authorities of the state, has general duty regarding open decisions of hiring officials. He or she may choose priests or cabinet …show more content…
The nature of parliamentary rule governments depends, to a vast degree, on the responsibility of the official. Researchers place the light on the parliament's part in making and breaking governments, concentrating on the arrangement and disintegration of governments, the allotment of cabinet portfolios, and cabinet term. In contrast with the presidential system, the official is not specifically chosen but rather normally rises or is drawn from the chosen parliament and, not at all like a straightforwardly chosen president. This type of parliamentary official normally comprises of an executive and a board of ministers. The cabinet or assembly is the executive official body. Generally the pioneers of the biggest party in the assembly, or the governing inside it, take the official offices (executive). Not at all like presidents, who are the main authorities with general obligations regarding government undertakings, parliamentary officials should share duties with the members. This implies that the cabinet, with the prime minister, is together in charge of the considerable number of activities of the legislature, and the head administrator, subsequently, is just first among equals. Truth be told, prime ministers in numerous nations have obtained more power than this. The principle components of a parliamentary system, along these lines, are: a straightforwardly chosen administrative body, a mix of executive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a president who serves as both head of state and head of government.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A nation’s choice of government defines how the nation’s executive, legislative and judicial branches are to be arranged. All nation –state require some sort of government to avoid lawlessness. Democratic governments are those that allow citizens of nations equal say in how their government are manages either directly or through elected representatives. Two of the most popular types of democratic governments are presidential and parliamentary systems. These two forms of government are completely different from authoritative types of government that stop or limit the direct participation of citizens. Yet which form of government organization is the best, what are their distinct…

    • 3062 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    III. Is Representative Democracy Best?A. For a representative democracy government to work their must be:i. A opportunity for genuine leadership competition1. individuals and parties be able to run for office2. free communication 3. voters perceive that meaningful choices existii. Guidelines for fair leadership campaigns.B. Framers of the constitution -i. Thought that representative democracy was best because -1. less chances of it offices being manipulated2. help prevent political offices being used for private gain3. reduce the need for constant pollsii. Set up government to protect -1. Civil rights of all people2. Minorities 3. From concentration placement of power. IV. How is Power Distributed in a Democracy?A. Elitei. Persons who possess…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The basic principles of a democratic government include; the rule of law that nobody and no authority is higher than the law of the land, all fundamental rights such as freedom of speech and expressions, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of assembly and civil liberties are assured and guaranteed to all citizens in the country, citizens rights cannot be infringed upon by anybody. independence of the judiciary, seperation of powers and check and balances of all the public authorities, transparency of the government to the citizens about its functions and programmes, periodic free and fair elections to be conducted by an independent electoral body, recognition that citizens have a right and a responsibility to play a part in government and in social community, a multiple political system with equality of opportunities, opinion, ideas and prospects that will benefit all the…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidential Democracy – head of government and head of state = president, elected separately and independently of the legislative branch, president is limited by legislature and judicial  all equal and have checks and balances, legislative Congress = Senate > House…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two main types of political systems, one being a presidential system and the other being a parliamentary system. Both of them have their own benefits as well as their own disadvantages. No political system can be perfect or can always have stability, but shown in history there are successful countries that use either one. Also there are countries that have failed with one of the two systems.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to presidential systems, in parliamentary systems power is concentrated. There is no real head of state.Peole are nominated for the figure. Indeed, it is whether a monarch or a weak president. Power belongs to the Prime minister. Voters…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inna files

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And Parliamentary is a concept that I feel is right as the Indonesian system. Why ? Because in running a government that should be the barometer is not who the president or leader of his country , but its fundamental basis . My assumption going in a presidential system the president's powers overlap than as head of state as well as head of government , this resulting in instability and performance superiority that gave rise to the ' addictive power '. In addition , printed clearly on the 4th Sila , " Democracy guided by the wisdom in deliberation representation " . This clearly illustrates that the state administration was done by consensus , which means that the cabinet is necessary to have a high position that the Assembly or Parliament as the representative body of the people have a vital role in every policy and political direction of the country , not just as a formality institutional.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The author claims that president with limited political power should appointed by the prime minister and an opposition leader, and confirmed by majority of the parliament member as Australia does. In this case the author does not highlight is it better for one party system or multi-party system countries. In the first case, selecting the head of the state is doubtful without opposition and popular vote. It may involve to the biased action of the party to appoint its representor. In the second case, it depends on collaboration of the parties and political literacy of the party…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general terms of democracy today, mostly stated that every people in a country are involves in the decision-making. Another provocative meaning of it is “the rule of the people”. People become so eager to enter government’s area because they concern about the decision affecting their life, and they cannot merely trust someone who not knowing them well. It then forming motion of no confidence between people and their leader and finally creates a democratic movement. There are lots of reasons that muster the motion, 2 of them that often appears are first, power tend to corrupt. The human ego evokes power dispute results in unstable law and decrees like the Supersemar letter and sudden Gusdur’s retreating from presidential chair which was creating “frenziness” inside nation. It also provokes corruption, collusion, and nepotism. Secondly, the diversity between government’s and people’s way of thinking, in a certain case like the latest hot topic, university students demoing the rector’s decision of raising the school fee. Somehow, since the beginning of the leadership people have been eagerly seeking an understanding and trustable leader.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role of Opposition

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The parliamentary system of government works very smoothly where there are two principal political parties, more or less equally matched, the one out of power ever ready to take over the reins of the administration whenever the majority…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament Vs President

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Presidential and parliamentary government systems are two main forms of democratic political systems and executive-legislative relations. Both hold advantages, disadvantages and similarities. With fluctuating stability, both systems of government have had their share of prosperity, with the ability to maintain.…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy vs Dictatorship

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democracy in any country is based on principle of representation. The legislature is attended by…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays