Preview

Delinquency In The 1920's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
953 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Delinquency In The 1920's
Juvenile Justice
Chapter 5 Assignment
Cristian Contreras

Shaw and McKay’s developed their own theory in the 1920s; this was one of the first attempts to focus on the social conditions that lead to delinquency. They wanted to explain why juvenile crime rates were so high in areas of a city characterized by urban decay. Why was there increased delinquency in the zone in transition? There were three characteristics of interstitial areas identified by Shaw McKay: cultural heterogeneity, mobility, and poverty. In the 1920s, a big number of immigrants from many countries came to the United States and regularly lived in the zone in transition where housing was cheapest. So this means there was a large number of cultures that lived which in other
…show more content…
There are three distinct types of gangs that might form in neighborhoods: criminal gangs, conflict gangs, and retreatist gangs. Criminal gangs exist in organized communities in which younger offenders can gain the necessary knowledge and skills to be successful criminals from older offenders. These gangs are likely to commit crimes such as drug dealing, commercial theft burglary, and other crimes with an economic motive. Conflict gangs don’t have the access to these illegitimate opportunity structures to obtain their goals. These gangs are highly disorganized; there are no adult criminal role models to tutor these youths. Most of the crime these gangs do is individualistic and unorganized. These people may do crazy acts of violence out of anger and frustration. Retreatist gangs may exist in neighborhoods that either do or do not have illegitimate opportunity structures, or they may not have access to those structures. These gangs sell small amounts of drugs. Criminal and Retreatist gangs sell drugs. Conflict and Retreatist gangs do poorly …show more content…
Here are nine formal propositions that demonstrate that social interaction and learning lead to delinquency. The first one is criminal behavior is learned. Sutherland said delinquency is a function of learning. The second one is criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons in a process of communication. The third one is intimate personal groups is the principal part of the learning of criminal behavior. So you can learn delinquent behavior from families such as parents. The fourth one is when you do criminal behavior; you learn the techniques of committing the crime, specific directions of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes. The fifth one is the specific direction of motives and drives is leaned from definitions of the legal codes as favorable or unfavorable. The sixth one is a person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of the law over definitions unfavorable to violation of the law. A favorable definition happens when a youth is exposed to ideas or behaviors that are deviant. When a juvenile is associating with others, he has obtained more definitions that are favorable to the violation of the law than are unfavorable, and then delinquency is likely to occur. The seventh is differential associations may vary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two theories I decided to compare and contrast are Social bonding theory and Social learning theory. Although both are quite similar they both have distinct methods and beliefs in how criminal behavior and activity is developed. Social Bonding theory extracted from the Social Control theory is how an individual is brought and developed into society and how it’s ties to external factors contribute to how the individuals delinquent behavior. Social Learning theory occurs when the individual views a modeled behavior that they value, observes an act if the model has a role model or admired status, and imitates the learned behavior. In this I will explain in detail how both theories work and what similarities and differences these theories…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Presently, youths and adolescent teens have become progressively enticed to join gangs. An individual joining a gang or a non-criminal group consists of different pushes and pulls that work in tandem to represent an attraction or dominating force. In this case, for example, “gang membership can increase status among peers, especially girls (for boys)” while also allowing the opportunity to be with them (Why Do Youth Join Gangs?). Gangs also provide a sense of excitement through illicit drug selling and the ability to earn money. By committing these illicit acts, youths perceive themselves making a rational choice in their decision to join a gang. It is assumed candidates for gangs are already delinquent or have a high probability for delinquency…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although, it is unlikely that this approach would hold true for explaining why an adult with no background of juvenile delinquency would suddenly be involved in adult crime organizations. Members of criminal organizations will vary in age but “it is rare that one joins or begins criminal associations as an adult” and that the majority of “gang membership begins during youth and adolescence” (Britz et al., 2006, p. 16). However, there are some flaws in the applicability of Sutherland’s theory for explaining why people become involved in criminal gangs. One such flaw is the claim that one is deviant through the “excess of deviant over conventional contacts” (Thio, 2010, p. 24). It fails to explain why some people who are surrounded by nondeviant influences become deviant and for people who are surrounded by deviance never engage in deviant behavior. The theory analyzes how a person could learn from his or her surroundings but fails to explain “the reasons for why they make delinquent choices” (Church et al., 2009, p. 11). A better explanation of how deviance occurs is through…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A study interviewed teenagers (aged 10-19) in Chicago and reported that “75% had witnessed a robbery, stabbing, shooting, and/or killing. 45% had witnessed more than one violent incident.” With this chronic violence in these communities coupled with the fear of gang members, it is no wonder why the youth join gangs. With gang membership, individuals are apart of a group that protects one another. Therefore, gangs are a natural adaptation to the environment they are surrounded by and garner power from the ability to recruit members. Their own terrifying image using physical items (clothing, accessories, and/or tattoos) create an image of power. Evidence has shown “recruitment tactics include… fear/intimidation, especially when children live in gang-infested neighborhoods.” Gangs target youth in these areas because they are vulnerable because of their current situation. They offer them safety, a family, and protection, something their own family and community cannot provide. The ability to successfully recruit members is proof of their dominance and validates their physical image. However, there are other ways used to recruit potential…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Relationship between Delinquency and Drug UseIn my attempt to discover if delinquency and drug use, or the sale of drugs were correlated with one another, my research lead to a positive correlation, especially when there was gang membership involved. The theory I have chosen to tie in with my review of the articles I found is the social learning theory of Edwin Sutherland known as differential association theory. According to Britannica online, Sutherland 's differential association theory of delinquent behavior is learned from other persons who are also engaged in delinquent behaviors. Sutherland believes that a person becomes delinquent because of an access amount of exposure to the definitions of criminal behavior and the violation of the law (Britannica 2007). This particular belief is a good theory to use to explain juvenile delinquency. Orcutt (1983) explains that Sutherland states that everyone has social groups which influence each of us in the actions that we chose to engage in according to the norms and values of that group. An example would be that most of our parents teach us that we should respect and obey the law. However, there are those that some people are associated with inside their social network that influence in negative ways, tempting and leading others into deviant behavior. Such as assuring those within a group that certain drugs should not be criminalized and that the chance of getting caught with them is very slim. With enough pressure and continued exposure to that mindset and behavior pattern, an individual whom has not been engaged in certain illegal behaviors becomes involved with those activities that promote the illegal and delinquent behaviors. The behavior referred to in this paper is the use or selling of drugs and its connection with juvenile delinquency and gangs. According to Orcutt (1983), Sutherland does point out that learning of social norms and values does not come from the mass population but for one 's own intimate…

    • 1995 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gangs Research Paper

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Researchers used federal data in estimating that in 2009, “there are approximately one million gang members [in the United States]. (“Gangs Timeline.” n.p.). A million is way too high of a number, and since researchers made that estimate, the number of Americans in gangs has surely grown. The United States is caught in a downward spiral heading towards gangs having complete control of not only the inner cities, but the expansion of gangs makes the threat of gang violence in American suburbia a likely part of the future if something is not done to stop it. The solution to the skyrocketing gang problem is not through harsher penalties against gang crimes since it has not worked, it is through social service and community outreach programs to show gang members that there is a viable way out and to stop the problem from occurring in the first place.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1920"s Crime

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of the organized crime related activates began due to the newest amendment the eighteenth amendment which was the prohibition of alcohol. In January nineteen twenty the manufacturing and distribution of alcohol illegal. All in hopes of seizing violence and drunkenness. Needless to say it did the exact opposite … and the some. With to world in economic decline and many people out of work people saw this new “law” as an opportunity. Criminal opportunity. Everything that prohibition was suppose to fix got way way way worse. Arrests for prohibition violations had increased 102%. Arrests for drunkenness and drunken or disorderly conduct had increased 41%. Arrests for drunken drivers increased 81%. Thefts and burglaries increased 9%. Homicides as well as assault and battery charges increased 13%. The number of federal convicts increased 561%. The federal prison population increased 366%. The total federal expenditures on penal institutions increased 1,000%. And police funding increased 11.4 million dollars.(William A. Merideth, the great experiment.) In fact a new police force was created just for this. It was called the federal prohibition bureau. With all the police and newly formed organizations as well as the FBI only 5% of the alcohol in the U.S. was being confiscated.(Tim Nash, 20th century crime) unemployment grew as well as violence and jobs in crime. The main reason the unemployment rates were so high was mostly due to the fact everyone who worked in a bar, distillery, liquor store, winery and vineyard was now unemployed. Police recourses on preventing other crimes have now been diverted to prohibition causes. Thus letting more crimes of different varieties happen. With the law completely and utterly inferior gangs fought amongst themselves to gain control of distribution territories. Many people wanted to get in on this new and thriving source of seemingly endless revenue by making their own alcohol in their own homes and elsewhere. Most of the new people…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Our initial step is to examine a fundamental theory on the emergence of crime, differential association. The theory of differential association is one of the oldest theories on crime. The fundamental assumption of this theory is the principle of differential association which reads: ‘A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to the violation of the law over definitions unfavorable to the violation of the law'. Sutherland comments upon this principle in the following manner: ‘It refers to both criminal and anti-criminal associations and has to do with counteracting forces. When persons become criminals, they do so because of contacts with criminal patterns and also because of isolation away from anti-criminal patterns' (Opp, 1989)."…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Robert Agnew (2015), delinquency is learned through interaction and communication with others rather than a biological reason. This theory is a learning process that involves all of the mechanisms a child would utilize in order to learn either delinquent or non-delinquent behavior. Overall, Sutherland’s theory supports the fact that people usually obtain knowledge through nurture rather than nature. According to Sutherland, when a child is born, he or she doesn’t possess any desire to engage in delinquent acts. What makes the child commit these acts of delinquency, originates from the influence of their surrounding peers. If the child’s friends are committing illegal acts, then there is a high chance that particular association will result in the child committing the same exact delinquent…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Youth Gangs

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These young gangs have long been present in the United States, but were previously only in large urban centers. This changed dramatically in the late 1980s (Miller, 1980), when youth gangs started to appear in smaller cities and suburban areas across the United States along with a rapid rise in their numbers and membership (Miller,…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cloward, Richard A., and Lloyd E. Ohlin. (1960). ‘ Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs’. Vol. 90559. New York: Free Press.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Gangs

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Violent crimes committed by juveniles are not diminishing, as other crimes, as reported by the Justice Department statistics, are (Siegel and Welsh, 2011).” We see that juveniles have more access, and more use of the weapons of violence, including gang affiliation. So why do young people join gangs? First of all, the gang members are minorities of Hispanic, African-American, and Asian. “There are two basic reasons for a young disadvantaged youth to join a gang: protection, and a sense of the "family" which he does not have at home- assuming he still has a home to call his (Siegel and Welsh, 2011).” While these two basic reasons are true both on the streets and in prison, the protection aspect is certainly far more important in jails.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal behavior

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The systematics of the theory of Sutherland: “Criminal behavior as learned through contact with other with a law-violating orientation” This theory applies to both conventional and white collar crimes. Sutherland formulated a list of nine interrelated proposition on the process and content of learning to be a criminal (Friedrichs: P.235-236). These are the following: 1) Criminal behavior is learned, 2) Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons in a process of communication, 3) The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups, 4) When criminal behavior is learned, the learning includes (a) techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very simple; (b) the specific direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes. 5) The specific direction of the motives and drives is learned from definitions of the legal codes as favorable or unfavorable, 6) A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of law over definitions unfavorable to violation of law. 7) Differential association may vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity. 8) The process of learning criminal behavior by association with criminal and anti-criminal patterns involves all of the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning. 9) While criminal behavior is an expression of general needs and values, it is not explained by those general needs and values, since noncriminal behavior is an expression of the same needs and values. This association with criminal groups or non-criminal, different, differentiated or…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Huff, Ronald C., 1998, Comparing the Criminal Behavior of Youth Gangs and At-Risk Youth, National Institute of Justice, Washington D.C. Retrieved July 24, 2010…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard the saying “Watch who you hang around”? That saying is implying that you become more like the people you’re around on a daily basis so try to surround yourself with good folks. Other things such as the media also influence criminal behavior, “today, we would need to add the fact that criminal behavior can also be learned through television, songs, and especially the internet” (193). The textbook is saying that you don’t need to have personal relationships with future criminals due to all the influence through the media today. This is a difference between the article but it is one out of a limited number of differences. Sutherland also talks about explanations of criminal behavior and statistics and he goes on to mention that they are inadequate due to the fact that the samples that were used were biased. “Criminal behavior of persons not in the lower class” (2) is not included in the samples which makes them biased. The article and the textbook have a few differences but overall Sutherland’s article in 1940 is still really relevant to the modern world's…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays