Preview

Dehumanization Of Government In 1984, By George Orwell

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dehumanization Of Government In 1984, By George Orwell
When one thinks of oppressive governments, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime, Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union, and Mao Zedong’s Communist China come to mind. These draconian regimes resulted in millions of deaths and the dehumanization of people. These governments took away the rights of its citizens, and made live unbearable. George Orwell, a satirist, comments on oppressive governments, such as Hitler’s, Stalin’s, and Zedong’s. Orwell comments on these governments through many of his works, namely his novel 1984. 1984 focuses on a man named Winston Smith, who is a propagandist inside the Party, or the ruling government. The Party is an oppressive government and as a result Winston disagrees with its beliefs and rebels. He finds others revolutionaries …show more content…
In 1984, the language is called Newspeak, and it is essentially a dialect of English. Big Brother sees language as a way to further his control and limit thought. Syme states, “Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten” (52). Language is an aspect of individuality, each person has different writing and speaking styles and tones. Also using different words maintains individuality, but when there are a small amount of words thought is limited. The Party does not want people to think, and as a result they eliminate autonomy, which is horrible. This is exactly what the Party wants, they do not want individuality. Individuality threatens the regime, but when people have conformed it is much easier to control them. The United States is similar to 1984 through the use of language, as in the U.S. it is also limited. Newspeak is essentially the same as how people text on their phones and talk to each other. In the U.S. people text, LOL, rather than texting laugh out loud, or that something was funny. Furthermore people use emoticons, called Emojis to express their feelings. People text these abbreviations, and Emojis mainly due to laziness. The harmful part, is that dictionaries, including Merriam-Webster have started to put these abbreviations in their dictionaries. This means that intellectuals are supporting this laziness and conformity. This gives the regime much more power. People are limited to Emojis for responses, which promotes laziness and therefore ignorance. Once people are ignorant they accept oppressive regimes and anything for the truth. The constant war that Oceania is in furthers Big

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In both 'The Handmaid's Tale' and '1984', language is obviously used as a form of state control, enabling dystopian leaders to remain in power by manipulating language to restrict free thought. People are consequently politically unaware and unable to rebel against them. This is done in '1984' through using 'Newspeak', a reduced version of today's Standard English, or 'Oldspeak'. As the Oceanian powers have omitted words from people's vocabulary they are unable to speak words The Party deems unsuitable or create unorthodox thoughts. This makes all modes of thought impossible, except those agreeing with The Party's principles. Winston Smith's conversation with Syme demonstrates this: "Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan "Freedom is Slavery" When the concept of freedom has been abolished." If The Party fulfilled its aims, abolishing further words such as 'freedom', citizens would become ignorant that they had ever possessed 'freedom'; would not want freedom from the regime, and would not rebel against it, giving Big Brother total control.…

    • 3503 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In George Orwell’s novel 1984 and in modern society, language is manipulated to benefit those desiring power. Power seeking individuals understand that language is the ultimate weapon due to its common use to communicate throughout cultures. The power that language holds allows it to be capable of being abused and misused. The Party, in 1984, realizes the potential power of language and uses that as its main tool to corrupt the conscience mind.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oppression In 1984

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The novel 1984 by George Orwell highlights how the government uses multiple different tools in order to oppress their citizens, one of them being grammar and language. The concept of “Newspeak” is made to completely erase the ability to form rebellious and contrasting ideologies to the Party. The ultimate goal of Newspeak is to ensure even the possibility of rebellious thought is impossible since there are no words to formulate it. By forcing Newspeak on Oceania, the Party silences their subjects in order to maintain complete and utter control over them. Disregarding the risks of speaking out against the Party, the people of Oceania do not even have the ability to think for themselves Their words…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Symbolism in 1984

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The language in 1984 is symbolic of the Party 's manipulation of its members. The development of Newspeak, although seeming to improve the civilization, depletes thought, creativity, and individualism in its speakers. This represents the Party 's main goal of brainwashing and taking complete control. The terms used for everyday objects are again ironic and symbolic of manipulation by Big Brother. The word Party suggests that it is familiar and fun, even though it is oppressive. Victory Gin, Victory Coffee, and Victory Cigarettes are truly low-quality. The Party uses these terms in an attempt to attract members and distort their thoughts. Even the term Big Brother blurs reality.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Meaning

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. The greatest danger is that, as in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, doublespeak will lead to the “control of reality through language” (par. 23).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1984 language has been manipulated to remove the possibility of rebellious thoughts. The corrupt government creates Newspeak and makes it the official language of Oceania. It is designed to make the ideological premise of Ingsoc the only expressible doctrine. Although it is very similar to English, the the vocabulary and grammar have been greatly reduced and simplified. In the novel, the totalitarian aim of the Party is to prevent any alternative thinking, referred to as "thoughtcrime". By destroying any vocabulary that expresses concepts like freedom, individualism, resistance to the authority of the state and the like, The Party is successfully able to monitor the thoughts of their people. In this language, words with negative meanings are removed as redundant, so "bad" becomes "ungood". Words with comparative and superlative meanings are also simplified, so "better" becomes "gooder", and "best" becomes "goodest". Intensifiers can be added, so "great" becomes "plusgood", and "excellent" and "splendid" become "doubleplusgood". The goal of exchanging English, or “Oldspeak”, for “Newspeak” is to reinforce the total dominance of the state. Syme, a coworker of Winston, says, “It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words” (Orwell 51). The people do not understand how serious the destruction of words is. He says it is “beautiful” yet it is devastating. If…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “1984” a spine chilling, eerie novel written by George Orwell, highlights many key elements throughout the book that send shivers down my entire body. Reading the book, for me the most disconcerting aspect was the fact that the controlling Government and the ominous figure of Big Brother was suppressing freedom of speech and changing the words of the English language. They could do this by erasing history to match what was currently happening, something the main protagonist, Winston, did as his job. By getting rid of certain words, punishing people who used them and not teaching them to new generations, the Government created a new language that people were forced to use called Newspeak. The idea that the past…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living in a society with limited freedom of expression is not, in any case, enjoyable. A Totalitarian society is a good example of such a society, because although it provides control for the people, it can deny them a great deal of freedom to express themselves. The fictional society in George Orwell's 1984 also stands as a metaphor for a Totalitarian society. Communication, personal beliefs, and individual loyalty to the government are all controlled by the inner party which governs the people of Oceania in order to keep them from rebelling. Current society in America is much more democratic. It contrasts with Orwell's society of 1984 because communication, personal beliefs and the people's loyalty to the government are all determined by the individual.<br><br>In order to keep the people of Oceania in conformity with the desires of the governing Inner Party, the Inner Party controls several aspects of the people's lives. Communication, for one, is controlled for the benefit of the nation. Newspeak is a modified version of language that is enforced upon the people in order to limit their expression. Syme and Winston, two middle-class workers in Oceania, discuss the concept of Newspeak. Syme reveals that he supports the system, demonstrating how he has been brainwashed by the Inner Party who enforces the system. "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words... You haven't a real appreciation for Newspeak, Winston... Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thougtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. (p. 46)"<br><br>One can detect from this quotation that the people of Oceania, as a group, have been brainwashed by the Inner Party to use only Newspeak. Syme, for one, understands the purpose of it, and he still complies with the system because he has been trained to do so. The concept of Newspeak is designed to control personal beliefs of the citizens by…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly seventy years after its publication, George Orwell’s “Nineteen eighty-four” endures as a greatly influential novel, responsible for the advent and popularization of many terms and concepts associated with its bleak and totalitarian “Orwellian” world. Orwell’s “Newspeak” stands out as a notably furtive and indirect method of thought control -- a constructed language slowly stripped of all words that could possibly be connected, explicitly or implicitly, to any rebellious or complex thought. The adoption of newspeak into society comes with the elimination of language’s nuance, and subsequently a heavily regulated and unsophisticated mode of thought. But would such a language work in the real world -- does our vocabulary really have that…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oppression In Metropolis

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The purpose of Newspeak is to simply language so much that it is not possible to think a rebellious thought, because there are no words for it. “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought” this quotes shows the Party’s final intention is to limit language so that no citizens could possibly rebel or think about rebelling against the Party. Language is not often thought of as something that can affect a person’s thoughts. However, an explanation of Newspeak soon reveals otherwise, which alarms readers as they believe that thoughts can not be controlled. This is especially true at the end of the novel where in a juxtaposition to his beginning thoughts Winston and the readers learn that the Party manipulate their citizens into loving Big Brother. Therefore, the control of language creates a way for the Party to oppress the citizens of Oceania because it limits the thoughts that they can think and that shocks…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell illustrates this by showing the power Newspeak has over the people's perception of the past and present by manipulating the meanings of the words and changing history and news. Finally, Orwell mainly wrote 1984 to warn about the dangers of a totalitarian government, and the Party creating Newspeak to control its people was part of that warning. However, while there are countless ways that language is changing in the modern day, from abbreviations to slang, these changes are due to the inevitable evolution of language. In conclusion, George Orwell’s book 1984 shows the effect language has on one’s ability to express their opinions and…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel “Nineteen Eighty-Four” George Orwell created the dystopian society of Oceania, where the government has complete control of the language used by citizens. Aside from individuals of lower social class called the “Proles,” the “Party” constantly watches everyone. In an attempt to eliminate any chances of rebellion against the Party, they created the new language of “Newspeak.” Newspeak eliminates any controversial words along with all synonyms, antonyms and verbs. By doing this, the government has gained the power of meaning. Syme, a specialist in Newspeak tells the main character Winston exactly what control Newspeak has allowed the Party to have. “Don’t you see the whole aim of Newspeak is the narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall all make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.” (Orwell 54). Along with that, the Party also has complete control of written language by altering history related documents to match the history that is in favor of this political power. The altering of these documents is what happens to be Winston’s job. While at work Winston pondered the power of being able to control the past, coming to a startling realization. As written by the narrator of the novel, “the past, he reflected had not only been altered, it had actually been destroyed. For how could you establish even the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside your own memory?” (Orwell 36). On top of being historically mislead, citizens are restricted of express any thought of their own or any way to voice against the Party. When you no truthful record for the past, the past doesn’t exist. When you have no words to associate with a meaning, the meaning behind the word then vanishes just like the political history of Oceania. For these reasons, a society with government restricted verbal and written language is one that proves to be dystopian.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The metaphysical machine of Nineteen Eighty Four chooses to control its population through the use of psychological and behavioural modification manoeuvres. This manifests itself in the language of Newspeak, which the party has chosen to replace English. The party is constantly refining the language with the ultimate goal that no one will be capable of original…

    • 1115 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading 1984, there was identifiable dull and simplistic language, in able to control the overall thinking of the society. In my handbook, I tried to incorporate this idea by using shortened language that I invented, newspeak words taken directly from the book, and the overall dullness…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Newspeak

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Language is something unique and extremely important to human beings since our early development. It is unique to mankind and without it; societies nowadays surely can not function at all. Just imagine the society with no words being spoken, or written, no communication; it will just die out immediately. Each of us can understand the significance and the powerful impacts of languages. Therefore a question is raised: "Will the society dominated if language is controlled since language influences are so great?" illustrated clearly through the case of Newspeak- "a fictional language in George Orwell's famous novel Nineteen Eighty-Four…" "which has a greatly reduced and simplified vocabulary and grammar" which aims "to make subversive thought ("thoughtcrime")…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics