Preview

Definitions Assignment - Torts

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Definitions Assignment - Torts
Definitions Assignment - TORT

Intentional Torts – Intentional Torts are battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattel, and conversion. See examples of each below.

Battery – The intentional unlawful, harmful, or offensive touching of the person of another.
Example: The verbal argument has escalated to the point that Susan raised her hand and slapped Joe on the cheek. Susan committed battery against Joe.

Assault – The intentional threatening of another with a battery and the creating of apprehension of immediate bodily harm in the victim.
Example: The professional football player assaulted the referee by screaming that he was going to break the back of the referee and raised his helmet in the air with the gesture that he was going to strike. Fortunately, others rushed in to restrain him.

Transferred Intent Doctrine – The Transferred Intent Doctrine is when a defendant, while in the process of committing a battery against one person, unintentionally causes the touching of a third person. In such a case, the defendant’s wrongful intent is transferred to include the unintended victim. The third person can therefore proceed against the defendant on a battery theory.
Example: The new member of the gang struck the bat at the policeman but instead hit the bystander that was behind the policeman when the policeman bent over and dodged the bat. The transferred intent doctrine is therefore applicable such that the gangster is liable of battery towards the bystander.

Substantial Certainty Doctrine – The Substantial Certainty Doctrine holds that where the defendant does an act with the realization that it is substantially certain to result in a touching, the defendant is deemed to have intended the result and is therefore liable for the battery.
Example: The shopkeeper shot his rifle at the trespasser in close range but the rifle was defective and the bullet exploded inside the rifle itself. The substantial certainty doctrine

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    George Garton will likely be liable for battery because he intentionally blew smoke in Martin Trout’s face. In general, battery is defined as touching with the intent to harmfully or offensively contact another person. In this case, Mr. Garton’s actions were purposeful and showed intent. Also, Mr. Garton’s actions were offensive because smoke is an unpleasant substance. Therefore, the issue here is whether blowing smoke in Mr. Trout’s face is considered touching. Mr. Garton’s actions will likely be considered touching.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nominate Delicts

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages

    1. Assault – a deliberate act that intended to harm the victim physically or raise the state of fear of immediate physical harm without the consent of the victim.…

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Physical abuse involving contact intended to cause feelings of intimidation, injury, or other physical suffering or bodily harm.…

    • 2189 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rules In this case it is considered defense of persons in which is a legal justification for assault, battery and false imprisonment. Assault is someone that intentionally puts another in fear and battery is when someone using force against another person. False imprisonment is someone that is holding another person down against their will. The reason it is considered defense of persons because Leroy was using reasonable force by protecting Jane the third person from injury where John threatened by an attacking force.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Battery occurs when the defendant’s acts intentionally cause harmful or offensive contact with the victim’s person. [See Restatement §§ 13, 16, 18.] Accidental contact, by contrast, must be analyzed under negligence or strict liability.…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    ____ 3. To commit an intentional tort, one person must intend to harm a certain other person.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1 Torts Outline 1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An intentional tort is a person deliberately causing harm or loss to another person. Examples are trespassing, causing a nuisance and defaming are intentional torts.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case 1 In the case at Gigantic State University, students that were a part of the SFT committed several careless acts. Within this particular case there was a definite crime that was committed because both Prudence’s physical and mental integrity was harmed. Not only could this case be classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek, pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible, or “liable,” for those injuries. According to the case, Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between Assault & Battery Crimes Simple Assault & Battery - In Florida, an assault is intentional threats, words, or actions that cause a person to fear impending violence.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TORTS PRETEST

    • 960 Words
    • 6 Pages

    assumption of risk contributory negligence comparative negligence ALL OF THE ABOVE Question 3 ASSAULT, BATTERY AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT ARE EXAMPLES OF ____ TORTS THAT INVOLVE INTERFERENCE WITH A PERSON'S BODY.…

    • 960 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Violence in Hockey

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages

    One of the more popular examples of this is the very recent Todd Bertuzzi case. In this case the defendant who is Todd Bertuzzi being charged with assault causing bodily harm. On the night of March 8th, 2004 in Vancouver, Bertuzzi wished to seek revenge on the plaintiff Steven Moore, after a so called "cheap shot", which Steve Moore hit Bertuzzi's teammate Markus Naslund with an elbow in a previous game. Late in the hockey game Bertuzzi proceeded to skate up behind Moore and grabbed his shoulder and ‘sucker punched' Moore in the side of the head, Moore then fell to the ice while a pile-up of players fell on top of him. Moore suffered fractured vertebrae, nerve damage, and a concussion. Right away this was being looked at by Vancouver Police Officials and the decision was whether or not this should be viewed from a legal standpoint. Arguments went back and forth with opinions after opinions.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By definition aggravated assault can be described as the crime of physically attacking another person which results in serious bodily harm and/or is made with a deadly or dangerous…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    by the state that the assault by the police officer was a negligent trespass and therefore exemplary and aggravated damages could not be awarded, was rejected. The Court found that it was clear that it was a case of intentional tort, but refrained from determining that if it had been a negligent trespass. In a view of that fact, a great caution must also be used in seeking to damages award.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Residents v. Chetum Issue: Battery Rule: Under the common law, Battery is an intentional harmful or offensive touching of another without consent or privilege.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics