Preview

Definition of Land Ethics

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Definition of Land Ethics
Section 304
Land ethic essay
11/28/12
Definition of Land ethics

In upshot, which is a part of “The Sand County Almanac”, Leopold describes land ethics and suggests that we should adopt this ethics into our daily lives. Also, he meditates on the issue on environment and ethical implications of the environmentalism. According to Leopold, land ethic is “willing limitation on freedom of action in the struggle of survival.” Also, he states “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise” to define land ethics. He points out that land is made of interdependent parts and it is a community not a commodity. In addition, he points out that humans are not the owner or the master of the land community. Instead, humans are only part of the land which is a community. In other words, he emphasizes the community. He believes that mutual exchange between individuals is a key to protect the community and land ethic simply is community expanded to nature/land. Furthermore, he points out that everything in this world is required to understand the land. In other words, it means that we comprehend our place and other creatures’ place only in the context of the whole. For example, wolf is an enemy of the deer since it hunts deer, but wolf also can be a helper. Deer developed it keen hearing and running ability because of predator like wolf. In other hands, wolf developed its smelling ability and sharp teeth to catch animal like dears. Lastly, Leopards states that we should always value this land community and it is all of our duty to preserve beauty, power, stability, and integrity of this land

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold, in his essay collection A Sand County Almanac explores the natural world, and the symbiotic relationship that’s shared between plant and animal, while also insinuating how humans live in opposition to that fragile synchrony, for we live to reshape our environment for contemporary gains. Leopold is able to write the essay as an ecological historian, who’s knowledge comes from the topography of the Wisconsin landscape, the rings of an Oak tree, or a single atom entombed in a limestone ledge. The first two sections of the book gravitate around two opposing forces conservation and modern progress (scientific advancement, economical growth.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The land ethic In Leopold’s view, humans see themselves as conquerors of the environment, and this is the key fault we all begin with in achieving this symbiosis with nature. This can be referred to as the conqueror role- we think we know what makes a community “tick.” We think we can manage it, and be “kings” of the land. But we don’t know as much as we think we do. He persists there is an instrumental value to nature, and this is one of the reasons we have no choice but to preserve it, we cannot survive as a species without its resources.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For their time, Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold held to beliefs that would influence conservationist ideals for many years to come. These pioneers of the concept of "harmony between men and land" (Leopold, 1949, p. 217) constructed a new wave of thinking towards conservation. Their work provided the foundations of contemporary thinking, which is more concerned with globalization and education than moral obligation. Although conservation is still a well discussed issue, many steps have yet to be taken to align society with the goals necessary to preserve a lush natural world. Pinchot held that the natural world exists for the sole "benefit of the people who live [on the Earth]" (Pinchot, 1910, p.33).…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “The Land Ethic” by Aldo Leopold I found that his research and understanding of land ethics is very thorough and he makes valid points that should be read by everyone in our society. He gives a different outlook on land that makes sense and creates a vivid image of the way that we as human should view land. He describes land as not just soil that lies beneath our feet or below the plants that we walk on, cut, or eat, but as the first layer in a community of which each piece is dependent on one another. If one piece of the community were to fall or not do what it is intended, it would in turn make it difficult for the rest of the community the thrive as it should. When thinking of land it makes it easier if it is thought of as…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sand County Almanac

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A ‘land ethic’ is a philosophy that guides and regulates the actions humans take when they attempt to change or use the land. I feel that people over use and over-work the land and resources that we have in the world. Sure, I like to have fancy things but when I think about the fact that everyone in the world likes to have these things they don’t need at all it makes me sick. We are killing our planet every day. I don’t like saying ‘we’ need to come up with a cheaper and cleaner form of energy because I feel hypocritical, but that is definitely something that has got to happen. It is imperative that we meet the needs of society today in such a way that we are still able to meet the needs of future generations.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    SHAFT has written a very ethical, appealing, analytical and supportive article on particular situations in the Pacific Northwest’s forests and Indiana farmlands. From this article, we are supposed to believe that SHAFT is fighting for a noble cause, which is the protection of the environment and the innocent creatures. In addition, it has acquired much information about the logging industry and SHAFT depicts their cause to be important.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold was a conservationist, forester philosopher, educator, writer and outdoor enthusiast and was among the founding fathers of the North American conservation movement during the first half of twentieth century (Leopold, 1981). He argues that humans are part of a community that includes the land, from the soil to the rivers and seas (Leopold, 1981). According to Leopold (1981), until humans recognize that they are part of the land and act accordingly, they will continue to negatively impact the environment and their own health by extension (Leopold, 1981)…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Sand County Almanac

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most of Leopold’s arguments were in my opinion good arguments. In the third part, Leopold brings to my attention the obvious ironies of conservation. To promote the appreciation of wildlife and gain political support, one encourages recreational usage of wilderness. That same recreational use destroys the very environment that you would be trying to conserve. Leopold talks about how people want to take a trophy from the wilderness to share or always remember their experience. He says that just being there is a trophy enough. I love to hunt and I love to widdle wood. In Leopold’s eyes I would be taking trophies. He goes into such detail describing small creatures; that I usually would shoot for fun, but he really opened my eyes to how just the slightest change can affect so much in an ecosystem that I think twice.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold presents many interesting aspects regarding ecology and conservation within his writing of the Land Ethic, Round River, and “Think like a Mountain”. One statement that stood out among the rest was “Harmony with land is like harmony with a friend; you cannot cherish the right hand and chop off his left". The land is much like the human body—if one part is damaged or sick, the effects can be witnessed elsewhere. Like a cancer that attacks the cells, the effect of pollution, overhunting, and over farming can spread far beyond the site of initial damage. Further, Leopold points out the flaws of solving the conservation dilemma. So little is known about the environment and how it functions, and how each part makes such an impact on other seemingly unrelated parts. We cannot go about tinkering and toying with different aspects and take out species of plants and animals assuming that they will not impact the overall health of the surroundings. No matter how small, each element impacts that around in one way or another. It may provide nourishment, its decay may enrich the soil, or it may provide a vital service to another species. Again like a human body, removing a species is like removing an organ or a gland. We may be able to live without it, but something will be changed, a scar will remain, and the overall being will be weakened. Leopold points out that we have yet to think in terms of the seemingly unimportant pieces and only focus on those species and habitats in which we see value and beauty. We spend time preserving the species that are economically valuable to the population and don’t worry about the ones that are costing us economically. Like the wolves in “Think like a Mountain,” species causing economic damage (through things like slow growth, crop damage, or killing of livestock) are viewed as more expendable, less important pieces in the puzzle. We must have some responsibility for those species as well because they provide vital services to…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Environmental Ethics, Hunting, and the Place of Animals,” Gary Varner examines how two varieties of sentientism, animal rights and animal welfare, “could address the specific ways in which they are alleged to be at odds with sound environmental policy” (Varner 858).Environmental ethics surfaced as a response to claims that anthropocentric thinking in ethics is the “root cause of environmental problems” (Varner 855). Sentiest views such as animal welfare and animal rights were favorable to some environmental ethicists to “counter anthropocentrism” (Varner 855), but many believed “that an adequate environmental ethic had to be holistic; [meaning] it had to attribute intrinsic, noninstrumental value to entities such as species and ecosystems … [unlike] both animal welfare and rights views, [where] only the lives of conscious individuals have intrinsic value” (Varner 855). Furthermore, environmental ethicists “claim that…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to do this, mankind must acknowledge the interdependence of each part of the community. In a society that values imperialism and views the Land as a commodity belonging to it, the idea of loving and caring for the Land as a necessity to the health of the entire biota seems unnatural. However this is far from the truth; without a unity between man and the Land, the community does not function as it should. In one of Leopold’s essays, entitled “River of the Mother of God”, he states that “The Land consists of soil, water, plants, and animals, but health is more than a sufficiency of these components. It is a state of vigorous self-renewal in each of them, and in all collectively. Such collective functioning of interdependent parts for the maintenance of the whole is characteristic of an organism” (310). It is therefore humankind’s responsibility to love, cherish, protect, and conserve the Land just as another member of the community. If not, the whole “organism” will not function or have capacity for self-renewal. Leopold goes on to say that “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise” (224,225). Not only is it right, but essential to preserve the Land, or the entire biotic community will be at stake. This is the main theme behind Leopold’s writings, and the Land Ethic will require man to…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author argues inherent value. Regan points out animals should be able to experience life with inherent value of their own. Addressing commercial animal agriculture, the author declares "The fundamental moral wrong here is not that animals are kept in stressful close confinement or in isolation, or that their pain and suffering, their needs and preferences are ignored or discounted." Regan continues the only way to right the wrong would be to stop…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When looking at things from an ethical perspective, one has to consider how to protect and preserve the basic needs of others as well as their own. There is no difference here when dealing with the well being of animals. Alice Walter and Ted Kerasote are two individuals who deal with ethical issues regarding the well being of animals, and while their stories are vastly different, their main points have overlapping similarities. In Anthony Weston’s A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox, both Walter and Kerasote’s experiences are explicitly detailed through Walter’s essay, “Am I Blue?,” and Kerasote’s excerpt from Bloodties: Nature, Culture, and the Hunt. Throughout both of their experiences, Weston’s three-part concept of ethics is put into full-effect.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epic of Gilgamesh

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think in modern day society we still find ourselves trying to tame nature. With the clearing of rainforests for development and to the taming of animals. I think in today’s society we waste the land and the benefits we get from…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In humans recent history there has been an increased noticeable mistreatment of the world around them. Humans need to know we are not the only ones living there, there are plants and animals and future offspring for all. Not only does the earth need to be treated well for them but it also needs to be treated well for us, because we rely on them for a healthy life. Many people may say that there is a connection between nature and humans theses thoughts are expressed in Annie Dillard's short story, “Living Like Weasels”. Both authors have their point of view on topics but both agree that human behavior needs to improve for a bigger better future.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays