Preview

Defence Attorney Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Defence Attorney Example
Derek Morris
Mrs. Badiuk
American Government
4 February 2013
Mrs. Badiuk’s Dilemma As your defense attorney I plan to prove your innocence. After reading the statement from that night I noticed many rights were violated. First I noticed that the police violated the 5th amendment when they beat you until you admitted to the crime. The 5th amendment protects all people from self-incrimination, and that is what happened to you. Also by setting the bail to $25,000 the 8th amendment was violated. The bail amount was too excessive and you couldn’t pay it. The 6th amendment states that the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial. In your case this didn’t happen considering you remained in jail until your trial date which was over two years later. Also stated by the 6th amendment the defendant has the right to be represented by an attorney and you were not. The 4th amendment should have protected your house from being searched without a warrant, but it was searched anyways. On your trial date there were also multiple violations to the constitution. By having the jury consist of six department store executives and six students you failed the 6th amendment was not considered. The 6th amendment calls for an impartial jury of the state. The 4th amendment was violated when the merchandise found in your house was used in court. The 4th amendment states that evidence gained as the result of an unlawful search or seizure cannot be used at the court trial of the person from who is was seized. When Mr. Greenberg got you to be retried and later found guilty the 5th amendment should have prevented you from being tried on the same offence twice. The 8th amendment didn’t protect you from excessive fines or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Arthur Kirkland, an idealistic defense attorney in Baltimore, cares about his clients and visits his aging grandfather, who put him through law school every week. Things aren't going well for Arthur: two of his clients are increasingly desperate.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendant: Case Study

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Defendant when his daughter was living with him constantly updated the Plaintiff of what was going on with their daughter.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case, the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial, he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly, this letter stated that Miranda had full knowledge of his legal rights. From the evidence found, Miranda was sentenced to prison for 20 to 30 years. From here the Supreme Court stated that, “...Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession…” (Miranda V Arizona).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief Fact Summary: Self-incriminating evidence was provided by the defendants while interrogated by police without prior notification of the Fifth Amendment Rights of the United States Constitution.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. Hayes appealed his case in many courts, which resulted in all of his appeals being denied. Hayes felt as if the prosecutor tried to coerce him to plead guilty, but yet, threaten him at the same time. The possibility of Mr. Hayes’s constitutional rights being violated was another issue included in his appeal.…

    • 344 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona 1966

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Soon thereafter his conviction Miranda appealed his case to the Arizona Supreme court. The Arizona Supreme Court upheld the conviction and Disagreed with the unconstitutional confession. It was then that Miranda took his appeal to the United States Supreme Court. In a fourth fifths vote the United States Supreme court ruled in favor of Miranda agreeing that the police that interrogated Miranda denied him of not only his 6th amendment right to counsel however also his fifth amendment right to incriminate himself. On a completely different note the Supreme Court recognized that Miranda as well as others accused of committing crimes have long been subject to police violence and intimidation especially during interrogations and therefore many confessions have been not only forced but possibly…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Miranda vs Arizona case Miranda established that the police are required to inform arrested persons that they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them, and that they have the right to an attorney. The case involved a claim by the plaintiff that the state of Arizona, by obtaining a confession from him without having informed him of his right to have a lawyer present, had violated his rights under the Fifth Amendment regarding self incrimination. Miranda was arrested for kidnap and rape and was interrogated for a long period of time. This interrogation resulted in a signed confession. At court Miranda lawyer argued that the confession was obtained from a person who does not understand their rights. The court agreed that a person should be informed of their rights and understand them before the police…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    My Supreme Court case is Miranda V. Arizona. This case represents the consolidation of four cases, in each of the cases which the defendant all confessed guilt after being questing without being told their Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights during an interrogation. This case was happening on March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping and rape case. After two hours of interrogation, the police obtained a written confession from Miranda which confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers had not asked Miranda of his right to have an attorney…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank-you your honor, At this time I would like to call Samantha Whalen to the stand.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you have suffered a personal injury, obtaining legal representation is essential to obtaining the compensation you are due by law. When the negligence or carelessness of another has led to your pain, you deserve to have someone advocate for you to determine the damages and liabilities associated with your injury. You may qualify based on physical, mental or emotional injuries.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason the defense argued the initial search and subsequent seizure violated the Fourth Amendment of the men being accused is because the arresting officer did not have probable cause for arrest, and simultaneously did not posses a warrant to search the suspects. The court denied the motion to suppress the evidence, and inevitably found the men guilty. The defense appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, but the court held the original…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The police duty to give these warnings is compelled by the Constitution's Fifth Amendment, which gives a criminal suspect the right to refuse "to be a witness against himself," and Sixth Amendment, which guarantees criminal defendants the right to an attorney.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona was the case that altered the criminal justice system. It gives criminals the rights they do not deserve. Ernesto Miranda was the man who was responsible for the change in law enforcement. He argued that he was not informed of his rights during his arrest and his Fifth and Sixth amendments were violated. After that, the Miranda Rights were established to protect the suspect from refusing to answer self-incriminating questions and the right to an attorney. The Fifth Amendment’ s rights protection against self- incrimination and double jeopardy, and right to a grand jury indictment . The Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy and public trial, trial by jury, confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses, and counsel.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appellate Brief Example

    • 5428 Words
    • 22 Pages

    LEJ 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF F A^ SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 1051361 BARBARA MORRI S N , Plaintiff /Appellant versus PATRICIA T. SPIVEY ET AL, Defendants/Appellees 1 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry County , Alabama 1 BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT , BARB RA ISON Submitted by.…

    • 5428 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment Clauses

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This amendment is known to most Americans than whatever is left of the amendments due to the renowned expression: I argue the fifth. This expression is habitually utilized as a protection within criminal trials. The amendment comprises of five separate clauses. These clauses are double jeopardy clause, grand jury clause, the self-incrimination clause, due process clause and the taking 's clause. The Fifth Amendment’s guarantees Americans a few essential rights. For example, the right not to be rebuffed or attempted more than once for the same wrongdoing, right to proper sensible payment for any private property taken by the legislature for open utilization, and the right to trial for specific law violations by grand…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays