Preview

Decline Of The Roman Republic Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
938 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Decline Of The Roman Republic Essay
The Roman Republic was birthed after the legendary rape of Lucretia, as told by Roman historian Livy. The subsequent overthrow by Lucius Junius Brutus of King Tarquin the Proud’s monarchy led to the creation of the Roman Republic in 509 B.C.E. The focal-point of the new order was to emphasize the sharing of power, which contributed to its fast-paced success. However, the Republic also decayed and collapsed as quickly as it had grown. The main factors that attributed to its decline were the political reforms proposed by the Gracchi, its rapid expansion and conquests, and the consuls Marius and Sulla. These three factors all played significant roles in the decay of the Roman Republic and its transition into the Roman Empire. Tiberius and Gaius …show more content…
By opening the military enrollment to the proletarians, they were able to gain wealth through riches they plundered through their conquests. However, this support and loyalty also hindered the Republic. By having a military that was more loyal to its leader rather than the people it served, Gaius and his military quickly transformed into a patron-client system. Gaius had full support from the military in whatever his decisions were, good or bad. By setting a precedent for future Roman commanders, he helped accelerate the rate of the Republic’s …show more content…
After defeating Marius and his supporters, Sulla obtained full control of the city. He then began to exterminate anyone who opposed his beliefs. He quickly did this through a procedure called proscription, which were hit-lists of those who the terrified Senate proved guilty of treason and allowed the killer to receive their victims wealth. The Senate also then gave the title of dictator to Sulla, which gave him total control of political offices and promoted the optimates
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gaius Marius And Cornelius Sull Turmoil In Roman Society
    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gaius Marius And Cornelius Sull Turmoil In Roman Society

    Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla are portrayed as being culpable for a generation of turmoil in Roman society, through the period of the second and first century. After the fall of the Gracchi, the aristocracy was refurbished, and the plague of corruption yet again swallowed the senate. The attempts of two patriotic men had been violently relieved and the incompetence of the senatorial oligarchy to put the welfare of its people first, again created an unbalance of the elite. Furthermore with a clear opportunity to weaken the hold of the aristocracy, it must be considered how Gaius Marius came to front as a Popularis and ultimately true successor of the Gracchi; and how he was overthrown by Lucius Sulla in 86BC as the leader of the aristocratic…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Significance of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars to the Political Developments of Republican Rome
    • 2247 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Significance of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars to the Political Developments of Republican Rome

    The wars against Mithridates and the Parthians in the period 78-31BC are acutely significant on the political developments of the Roman Republic. The expansion of the Roman Empire into Eastern settlements took place under the leadership of an oligarchy, thus, politicians had to distinguish themselves through military achievements to be elected to gain influence in the Republic. Throughout the Mithridatic War, Pompey used his military victory over Mithridates in 63BC in order to gain political recognition in Rome. However, due to the constant fear of the emergence of autocratic behaviour, the senate refused to ratify Pompey’s Eastern Settlement. The intransigence of the oligarchy ultimately stimulated the formation of the first triumvirate, a strategic alliance which intimidated senatorial powers. Correspondingly, this increased intimidation between the three triumvirs, leading to Crassus’s unsuccessful Parthian campaign in which his death marked the breakdown of the triumvirate. Political instability within Rome spurred the outbreak of the civil war providing Caesar with immense autocratic power, undermining that of the senate. Due to Caesar’s assassination in 44BC, the collapse of the Republican political system in Rome was provoked through Antony’s unsuccessful assumption of Caesar’s Parthian campaign and the failure of the second triumvirate. The results of the Mithridatic and Parthian Wars were significant in their stimulation of the downfall of the Roman Republic and provided an insight into Imperial Rome.…

    • 2247 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Principate Of Tiberius Research Paper
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Principate Of Tiberius Research Paper

    The Principate of Tiberius provided stability and prosperity to Rome and its provinces, consolidating the policies and practices established by Augustus. Tiberius worked cooperatively with the Senate and introduced reforms which benefited rule in the provinces and strengthened administration of the empire. While he provided careful oversight of the administration of the Roman Empire and the army, increasingly he sought to delegate his role. He distanced himself from the people with the introduction of the maiestas trials and from the central control of his government by retiring to Capri and relying on Sejanus for information.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gracchi Glory
    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Gracchi Glory

    “[Gaius] had deprived Senators of judicial powers, interfered in foreign affairs, championed popular sovereignty and made a takeover bid for the patronage of all Italy. His own power was not merely more blatant than that of Tiberius but had lasted twice as long, raising the very real threat of regnum based on popular support. This fear was strengthened when Gaius stood for election a third time, which suggests he was indeed trying to revolutionise, not merely reform, Rome 's…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change
    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Sparta Change

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Augustus: Establishment of the Principate
    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Augustus: Establishment of the Principate

    When he found out, he didn’t go to Rome straight away (danger) wen to Italy…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic

    The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year. The senate was one of two legislative bodies comprised of 300 senators and 10 tribunes who were all patricians. The other body was knows as the tribal assembly and was made up of plebeians who met in a forum to vote on things such as consuls. When Julius Caesar was assassinated a civil war broke out in Rome. The senate was no longer trusted to rule Rome bringing the republic to an end and the empire to a beginning in 27 BCE. An empire is a form of government in which one person -the emperor- had all the real power. Emperors took power through force or inheritance and ruled for life, though many were assassinated. Some emperors embodied peaceful, prosperous, philosophical and basically just "great" praises. Where as others were vicious, mentally disturbed doctoral murders. The reason for the difference between the roman republic and empire is that in the republic the goal was to avoid having one person with too much power where as in the empire it was basically that due to the corruption with in the senate.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Republic Research Paper
    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Roman Republic Research Paper

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Republic Research Paper
    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Roman Republic Research Paper

    tried to build a more solid senate but failed to take power away from the…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ancient greek
    • 626 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ancient greek

    The Roman republic was a part of the of ancient Rome struggle for stability. This struggle started with the collapse of the Roman Monarchy government structure in 509 BC. The republic lasted approximately 482 years pending its collapse through sequences of interior battles. The major cause for this down fall was the power struggle between the two classes.…

    • 626 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pax Roman The Decline Of The Roman Empire
    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pax Roman The Decline Of The Roman Empire

    Pax Romana (161 - 180AD) -which is also known as the golden period of the empire was marked by peace, economic prosperity, an efficient government and a significant contribution to the sciences and arts the empire had taken a toll towards its decline. Although there is not one main reason that lead to the decline of the Roman empire but there were multiple internal and external affairs, inflation which is a drastic drop in the value of money coupled with a rise in prices.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Essay
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fall Of Rome Essay

    Rome was believed to be one of the greatest empires in the ancient world. It seemed as though the Roman Empire was unstoppable. But due to political, economic and religious changes that occurred around the time of the Emperor Diocletian, the Roman Empire was destined to fall.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of The Roman Republic Essay
    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fall Of The Roman Republic Essay

    It's the year 509 B.C. and the Romans are finally no longer under the rule of the Etruscan king. They create a republic where they elect citizens to rule. The aristocrats or patricians dominated while the plebeians had almost no say in the government. Plebeian and Patrician were kept apart and where prohibited to marry each other. Plebeians then began electing tribunes who could veto acts passed by the senate Plebeians slowly gained more power until they were able to hold the position of consul, while Patricians still bought power using their wealth. Sometimes in emergency situations the consuls and senate would elect a temporary dictator until the crisis was over. A great example is a farmer who left his farm in a time of war, became dictator and stepped down after defeating Rome's enemies The first Roman laws written down were carved into twelve stone tablets although they would be considered harsh by today's standards. They are as follows females shall remain in guardianship even when they have…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Republic: How Democratic Was The Roman Republic
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Republic: How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

    Democracy is a system controlled by people in which they rule their own government. Democracy most of the time is seen as fair by the people. There are also requirements to being truly identified as democratic. The Roman Republic was only democratic to a certain extent. It’s government consisted only of men. This isn’t fair to the women and slaves when making decisions for the government. It isn’t fair to women because they were also citizens.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics