Debate
This proposal is simply an invasion of privacy.
Monitoring is lazy parenting.
Other parental controls are more practical and reasonable to administer.
Monitoring is a hindrance to forming relationships both outside and inside the family.
. It is one thing for a parent to be able to see the posted information, but enabling them to log into the account gives allows them full access to deleting or changing things. This is taking precautions too far
Giving parents the passwords to their children's accounts is taking parental involvement too far.
Many parents request that their children add them as friends on Facebook or other social media sites. This allows them to be able to view who their children are interacting with as well as the content they are posting while still giving their child a sense of privacy and independence. Being able to have access to social networking sites is a privilege parents give their children. The child is meant to handle it with responsibility and gain a sense of independence. The current level of parent involvement in social media is enough.
12-16% of a person's friends. This percentage is made up of mostly close friends of the individual.
Giving their parents the passwords to their social networking accounts takes away a teenager's sense of freedom. It also would make them feel as though their parents did not trust them. If a parent allows their child to use social media, chances are the child is old enough to handle themself responsibly without extreme levels of parental control and interference. They are not babies. While parents should be aware of their children's online activities, there is a line that should not be crossed. Increased levels of parental involvement in their child's social networking, such as knowing the passwords, is taking things too far.
Ground rules
Talk to them before
Having a healthy relationship
Need going behind hide things
Communication
Angry tell you things-should come naturally
U shouldn’t let them if
Monitoring is lazy parenting.
Other parental controls are more practical and reasonable to administer.
Monitoring is a hindrance to forming relationships both outside and inside the family.
. It is one thing for a parent to be able to see the posted information, but enabling them to log into the account gives allows them full access to deleting or changing things. This is taking precautions too far
Giving parents the passwords to their children's accounts is taking parental involvement too far.
Many parents request that their children add them as friends on Facebook or other social media sites. This allows them to be able to view who their children are interacting with as well as the content they are posting while still giving their child a sense of privacy and independence. Being able to have access to social networking sites is a privilege parents give their children. The child is meant to handle it with responsibility and gain a sense of independence. The current level of parent involvement in social media is enough.
12-16% of a person's friends. This percentage is made up of mostly close friends of the individual.
Giving their parents the passwords to their social networking accounts takes away a teenager's sense of freedom. It also would make them feel as though their parents did not trust them. If a parent allows their child to use social media, chances are the child is old enough to handle themself responsibly without extreme levels of parental control and interference. They are not babies. While parents should be aware of their children's online activities, there is a line that should not be crossed. Increased levels of parental involvement in their child's social networking, such as knowing the passwords, is taking things too far.
Ground rules
Talk to them before
Having a healthy relationship
Need going behind hide things
Communication
Angry tell you things-should come naturally
U shouldn’t let them if