Preview

Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1100 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Debate
Introduction

DEBATING: A BASIC INTRODUCTION
BEGINNER
Let’s start at the beginning. Every debate needs a topic. This is a contentious assertion that forms the basis for the debate. For example, the topic might be “THAT IT IS BETTER TO BE SMART THAN TO BE KIND” or “THAT THE UNITED NATIONS HAS FAILED”. This book relates to a specific but common style of debate. It is the style used in most schools throughout Australia and in many other countries, at the Australian National Schools Debating Championships and at the World Schools Debating Championships. In this style, there are two teams in every debate. One team is required to argue that the topic is true. This team is called the ‘affirmative’, or sometimes the ‘proposition’. The other team is required to argue that the topic is not true. This team is called the ‘negative’, or sometimes the ‘opposition’. Each team uses two basic types of argument to support for its side of the topic. First, there are substantive arguments. These are prepared arguments in favour of a team’s side of the topic. Second, there is rebuttal. Rebuttal is your attack on your opposition’s arguments. The difference between substantive arguments and rebuttal is the distinction between showing why your team is right and showing why your opposition is wrong. It is impossible to say whether substantive arguments or rebuttal are more important – each is just as important as the other, and each is vital for successful debating. There are three speakers on each team. Speakers are usually identified by their speaking number and their team side. For example, debaters might speak of the ‘First Affirmative’ (the first speaker of the affirmative team), or the ‘Third Negative’ (the
3 www.learndebating.com

Introduction

third speaker of the negative team). Every speaker except the First Affirmative (the first speaker in the entire debate) is expected to rebut his or her opposition. The first and second speakers on both teams are also expected to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ascascas

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Read one (1) of the following articles from Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing: A Brief Guide to Argument:…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Each team will have three, two-minute chances to speak. In the first two-minute period they will present their argument. The second two-minute period will be used for rebuttal. In the rebuttal period, a team may argue only points which the other side has presented. The third two-minute period will be a summation (summarize main talking points/close argument).…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The Great Debate

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scenario 3 debates the use of images when the artist is not credited for them. In this scenario, a co-worker with whom you are working on a book club advertisement with is trying to use images, cropping out the artist’s name that was on them, and also not wanting to credit the artist anywhere else on the completed project. This is against fair use guidelines, even though the project (a brochure) is not going to be sold, and is merely being used to promote a library activity (a book club). Ivy Tech Community College’s Ivy Tilt tutorial on copyright (n.d.) provide a succinct look at the basic issue here, by stating that “[m]ost information is protected by copyright. The exception…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Gatto Papaer

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Wood, Nancy, and Miller James. Perspectives On Argument. 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2012. Print…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discussion

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Aldrich, M. (1995). Preventing ‘the Needless Peril of the Coal Mine’: The Bureau of Mines and the Campaign Against Coal Mine Explosions, 1910–1940. Technology and Culture, Society for the History of Technology, pp. 483–518.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rba Personal Essay Sample

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My involvement in adjudicating for debating at UWS under the guidance of USYD’s debating club best reflects my desire to assist others, in this case, younger students (years 7 & 8) who were practising with debating. I undertook this work because it was rewarding to assist others become more confident in communicating their ideas but was also both a challenging and valuable…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the great debate

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page

    David Souter was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, on September 17, 1939 into a wealthy family. After graduating from Harvard Law School in 1966, Souter joined private practice Concord law firm of Orr and Reno. Souter based his decision at Orr and Reno. Souter practiced a wide variety of law ranging from corporate law to general litigation. After two years of disliking private practice, Souter eagerly accepted a position as attorney general of New Hampshire in 1968.By 1973, Souter was appointed associate justice of the supreme court of New Hampshire. President Bush appointed Souter to the U.S. Court of Appeals in 1990, most his decisions were in agreement with Sandra Day O’Connor. Souter was a republican and held close ties with George H.W. Bush. Souter was a strong supporter of the Republican Party and supported abortion and declared hate crime sentencing without a jury unconstitutional in June of 2000.David Souter was an old fashioned conservative man and a frugal New-Englander. His religious affiliated as an Episcopalian, and was a member of the Episcopalian church and part of the Anglican Communion.…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tannen

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both readings provide a great understanding of how we live in an argument culture where “us versus them” type of attitude have been so deeply engrained in how we communicate and interact with others through media and politics. The idea that opposition is seen to be the most effective way to get…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discussion

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Describe 3 abnormal assessment findings for a child, adolescent, pregnant woman, adult or older adult which indicate a nutritional problem. What additional questions should the nurse ask based on these findings? What are the Healthy People Goals for this population? How can the nurse promote health and adequate nutrition based on this problem? Does the nutritional problem have any legal or ethical implications?…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world today, the word “argument” is used on a daily basis and usually carries a bad meaning. In fact, the word is used so much that people often mistaken it’s true meaning. According to the book Writing Arguments by John Ramage, John Bean and June Johnson, there is no universally accepted definition of “argument.” The meaning of the term is rather complex, and it has been remained a controversial issue of philosophers and rhetoricians over the centuries (2). Because of the complexity of the word, we need to examine three important points in order to understand what “argument” truly meant: the misconceptions about the meaning of argument, the features of argument, and the relationship of argument to the problem of truth.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Debate

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution of The United States is a living document. I believe it is because we can amend it.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A presidential debate is an honest and collaborative effort to explore issues however, it is a competition. Although each candidate is working towards the main goal, a better nation, they are not working together to achieve it. Furthermore, each candidate is seeking the truth, yet is trying to win the election. There are a handful of occurrences in the 2008 McCain and Obama debate where each candidate points out the past mistakes of the opposing man, instead of focusing on how to repair the fault. Obama points out a few of McCain’s mistakes and how he is promising different tasks without explaining the process. In addition, Obama mentions McCain’s name when talking about America’s budget increasing. He wants to associate the troubling cost…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In class or in seminars hat many students attend, debates take place to deeply discuss important and urgent topics. The debate is a series of questions and answers and challenges challenged to discuss am certain topic. The arguments thrown at each other help the two sides of the argument to help bring attention to the points they are making.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Since, for, seeing that, in view of the fact that, because, given that, being that, as, as indicated by.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negative Speakers Roles

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Negative Speaker’s Roles: (Affirmative 1st Speech) 1st Speech 1. Do you accept the Affirmative definition? If no, explain why :( in a PROPER PARAGRAPH) e.g. (NO COPYING): we the negative team accepts this definition/disagrees with this definition because… 2. Rebuttal: This CAN NOT is written before the debate. Rebuttal is when you say why they were wrong and they do the same. You have to look for as many points as you can to say they are wrong (but they cannot be random e.g. vocabulary mistakes), you can never have to much rebuttal(but you do have a time limit, 4­5 minutes per speech BUT you also have points to present too ). You have three chances to rebut in the whole debate, but you can’t keep them “un­updated”, e.g. you are saying your last point and you rebut about something the opposing team said in the beginning. You should start with something like this(NO COPYING): Before I start my points, I would like to point out some misleading points from the opposing team. They have said… 3. Allocation: Plan out your points(NO COPYING): e.g. As my first point, I will be speaking about…(MINIMUM: 4 POINTS) 4. Say your first 2 points, don’t forget to use P.E.E.L. (NO COPYING)::…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics