Preview

Death Penalty and Electric Chair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
995 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty and Electric Chair
When Moran writes that he aims "to demonstrate how our most cherished social values can be manipulated to serve pecuniary interests: the way in which public policy is affected by behind-the-scenes maneuvering of powerful and often ruthless business interests," I think he is talking solely about the death penalty (xviii). There are various aspects within the death penalty that make it a much more dynamic issue. Throughout his book, Moran writes about the inhumanity of the death penalty, including the barbaric methods and public spectacle of the act prior to William Kemmler, and most importantly, the safety and efficacy of direct current versus alternating current in the eventually preferred method of the electric chair. Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse, along with a few others, were the players who manipulated how the public, and therefore the lawmakers, felt about this social policy. As it is today, the death penalty was a big debate issue in the early part of the nineteenth century. I think it is interesting that, considering his major public role in this issue, Thomas Edison was initially against capital punishment. When Dr. Southwick solicited Mr. Edison 's advice on the electric chair, Edison wrote "as a progressive and a free thinker, he was a lifelong opponent of the death penalty" (74). With further prodding, and deeper review, Edison realized how getting involved with this issue would help his personal business cause. Thomas Edison 's light business was quickly losing ground to rival George Westinghouse. He knew he was widely respected as an electrical engineer and claimed not to change his stance on executions, but acknowledged the necessity and offered a humane alternative with electricity. More specifically and strategically, he offered up George Westinghouse 's alternating current dynamos as a possibility because he claimed, "the passage of the current from these machines…produces instantaneous death" (75). These statements made


Bibliography: Richard, Moran Executioner 's Current: Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse, and the Invention of the Electric Chair. (New York: Vintage Press, 2002), pp 74, 75, 84, 105, 160, 179.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the historical era in the state of Texas, the use of the death penalty was common and frequent; before 1923 districts carried out executions themselves, in the form of hanging. However in 1923 the state of Texas prepared every execution to be carried out by the state in Huntsville using the electric chair as the method of execution. The state of Texas put to death their first prisoner by electrocution on February 8, 1924 and there were four more executions following the very first one on that date. The inmates that were sentenced to death and the areas that the executions were taken place were located in the Huntsville division from 1928 to 1965, and the last electrocution was carried out on July 30, 1964. This state electrocuted a sum of 361 inmates from 1924 to 1964. During the changes and views on capital punishment in the year of 1964, there were legal disputes regarding the death penalty that resulted in the de facto moratorium on executions in the United States. During these challenging times on June 29, 1972 in the case of Furman v. Georgia the United States Supreme Court ruled that each states capital punishment law in the U.S. was illicit since the death penalty was unjustly used and arbitrarily assigned. During that time there were 52 men in Texas awaiting execution, however the governor overturned all their sentences to life in prison and there wasn’t anyone left on death row by March of 1973. Even though death row was cleared and the inmates received life sentences, the state of Texas approved a new statue in1973 to regulate how capital punishment was assessed. In 1974 with the new statue, jurors began enforcing death sentences and the number of death row inmates began to increase once again. In 1977 Texas implemented lethal injection as a form of execution and the first lethal injection was administered on December 7, 1982.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sue, A. P. (1998, Jan 25). Pro-death penalty but chivalrous texans debate fate of karla faye tucker. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/408352096?accountid=32521…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    D 'elia, C.. (2010). Less than We Might: Meditations on Life in Prison Without Parole. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 23(1), 10-20. Retrieved December 17, 2010, from Research Library. (Document ID: 2161498561).…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (1) Capital Punishment, or execution, the sentence of death upon a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense committed.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you know what the electric chair is? Is it a chair that is guaranteed death, a chair that kills all of our corrupted criminals, or is it much more than that? The electric chair is called the “Strap-o-lounger,” the “Barcalounger,” the “we care chair” and the “be sweet chair” by jail and prison employees. Yet, the inmates and their lawyers call it the “Torture chair,” the “Slave chair,” and the “Devils chair.”(Cusac, Anne Marie) Is the electric chair even a fair death penalty or is it too much? Why and how do we even use the electric chair? Has any executions with the electric chair gone wrong? I will tell you all these answers you want to know.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Has anyone asked your views on capital punishment? The words lethal injection, electrocution, and gas chamber are synonymous with the death penalty. Even in today’s society of die-hard liberals, right-winged republicans, and middle of the road democrats the capital punishment argument is still a squeamish topic that incites strong emotional debate from abolitionists and supporters.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanging, Lethal Injection, Electrocution, Gas Chamber, and Firing Squad are the five methods of execution that were used in the United States. The most commonly used method today in the United States is lethal injection. Only 36 states in the US are authorized to carry out executions (Ecenbarger, 2010).…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty is a big issue in our society today. Many people are confused if the death penalty is right or wrong. I feel that the death penalty should be carried out. I have many reasons why the death penalty should be carried out. The death penalty would save government money and help keep criminal activity under control.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment - Cruel and Unusual? (The Information Series on Current Topics) (Reference Series). Wylie: Information Plus (TX), 1998. Print.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The use of technology in conjunction with scientific forensics has changed much of the way in which cases are handled, reducing, if not nearly eliminating, wrongful convictions (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). Certainly, I can see why you feel so strongly about taking the stance you have with regards to the death penalty. Consequently, I place my faith in the criminal justice system to carry out each investigation to avoid false convictions, moreover, I do support the death penalty in capital cases. Although the cost associated with the prosecution of the offender are significantly higher than that of a regular murder trial that would not sentence the offender to death, the cost of housing the offender for life would be much higher. Incarcerated…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Killing is wrong. It’s something that has been driven into us since childhood its indisputable truth. So why is capital punishment allowed? For those of you that don’t know what capital punishment is, it’s the death penalty the murder of a people in our society who are mentally or emotionally unstable, have anger management issues or simply made a plain mistake. These are many of the reasons that account for the homicides that take place each year, these are people that should have the chance to change yet have those chances taken away from them. Capital Punishment is just not humane and should not be legal.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This topic is a very controversial one. The paper you are about to read could cause intense arguments between some groups of people. All that doesn't matter to me because when you finish reading this, you will agree with me if you don't already.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are thousand punishments to remind criminals for those terrible things they did The laws are made for protect people and country, but more is to let people know the illegal and legal movement. We should punish criminals to let them realize their mistakes and learn a lesson. Laws and punishments are protecting us in the mean time they are teaching us. Death penalty executes criminals ,how can they learn their lesson if they die , what can they do to pay for their mistakes. In my opinion we should abolish the death penalty , everyone deserves a second chance to better their lives. I believe if a person live on the world whatever how bad he is we should give him a light of hope to lead him to a better life, the death penalty is going to end all these possibility he will get in the future , and the only thing he has is despair. People is changeable, those hateful criminals could be good if we give them a chance. It is humanitarianism to abolish the death penalty ,we should respect every life in the world.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays