Preview

Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty
Death Penalty
Nate Tomilonus
POS 2041-American National Government
Essay Number 3
11/24/14
657 words I personally believe the death penalty is far too harsh of a punishment for an individual then needed.

I personally believe the death penalty is far too harsh of a punishment for an individual then needed. I believe life in prison is the correct response. Life in prison not only gives the individual a chance to change but it also shows them a new perspective on life. On the other side, prison also tortures the person, considering prison is hell on earth. It also has them spend there rest of their life, knowing they will never be able to get out. But on the other hand the death penalty does strike fear into people. Which this has them second guess there decisions. It also keeps are prisons from being over stocked. The death penalty not only takes away a life but also tears apart family. At least with the prison for life aspect, family members will still be able to see them. The death penalty also acts as a revenge tactic which is not a good example for our country. The death penalty is a very controversial subject and an important topic as well. One example against the death penalty is; it is very hypocritical. How can our nation be so much against murder but then commit the same act? If our nation is attempting to teach us not to murder. Then our nation should refuse to partake in the act. Although the death penalty does strike fear into people. Because the thought of being executed is probably far more frightening then life in prison. Yes, some people do say prison is hell on earth. For instance the fact of knowing you will never be free again. Or being surrounded by harmful and senseless people, and also being raped and beaten daily. Prison for life also teaches a lesson to the murderers. If the murderer is put to death, they are taught precisely nothing at all, because they aren’t alive to learn from it. We can’t rehabilitate someone by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a very controversial topic that some may oppose while others assent. I have read two interesting essays about the death penalty. One is entitled “The Penalty of Death” by H.L Mencken and the other “Execution” by Anna Quindlen. Both authors presented their arguments and used great points to support their opinions. H.L Mencken is for the death penalty while Anna Quindlen is against it. After reading these two authors work I was able to form my own opinion on this punishment. I condone the death penalty despite how cruel it may be.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soc120 Week 3

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Therefore I do not believe that this is a price that society is willing to pay, especially when we are talking about killing an innocent person for the sake of catching a person who is guilty. I also believe that the death penalty should be abolished in all countries, because no one has the right to kill another human being other than the person who created them, and that 's God.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my personal opinion, I believe the death penalty should be broadened, if anything. People who commit acts of heinous violence have no place in society, (besides prison society) which is costly to us taxpayers, who are also the victims. Murder isn’t the only heinous act. I consider pedophilia to be a heinous act of violence. Whether pedophilia is a mental illness or not is beside that fact, because the torment the victim is left to suffer with for their entire life is reprehensible. These people get a slap on the wrist, and are back out on the street to commit the same heinous acts over and over again. I do believe in the death penalty, and I most certainly believe these people should be on the list to receive…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Title: Point: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished. By: Ballaro, Beverly, Cushman, C. Ames, Points of View: Death Penalty, 2009 Database: Points of View Reference Center…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, violent crimes and murder are inexusable and people who commit these crimes should be adequately punished and removed from society, but the death penalty has too many flaws such as being morally wrong, being carried out inhumanely, the execution of innocent people and the huge financial cost to our society. With all of these reasons, I do not agree with the death…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion after knowing all that is wrong with the death penalty we should rethink of a better way to sentence people that doesn't make us the real criminals for allowing the death penalty to continue that is inhumane, a real cost burden to everybody and an unlawful practice. My suggestion is to completely forbid the death penalty and instead make them serve life in prison for the heinous crimes they committed. The world would be a better place if we all decided that the practice of lethal injection is a barbaric method to make people pay for their crimes and it should be outlawed in today modern…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, let’s take a look at the only current alternative available, life imprisonment. The biggest pro to this alternative is that, despite what you may think, it costs society much less than capital punishment simply because of the lengthy judicial process required for the conviction. Since this is the case, I believe the legislation surrounding the death penalty needs to be revised. ‘’The United States is the world's leader in incarceration with 2.2 million people currently in the nation's prisons or jails -- a 500% increase over the past thirty years. These trends have resulted in prison overcrowding and state governments being overwhelmed by the burden of funding a rapidly expanding penal system, despite increasing evidence that large-scale incarceration is not the most effective means of achieving public safety.’’ (TheSentecingProject.org).…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is nobody on earth that should decide when a person should live or die nobody except God himself. If someone does choose to take a life they should be severely punished. I just think that we could use life without parole instead of death row. This seems more of a logical reason then taking their life completely. This way they would have an opportunity to be rehabilitated even if they did not ever get out of…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The death penalty is unjust and inhumane for nations to carry out. In addition, it is irrational for the United States government to choose to condemn an individual to death. The death penalty should be banned. The main reasons the death penalty must be eliminated is for the inequality of race, gender, and class. The punishment isn’t a crime deterrent, and isn’t cost effective. Also, the potential error within the judicial system with capital punishment leads to the end of an individuals’ life, a punishment which isn’t irreversible were the error to be found. The idea of having a choice to condemn a person to death is barbaric and violates the cruel article in the Bill of Rights.[1] Consider the following example: Gary Graham, a black male, 17 year old was executed on June 23, 2000 for robbery, rape, and the murder of Bobby Lambert, a 53 year old, in 1981.[2] His death believed to be part of the genocide of blacks in America. Errors of the Graham case were the twenty-two other crimes he was accused of, the assumption of the witnesses, and the denied time to determine if Graham should be sentenced to death or put on parole. In the twenty-two crimes Graham was charged for, he pled guilty for 10 cases and crime spree, but pled not guilty for the murder of Bobby Lambert. Acclaimed innocent, Graham fought till his death, pleading the innocence of the many cases he was accused of. His lawyer asked the US Supreme Court, on an act of clemency, to give more time and tried a civil suit which was all denied.[3] More importantly, presidential candidate, George W. Bush, and the Texas governor refused to reprieve the case. Bush’s argument was that the case had been reviewed by thirty three states and federal judges. Another default to the case of Graham was the victims who only spotted 20-30 feet away from the witnesses’ eye.[4] From a face to face line up of the description of the perpetrator, it led to Gary Graham. Two other witnesses were at the scene of the crime, acclaimed…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine waking up one morning and deciding to kill all your classmates at gun point for no apparent reason. At the scene, you were arrested and charged with genocide. You were found guilty and as your punishment you are sentenced to the death penalty; even though, it was your first offense. Wouldn’t you think that putting someone in prison for life would be much more reasonable for their first offence instead of sentencing them to the death penalty? Well, here are some interesting facts about the death penalty.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays