Preview

Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty
Jose R. Doblado
Professor Arana
English Composition I
20 March 2014
Death Penalty Society has always used punishment to discourage what would be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, which is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own lives. The death penalty reminds us that there are consequences to our actions, and that we are responsible for what we do; so that dire consequences for immoral actions are eminently appropriate. The death penalty is such a fitting response to evil. However, our reliance upon the death penalty “quick fix” for our violent crime problem diverts us from a sober and realistic approach based on facts and logic. IN DEFENSE: The death penalty can prevent crimes, may deter potential murderers, can save lives. Because after the implementation of a punishment to the next crime, which usually do not think that will be discovered and punished, they will know the consequences of their actions and may lose his own life, being punished by the government, and thus so think twice before committing. AGAINST: When someone takes a life, the balance of justice is disturbed. Unless that balance is restored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. Only the taking of the murderer's life restores the balance and allows society to show convincingly that murder is an intolerable crime which will be punished in kind. Retribution has its basis in religious values, which have historically maintained that it is proper to take an "eye for an eye" and a life for a life. IN DEFENSE: Using the death penalty in cases in order, is a way to protect citizens' lives, as this would be entirely safe to do them. Since it is a way to not run the risk that the criminal to commit his crime again, and providing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In his paper, “The Minimal Invasion Argument Against the Death Penalty”, Hugo Adam Bedau argues against the death penalty. Bedau’s purpose is to convince people to favor the lifetime imprisonment over the death penalty with an argument that had been previously used by other authors called “The minimal Invasion Argument”, which he considers to be “the best argument against the death penalty”(Bedau, 4). In this paper I will describe Bedau’s argument and show how he has some weaknesses addressing the concept of the minimal invasion argument by ignoring what in my opinion is the main reason why the death penalty has not been abolished; this reason being our incapacity as humans to “define” our environment. When we call one thing by a name we believe this thing is the name by which we have called it. For example when we call somebody a criminal we take away many of the characteristics that make us equal to the criminal and then just call him or her a criminal. With this essay I want to prove that in some cases as human beings we need to believe in re-definition, in change; all this in order to build a better society. To do this I will first explain Bedau’s argument as best as possible and then conclude with the issues I found on it that are based on our language as the interpreter of our world.…

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    " To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice" ( qtd. in Anti-Death Penalty). Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been around in some sort of variation for centuries. It is enforced upon criminals who have been convicted of the most heinous crimes, such as homicide. There have been debates throughout time as whether or not the death penalty is appropriate punishment. Valid arguments of support and contradiction of capital punishment have come up over time, making citizens believe it is a tough decision for lawmakers to choose whether or not to allow the death penalty. The decision is simple. Capital Punishment should be abolished throughout the country because it is an unfair and unnecessary way of castigation that contains many flaws and serves no justice for those involved.…

    • 3007 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy.…

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The death penalty can be considered a benefit towards criminals for many reasons. A person who has nothing to lose can think to himself or herself that they can…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 3552 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The question regarding whether the United States should implement the death penalty as a form of punishment is a heated issue in American politics. The topic is so divisive because it deals with death, which is permanent. Life is valued in every society, and when life is taken away, emotions rise. Most human beings maintain a strong underlying fear of dying, so they wish to prevent their own death, especially their murder, at any cost. Furthermore, since crime is a prevalent problem in the U.S., Americans yearn for a successful way to reduce the homicide rate. However, most Americans do not favor the use of the death penalty when other options, such as life in prison without parole plus restitution, are presented (Dieter). By comparing the empirical and moral claims of the arguments in favor and against the use of the death penalty, we suggest that the presidential candidate take a cautiously anti-death penalty stance.…

    • 3552 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime is a plague that our nation faces on a daily basis. Theft, assault, and kidnapping are just a few common crimes. What about the crimes that are much more gruesome? The murders and rapes that happen throughout our country need proper sentences and this is where the death penalty comes in. Though there are many people for and against the penalty itself, I’m not here to discuss that. I’m here to discuss the argument of whether or not the death penalty should take the length of time that it usually does.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is one of the most controversial topics of modern day. There are many people on both sides of the fence in this heated debate. I, personally, am pro death penalty for many reasons. The death penalty is a dire part of the U.S. criminal justice system that should not be extinguished. There is irrefutable proof on why we need the death penalty. The problem with the death penalty is it needs to be reformed. Death penalty reform is the sine qua non of an effective compromise.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Consequentialist arguments: the deterrence argument, the prevention argument, economic arguments, effectiveness of the judicial and penal systems…

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros of the Death Penalty is establishing consequences for Capital Crimes, they established final consequences for convicts that cannot be sustained nor act lawfully. One of the biggest advantages to keep the death penalty is to prevent the crime from recurring again. Death Penalty sentencing adequately considered an advantage of the death penalty that is critical and adequate considerations are made before judgment is made for death penalty sentencing. Methodology for preventing criminal crimes is also an advantage of the death penalty is that the death penalty serves as a methodology for preventing capital crimes. In having the highest interest to prevent murder within society, it is understandable to implement the strongest punishment available…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime is a part of everyday life and everyone is aware of the threat it possesses, but the question lies in the methods in which it should be dealt with. A major issue in today’s society is whether or not the death penalty is a proper form of punishment. Many people have different opinions on the issue because of its many pros and cons. The arguments against the death penalty show that executions are more expensive than life in prison, the innocent may be wrongly accused, and it is not a deterrent to crime.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As you can see, many points can be made about the death penalty. Some in favor of the death penalty and some opposed. The death penalty can lead to some beneficial outcomes including a crime deterrent both on the streets and in the jails. I believe that the arguments in favor of the death penalty are…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Sppech

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another good reason why the death penalty should be used in our society is to protect our loved ones against horrible deaths by murder. As Edward I. Koch explains, human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to ensure that protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again, and only the death penalty can accomplish this end.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays