The words “Death Penalty” stirs up a lot of controversy now-a-days. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. One is either all for it or completely against it. Conservatives believe in an eye for an eye, while Liberals says execution is a cruel and unusual punishment. If anything can be agreed on, it’s that crime rates are going up, it’s a threat to society and something must be done about it. But the question is: How it should be dealt with? The death penalty was created back in Eighteenth Century B.C, and to this day it is used as punishment for murder and other serious crimes. The death penalty has many issues in and of itself. A lot of money and time goes into carrying out a death sentence. On top of that, there is a chance that innocent people could be killed for something that they didn’t do. Some might argue and say the death penalty is immoral and is a form of cruel and unusual punishment where people suffer both emotionally and physically before their execution. They might also say that the death penalty is a violation of the Eighth Amendment which states that the U.S cannot use cruel and unusual punishment. However, the purpose of the entire criminal justice system is to protect the rights of life, liberty, and property for all its citizens. To do this, the punishment for the crime must be harsh enough for the criminal and others to know that the crime won’t be taken lightly. With this mindset, the death penalty makes perfect sense because the death penalty is a punishment that truly makes a criminal pay for his crime, stops the criminal from committing it again, and prevent other criminals from committing the same crime. The punishment for murder is getting to be shorter and shorter. For example, a judge could sentence a man to life in prison and that same man could be out of jail with 15 years. How has life in jail become known as ten to fifteen years? If the judge says life with no parole, then the criminal could stay in jail a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document