Preview

Death penalty

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death penalty
Pros and Cons of Death Penalty
PROS:
1. Taxpayer dollars are no longer going to support the care for these heinous individuals. Also helps to reduce the overpopulation problems in our prisons.

2. Harsh punishment of this kind would serve as a deterrent for future crimes committed.

3. Peace of mind can be brought to those families devastated by these criminals, with the safety of knowing that these people have no possibility of hurting again.

4. With new technology and DNA testing, we can be extra certain that the true criminal will be put to death.

5. A criminal on death row has a chance to prepare his death, make a will, and make his last statements while some victims can never do it.

CONS:

1. In reality the cost of the execution process and the many appeals is far greater than a life in prison sentence.

2. The “deterrent” theory is debatable. Serial killers, rapists, molester would rarely consider their potential demise via Capital Punishment prior to committing crimes. Criminals usually operate with the belief they will not be caught.

3. Putting to death a criminal can’t “un-do” the crimes they have committed. Perhaps a better use of funding could be put toward prevention of similar crimes by potential offenders and training Special Forces to detect threats.

4. There is always the possibility that innocents could be convicted and put to death. Many of these people may also be mentally ill.

5. Fear of death does not reduce crime. Crimes are increasing drastically till this day. Criminals see other murderers in the state get away with murder, so they too, can get away with it.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2) I think it is very important that we reexamine past cases because of the improvements. It is very unfair for those who have been imprisoned due to the inadequate technology. The disadvantage to this is that old cases means old evidence that may not be of any use because of the case's age. Samples may have dried up etc.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finally, there is the issue of the effectiveness and fairness of the death penalty. There have been countless cases to come before the courts, alleging that there are innocent individuals on death row and that this is an act that cannot be reversed if the criminal allegations prove to be untrue. Adding to the issue is that the death penalty costs the state and ultimately society, millions of dollars to process a capital punishment. Most of the offenders on death row, challenge the process at every step of the judicial process and in doing so likely waste considerable resources as often the end result remains the same, barring new evidence.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is assumed to deter crime. Yet, Sstudies in 2012 decisively showed that murder is 30% more likely to occur in states implementing the death penalty.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allows those who deserve such a punishment get the penalty these deserve instead of wasting our tax money on housing all the inmates in the prisons.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cons of the death penalty are many, and often talked about more then the pros. Some of the cons consist of accidental sentencing, believing in human morals, there is more pre-trial time, more experts, twice as many attorneys, two trials will have to be conducted instead of one. One for sentencing, and one for punishment. There will be a series of appeals in which the inmates will have to be kept in a high security ‘death row’.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty uses an unnecessary amount of America’s budget. The amount of money we spend on the death penalty could be put to better use. “Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 more than an ordinary…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Furthermore, both proponents and opponents argue over crucial aspects about Capital Punishment like deterrence, morality and retribution, incapacitation and rehabilitation, the cost, and the potential risk of executing an innocent person. Capital Punishment, according to proponents, deters potential murderers because they will fear receiving the death penalty themselves. According to Jennifer C. Honeyman and James R. Ogloff, both are lawyers and James Ogloff has worked as a psychologist for thirty years, in Capital punishment: arguments for life and death, “deterrence is used to suggest that executing murderers will decrease the homicide rate,” or “general deterrence” (3). By executing the murderer, the death penalty ensures he or she cannot…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. Punishment is supposed to be a temporary penalization for a wrongful action. Death is far from temporary.…

    • 132 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reason 3- Presuming that capital punishment is allowed the punishment should fit the crime because it makes sure that violent criminals will not commit crimes again.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that’s been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972-1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years Later in 1969 where the United States had zero executions, their were 14,590 murders. After only 2 executions since 1976, murders rised to 23,040. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, It would put fear of capital punishment into the "would be" murderers. A person is less likely to commit a crime if they believe that they will be punished for their criminal act.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty has been most talked about for years, to some it is an unfair way to pass judgment on a person. The argument went as far as to say that conforming to such a method is a step backwards and offers no real solution. Critic Coretta Scott King argued strongly against the practice and rebukes the idea. One can always say what they want about the matter but insufficient knowledge with hinder their judgment. The death penalty ought to be considered as a means of punishment for those who commit ghastly murders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death penalty

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By using death as punishment the government also impinges upon its own human rights: Article 3 of the human rights, established by the United Nations and signed by the USA says: Every human being has the right of live, of freedom, and of personal safety.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The death penalty can be considered a benefit towards criminals for many reasons. A person who has nothing to lose can think to himself or herself that they can…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate for many years. The following essay will not solve the issue either; I will only try to persuade the reader to understand my point of view. The death penalty has both supporters and non-supporters. The death penalty is justified in certain cases such as Mcveigh Vs State of Indiana; however it is unjustified when in other cases, including Bloodsworth Vs State of Maryland. The death penalty is a must, especially in today 's society. With the increase in vicious crimes today, the government must act just as harsh with our justice system to try and prevent these types of crimes. Non-supporters argue that the death penalty is inhumane and should be considered murder. People of this malicious caliber must be dealt with in the same way, an eye for an eye. Putting these criminals to death doesn 't solve the crime that they committed, but it helps the victim 's family and friends to feel a sense of justification for what 's happened to them.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays