top-rated free essay

Death Penalty

By jerryclk Feb 24, 2013 906 Words
Death Penalty
In Taiwan, whether to abolish or retain death penalty was a big controversial question in recent years. The people who consent to abolish death penalty argue that it is an international trend to abolish death penalty because criminals like kill another person should still be protected by the Constitution, but the people who oppose to abolish death penalty believe that Taiwan's judicial system is tolerant enough towards the suspects. Therefore, in consideration of social peace and how the victim’s families feel, the criminals deserve the death penalty and it should not be abolished easily. Five years ago, Taiwan’s Former Minister of Justice did not want to accept the laws to run the death penalty in the death row, and this thing caused big discussion between abolish or retain death penalty. The people in Taiwan think should not abolish death penalty for three reasons: to protect human rights, to abolish death penalty will cause an increase of crime, and to keep death penalty can reduce the social costs. There are three points of human rights about why should not abolish death penalty. First, each one of us is unique and special. Because we are all equal, why should the murderer not pay with his own life when he takes away his victims? People who commit a crime should shoulder their faults and judgment instead of asking for their life rights. When someone is sentenced to death, it means the crime that did is so serious and need to use his/her life to compensate. The pros of abolish death penalty think the death penalty will deprive the right to life of the death inmates, but the right to life of victims and other people should not be ensure? Second, every person has a right to safe living environment. If Taiwan abolishes the death penalty, it may seem that the government indirectly encourages people to kill others because the criminals do not need to pay for what they have done. The sudation will make people live without a peace of mind. The Chinese have a saying,“an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.”(Code of Hammurabi) The way of doing a thing can let people get a safe right of living environment. Finally, victims' families' needs are met by the death penalty. People must think about the lives that a murdered victim affected. Everyone has families, friends, relatives, and co-workers. The combined loss is incalculable. The death penalty is based on the requirements of justice, and gives a good way for the victims and their families. In short, we need to reserve the death penalty for reducing the dread of people of being killed, and protecting the human right of every victim. In addition to human rights, abolish in the death penalty will result in an increase of crime for three reasons. (Does Death Penalty Save Lives? A New Debate, New York Times, November 18, 2007) The strongest reason is that the death penalty can prevent others from committing crime because severe punishment can always frighten and hinder people doing illegal things, such as murder or serious sexual abuse. Also, if a small number of perpetrators who commit heinous crimes are not sentenced to death, the offenders may commit crimes to other people again. Finally, the government in Taiwan should offer a safe place to live. A lot of people sat the death penalty should be preserved because people will be scared that they will become the next victims if that terrible killer is still around. People in Taiwan want a safe living environment. They do not want to abolish death penalty and let the crimes addition, and then they would not have a safe place to live. So if the government in Taiwan abolishes the death penalty, people who want to commit crime would think that even committed heinous crimes, they can still escape death. Crime would be increase, so keeping the death penalty is necessary. The death penalty is cost-effective because the government does not need to spend a lot of money and materials to support the heinous. (To execute or not: A question of cost? MSNBC. Retrieved 5 February 2012) There are three points to support the reason. To abolish death penalty may make people lose confidence in the laws, might have caused the phenomenon of private revenge. If private revenge often happens, the social will become turbulent and need more money to keep social peace. Then alternative to the death penalty with life imprisonment will increase the prison costs. Why people should use the taxes to keep a serious fender? So, when the prisoners without the possibility of repentance and the absolute necessity of the society of lifelong isolation, to support the prisoners to die of old age is just to waste the national resources. Third, every national legal system is not the same. If the government in Taiwan rushes into abolishes the death penalty to line with international trends, it may result in confusion in the judicial system. Who will respond in the social costs? In brief, to abolish death penalty in Taiwan now will make people not believe the law, improve the cost of prison, and make social become not peace. To summarize, to protect the right of safe living in Taiwan, to prevent of crime increase, and to cost down the social costs. The death penalty in Taiwan should not be abolished.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Death Penalty Pros and Cons

    ... Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The death penalties are usually carried out for retribution of a heinous murder committed, such as aggravated murder, felony killing or contract killing. Every state handles what method they want to use to put...

    Read More
  • Pro death penalty

    ...Crime The death penalty is a form of punishment used for convicted criminals who have committed a capital crime. Initially, the first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the city-state of Babylon. The death penalty was used for about 25 different crimes stated in the Hammaurabi Code. By the Tenth C...

    Read More
  • Death Penalty Argument Essay

    ...Gianunzio May 23rd, 2014 Research Essay: Rough Draft Death Penalty: Unlawful An ancient proverb provides that “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”, while the Code of Hammurabi in the 18th century B.C. likewise says that “if a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out, if he break another man’s bone, his bone sha...

    Read More
  • Death Penalty

    ...OUTLINE THESIS: Is the death penalty right or wrong? Advocates for the death penalty and abolitionist against the death penalty have debated this issue since the inception of capital punishment. Advocates supporting foundation for the death penalty is that it is deterrence because it prevents future murders; and that in the death penalty serves...

    Read More
  • Death Penalty

    ...John Vera English 101H Professor Kaufman 23 October 2014 Is the Death Penalty Actually Effective? Of the many crimes one could commit, murder, felony manslaughter, espionage, genocide, and treason are a few of the crimes that can lead to one paying with the ultimate price, their own life. Lethal injection, gas chamber, firing squad, electrocu...

    Read More
  • Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment

    ...Death Penalty and The Eighth Amendment The expression "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" has taken on a whole new meaning. Lately, murderers have been getting a punishment equal to their crime, death. In 1967, executions in the United States were temporarily suspended to give the federal appellate courts time to decide whether or not th...

    Read More
  • Death Penalty Argument

    ... One of the most common, and controversial arguments in today’s society is the use of the death penalty as punishment. Capital punishment is considered paying the ultimate consequence for your actions. Some argue it is inhumane and too harsh of an action to take, while others applaud the justice system for implementing it for certain crimin...

    Read More
  • Critical Analysis of Edward Koch's Essay, "Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life"

    ...In Edward I. Koch's essay, "Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life", readers view the opinions Koch has toward the death penalty in today's world. Koch reviews a variety of excuses to abolish the death penalty. He argues the importance of the death penalty, as well as, argues excuses of the death penalty opponents. He argues the ...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.