Death of Patent

Topics: Copyright, Intellectual property, Trademark Pages: 21 (5756 words) Published: October 20, 2014

Intellectual Property



Intellectual property
3D Technology, also referred to us addictive manufacturing is the process of forming 3 solid objects that are dimensional and are made from a digital file. Addictive process occurs when an object is formed by putting down many successive layers of materials. 3D printed guns are functional plastic guns that can be easily reproduced by any individual that has a printer with 3D functions. The printer allows for easy downloading of many plastic guns as possible. It also allows the downloading of the existing plastic gun designs that are used for printing the actual plastic guns. As long as an individual has the knowledge of printing and assembling through 3D you are good to go, however there have been claims that the technology is not that easy because as much as it is easy to print the plastic gun, you cannot do the same with the ammunition that will be used in the gun. 3D plastic guns are a big threat both to a country’s security and the implementation of patent rights. The security will be affected much in countries where acquiring a gun is not easy like England, hence people will take the advantage and print their own guns to use them however they please. The congress man, Rep Steve Israel is against the printing of the 3D plastic guns and of the view that they should be banned because they cannot be detected easily by the metal detectors posing a huge security risk. This is not easy because, banning the guns will not help much as long as the 3D printers are still in existence. Many analysts claim that this will only interfere with the business of 3D printers which are lawfully in existence and also have patent, trademark and copyright protection rights. Apart form being unlawful, it lacks vision and cannot be argued in a court of law, hence need to amend the intellectual property laws to fit in the advancing technology being witnessed in 3D printing and scanning ,that can easily be accessed by virtually everybody ( Hart & Clark. 2014). Technology is advancing everyday and very soon the 3D technology will be in a position to produce a 3D printer that can be afforded by consumers to use in their homes, giving them an opportunity to manufacture many things on their own and in the comfort of their homes. This will extensively challenge the Intellectual property legislation and serious amendment needs to be done to keep up with the advanced technology. In previous decades, product designers produced detailed drawings that had multiple products to be viewed, which led to skilled machine operators to manufacture the products. Computer technology however has made it possible to design products using computer programs. The computer programs have led to the creation of design models in 3D form that produce products and manufacture the products that can be machined, from the selected materials. Technology in 3D scanning was developed to carry out inspection of the actual products manufactured, and the scanned data helped in ascertaining the quality of the products through control checks that were done against the design models in 3D form (David, 2009). The possibility of allowing clients to print certain products at the comfort of their homes using online database, will force experts in laws of intellectual property to come up with a well thought plan to protect manufacturers rights. In the case of the 3D gun and even toy cars where a consumer upon getting the 3d model design of the gun or toy through scanning, can produce many duplicate copies of the toy cars and plastic guns being sold in the market, brand them differently and sell them as his own. This will have an impact on the copyrights, patent and trademark laws. The copyright law protects the design of the 3D plastic guns and the works of the original manufacturer, expressed in a fixed and tangible way. Copyright laws are used to protect the design oriented...

References: David, R. (2009).Culture vs. rights; 12th edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Rothaermel, F (2012). “Intellectual property Rights and their impact on economy”, 2nd Edition, New Jersey: McGraw-Hill.
Lessig, L. (2004). “Free culture: The nature and future of creativity”, 3rd Edition, New York, Hazard Printing press.
Kinsella, S. (2004), “Against Intellectual Property”, 3rd edition, London, Lambert Academic Publishing.
Party, W. (2011). “How to fix Copy right”, 2nd Edition, New Jersey, McGraw-Hill.
Boldan, M. (2009). “Against Intellectual monopoly”, 4th edition, New York, Hazard Printing press.
Mennell, P. (2014). “Intellectual property, Innovation and the Environment”, 3rd Edition, London, Lambert Academic Publishing.
Clark, S. & Hart, T. (2014). “Intellectual Property Law”, 6th Edition, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Death
  • Patents Essay
  • Patent Act Essay
  • Patent Law Essay
  • Copyrights and Patents Essay
  • Patent Troll Essay
  • Patents Essay
  • Essay about Patent Warfare

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free