Preview

Death

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death
Wafeeq Mujahid
November 21, 2012
ELA 9

Does death cause change in people and its surroundings? A French poet once said, “All changes, even the most longed for, have their melancholy; for what we leave behind us is a part of ourselves; we must die to one life before we can enter another (Anatole France).” What does this mean though? I believe it means that change is a result of death, physically or mentally. In The Book Thief death causes changes in the characters and the setting. Liesel Meminger, the main character was a young girl who had already changed so much because of death. Her brother died in her arms, her best friend Rudy died, and her foster mother and father whom she had grown to love very much, died in the same house, just a room away. And these things all happened on Himmel Street, which means Heaven believe it or not. “I guess by now I should know enough about loss to realize that you never really stop missing someone-you just learn to live around the huge gaping hole of their absence.”(Alyson Noel) Liesel isn’t the only character who has to deal with death. During the beginning of The Book Thief, Frau Holtzapfel is Rosa Hubermans next door neighbor and worst enemy. Every time Frau passes the Hubermans house, she spits on their door and swears at them. This all changes when Frau hears Liesel read The Whistler while waiting in the bomb shelter. Frau loses both of her sons. Her sons Michael and Robert were both sent to Stalingrad. Robert her younger son dies in Stalingrad after losing both of his legs in an explosion. Frau’s other son, Michael, takes his own life because he felt guilty for living. He felt guilty that he didn’t die instead of his brother, death made him feel guilty, death changed his thoughts about living, and death is what became of him.
Max, a Jewish fist fighter who lived in the Hubermans basement, became a brother to Liesel. Max was on brink of death for a while. He would sleep for days without waking up. Rosa Huberman is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Liesel Part 2 Summary

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He is greeted by Hans. The narrator explains that Hans was friends with Max’s father, Erik, in the war. It is because of Erik that Hans did not die in the war’ Hans promised Erik wife a favor, anytime, because her husband saved his life. His favor would now be keeping Max safe.The story flashes back again, to tell us about Max. Like Liesel he was one to fight other children. One of his many opponents, Walter, he became very close with. Walter shows to his house one night to help Max escape. He quickly says goodbye to his mother and family and is taken to a storeroom to hide. He will live there for the next 2 years. It is Walter who gives him Mein Kampf and the identity to go to Molching. In present time, Rosa feeds him pea soup and gives him the bed that was meant for Liesel’s brother. Hans takes Liesel down to the basement to explain their predicament to her. He tells Liesel not to tell anyone or they will all be taken away and will never see each other again. The family slowly becomes used to having Max around and accommodating him the best they can; they let him sleep by the fire when winter comes, they give him a mattress, and they give him more than scraps for food, though food is tight for them already. Liesel and Max bond over nightmares; they both have them routinely. Come her birthday, Max fails to give her a gift and bans her from the basement for a week. After the week, he presents her with a handmade book, The Standover Man, about all the people in his…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The Book Thief’ by Mark Zusak The Book Thief is a story of a young german girl named Liesel Meminger in Nazi Germany during world war 2. At age nine her brother drops dead in front of her and when Death himself comes to collect his newest soul, he becomes fascinated with Liesel. From then on death narrates the story of a girl who moves into a foster home where she develops relationships between her new Papa and Mama, her best friend Rudy, her secret friend Max, but most importantly we witness her relationship with books and words that take her on a journey though life. Using your prescribed text, examine what the composer of this text reveals about Changing Perspectives and how they convey these ideas (750 words). It is expected that you will identify and analyse at least 2 techniques /forms /features. Use the PETAL structure to help you remain analytical. Mark Zusak reveals the concept of Changing Perspectives in his book ‘The Book Thief’ through how he has personified Death as the narrator. He does this in such a way that causes the reader to reconsider their thoughts on ‘what’ death is, and to then ask themselves about ‘who’ death is. The idea of who death is, is challenged when Zusak writes, “Yes, I know it. In the darkness of my dark-beating heart, I know. He’d have loved it all right. You see? Even death has a heart.” (p262) Truncated sentences are used here to help quickly convey to the audience the new aspect of who death as a personified character is. Emotive language used by death in this quote allows the audience to see a compassionate side of death that is not normally explored in other texts. Death also states in this quote about how he has a heart which also makes the audience reconsider and change their perspectives of death…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, Liesel evolves from a lonely character that had nobody to a character who creates many incredible bonds with her new family and friends. Even though Liesel has a hard time trusting and allowing herself to vulnerable, she easily starts an incredible and amazing bond with her foster father, Hans Hubermann. When Liesel was getting to know him, “Liesel observed the strangeness of her foster father’s eyes. They were made of kindness, and sliver... Upon seeing those eyes, understood that Hans Hubermann was worth a lot” (Zusak 34). No one has ever played her music, and no one has ever taught her how to read till Hans came along. No one has ever cared for her like Hans has. This is why Liesel loves Hans the most out of everybody. Liesel also starts an amazing and a heartwarming relationship with Max Vandenburg, who is a Jew surviving in Hubermann’s basement. “You could say argue that Liesel Meminger had it easy. She did have it easy compared to max Vanderburg... anything was better than being a Jew.” (Zusak 161). Liesel was a lost girl who had nobody till her new family found her. Max has also lost his family but he is also by the Nazis. Liesel and Max are both broken people living in a broken world. They both have lost many important things in their lives, this is what makes them bond really easily. Liesel did not care that Max was Jewish; they still create…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Killings

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Herbert R. Coursen, Jr., “A Parodic Interpretation of ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’” (1117-1118)…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killings

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Killings” was written by the late Andre Dubus in 1979 (Dubus). According to the article “Andre Dubus,” often the characters that Dubus portray are in tense situations and “sometimes their frustration goads them to infidelity or acts of violence; more often, however, they simply become resigned to their lot” (Contemporary Authors Online par. 9). On the other hand, Matt revenge to committing his murder, which showed loss and consequences are explored in Andre Dubus's, "Killings". A jealous husband, angered by the fact that his estranged wife is involved in a new relationship, acts out in a presumable crime of passion and murders the man she was seeing. As a result of this crime, a father suffers the loss of his son and plots retaliation, which results in the killing of his son's murderer. His “id” was a very jealous husband that didn’t want his wife to be with another man, whereas on the other hand he cared and loved his family. I feel like he didn’t want the sense of betrayal so he chooses to commit a murder. Both men experience a loss and subsequently act out in revenge. The difference in the moral character of these two men is what appears to determine the fate of their consequences.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Book Thief Essay

    • 1395 Words
    • 4 Pages

    through, as Liesel made friends, like her best friend and unknown lover, Rudy Steiner. As Liesel…

    • 1395 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DEATH AND DYING

    • 755 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two examples of moral issues affecting health care are that some pharmacists feel they can refuse filling prescriptions for birth control because they feel it is wrong and I feel that is a moral issue for the fact it is just an opinion of…

    • 755 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Tuesdays with Morrie” and “The Death of Ivan Ilych” both portray a character who is dealing with a serious terminal illness and advance knowledge of their deaths. One story is based on the realistic life of an American professor with the story’s characteristics tone from the 1990’s while the other is set during nineteenth century Russia. Even though Morrie Schwartz and Ivan Ilych both suffered from the illness, their dissimilar lifestyles and beliefs led to different perspective on facing death. One views the knowledge as a blessing and an opportunity to share his life experiences before making his final good-byes, the other agonizes in pain and begs for an end to his vicious sentence of suffering. These two men show contrasts in their identical fates, but only one of them was able to find a way to love.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia should be legalized to allow terminally ill patients the opportunity to prepare for their deaths, avoid unnecessary pain and die with dignity. Euthanasia is “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” (Am. Heritage) The literal meaning of the word euthanasia, "‘an easy or happy death,’ from the Greek word eu- ‘good’, and thanatos ‘death’"(Harper), is proof in itself that the whole idea is to help people and not to belittle the value of life. The fact that suffering animals can be put out of their misery, but suffering people are forced to stay alive and endure the pain, is inhumane. Legalizing euthanasia would be no more than an act of mercy allowing medical personnel to bring slow, painful deaths to a halt.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death and Grief

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Use of symbolism- what do these meaning mean to how lives change, stay the same or how we must adapt…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is a Good Death?

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Death be not proud'. And death shall be no more,', comma, "Death thou shalt die.' 'Nothing but a breath, a comma, separates life from life everlasting. With the original punctuation restored, death is a comma. A pause. In this way, one learns something from the poem, wouldn't you say? (Wit).'" These are lines from the renowned play Wit, when Vivian Bearing, the main character, learns John Donne's Holy Sonnet 10, but misses the meaning of the sonnet and the main idea that her professor emphasizes. John Donne did not even write this Holy Sonnet until he himself was near to death from typhoid fever. It was not until Vivian experienced the dying process for herself that she truly grasped the meaning behind John Donne's sonnet. Similarly, I believe that a true understanding of death, or better yet, a ‘good death’ does not fully come until you are faced with the dying process yourself. Even though I am not facing the dying process, I have an obscure outline of what I think I would value towards the end of my own life at this point in my life, which I will discuss first. Secondly, I will discuss what those with more expertise believe about what a ‘good death’ is. Lastly, I will show the importance of defining a ‘good death’ when dealing with effectively caring for the dying. Even though I can only speculate about what I consider to be a ‘good death’, I argue that a ‘good death’ is the form of death that most people would choose for themselves (including the authors from class) which is important because defining a ‘good death’ is the first step in understanding what value at the end of life to improve palliative care for those who do have a say in how they are treated at the…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death and Dying

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death is a normal process of life. From the moment we are born we begin to age until we die. Kubler-Ross formulated a series of stages that a person goes through when they die. First is denial, according to Kubler-Ross it is, “people’s first reaction to news of a terminal diagnosis is disbelief” (Boyd & Bee, 2006, pg 526). Then there is anger, “once the diagnosis is accepted as real, individuals become angry” (Boyd & Bee, 2006, pg 526). From there comes bargaining, “anger and stress are managed by thinking of the situation in terms of exchanges” (Boyd & Bee, 2006, pg 526). Next there is depression, “Feelings of despair follow when the disease advances despite the individual’s compliance with medical and other advice” (Boyd & Bee, 2006, pg 526). Finally there is acceptance, “grieving for the losses associated with one’s death results in acceptance” (Boyd & Bee, 2006, pg 526). Many researchers have found that Kubler-Ross’s stages may not necessarily go in the exact order or have all of the stages (Boyd & Bee, 2006, pg 527).…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Suicide

    • 6595 Words
    • 27 Pages

    * Davison, G. C., Kring, A. M., Neale, J. M., (2004). Abnormal Psychology. 9th Edition. River Street, Hoboken: John Wiley & sons Inc, Pp 304-316.…

    • 6595 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Death of One's Own

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The documentary “A Death of One’s Own,” was about three individuals that became terminally ill and when it came time they wanted to use physician assisted suicide. All of them died and I believe that two of them would have been considered a “good death,” which is when a person dies in a way that they would wish to and in a comfortable state and place.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays