Dbq on Territorial Expansion

Good Essays
DBQ

From 1800-1855 many things contributed to the government’s policies towards territorial expansion, the most important ones being supporters of this behavior increased trade with Asia, and dislike towards Mexico, that helped with the addition of new states.

The 1803 Louisiana Purchase helped start the Era of Good Feelings because it marked the beginning of the downfall of the Federalists. The Federalists opposed expansion because they feared that new territories would drain off their New England population and compete with New England economically. Between 1800 and 1823 the Louisiana Purchase and the Treaty of 1818 boosted national unity. First, the Louisiana Purchase boosted unity because it helped start the Era of Good Feelings.In the time between 1800 and 1850 America experienced a difference in national unity. Territorial expansion also had a huge effect on national unity in this time period.

The first debate over the issue of territorial expansion began when Missouri wanted to join the union as a slave state. Missouri, which was part of the Louisiana Purchase, which was part of the Northwest Ordinance. The Northwest Ordinance stopped slavery in the Northwest Territories. In 1817, when Missouri applied to the Union as a slave state, the issue of anti-slavery vs. pro slavery came up. In 1819, Maine applied to become a free state. A compromise was then reached, so that Maine would enter as a free state, while Missouri would enter as a slave state, balancing free and slave states. New territories that would enter above the 36’30’ line had to be free

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, not daring to upset the balance between the total number of states with either stance. This law also forbade the extension of slavery into any area north of the 36°30′ latitude line in the…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush 1800's Frq

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although many seemingly happy events such as the “Era of Good Feelings” and the granting of universal white manhood suffrage occurred during the early 1800's, the statement that nationalism and not the fear of sectionalism caused westward expansion is an invalid statement. Westward expansion was truly an effect of a growing sectionalism in the country originating from events such as the Tariff of 1828 , the National Bank, and the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The expansion of the United States from its thirteen original colonies to the nation it is today was a very extensive process, involving numerous wars and treaties. The greatest one of these expansion periods occurred from the 1830s to the 1860s, largely due to the idea of Manifest Destiny, the belief that American settlers were destined to expand across the continent to the Pacific coast. This development played a major role in dividing the North and the South by contributing to contrasting ideologies of the two regions towards social and economic foundations of the new territory, and would eventually lead up to the Civil War, literally dividing the nation into two. Territorial expansion fashioned racial and social divisions in the American society due to slavery, created new enemies for the States as a result of the annexation of Texas against the will of Mexico, and endangered the harmony between the North and the South by cause of the Dred vs. Scott decision.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The Homestead Act was signed into law by President Lincoln in 1862. Many call this act one of the most important laws in United States History. The act allowed for anyone over 21 years of age to claim 160 acres of land via a grant from the federal government. This Act thus also allowed for land to be settled faster in the West. This act then furthered the nation-state of America because it allowed for newly freed blacks and women to start new enterprises and get a shot at the American dream. Beyond that it furthered the unity of the nation state by allowing for land to be settled. The National Banking Act first passed in 1863 and was signed into law by President Lincoln. The Act first was used to raise revenue for the Civil War, which was deeply needed already. It also was designed to get banks to buy federal bonds and rid the United States of state bank-issued currencies. The first act proved did not work so the act was revised in 1864, and made a 10% tax on all state currencies. This allowed for the federal government to have more control over the monetary system of the United States. This, thus allowed for the country to be more united, but also denies states’ rights existed. This ultimately allowing for the Nation-State to be built in economically at a federal level. The Morrill Tariff of 1861 was passed and then signed by President Buchanan. The tariff increased the rate by 5% to 10% and was hated by the south. While it was hated by the south this bill allowed for the second industrial revolution to occur. The second industrial revolution growing the nation-state through economic means. Lastly the government support for the transcontinental railroad was unrivaled in its support of the nation-state. The railroad allowed for the west to be settled and the nation state to expand, and allowed for raw minerals to be…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the question of slavery became more prominent, Congress became more evasive on whether to declare their new territory as pro or anti-slave states. This lead to many disputes between the anti-slavery North and the pro-slavery South. It was such a big controversy because population size determines the number of representatives in the House of Representatives. This means that if the new territory, shown in Doc A, becomes pro-slavery then the amount of pro-slavery representatives would outnumber the anti-slavery representatives in the House of Representatives, which the North was extremely against. Congress ultimately decided to use a process called popular sovereignty which let the inhabitants of the new territory choose for themselves whether to be free or slave to make it fairer. Yet the North still greatly opposed this because, as Doc B states, the new territory was closer to the South and would be inhabited by primarily Southerners so they would still choose to allow slavery, upsetting the balance between free and slave states. Thus, by not outlining clear rules for new land the Constitution created a divide between the Northern and Southern states over slavery that ultimately lead to the beginning of the Civil…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism Project APUSH

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Louisiana Purchase brought much more than land to the U.S. With the presence of France now gone from the states, we rid ourselves of all European interactions within our home. This gave us a sense of freedom. No more influence meant control over us was no longer an issue. We could be free and make decisions on our own. Along with freedom, the purchase brought us economic opportunities. The vast territory was barren – free to be utilized to American benefit. Being able to explore new land and start a new life was appealing to Americans. Due to the fact that the hunt for land was an issue among all citizen, and knowledge that it was now seemingly unlimited, it sparked a nationalistic mindset. Knowing that opportunities were endless, Americans now had a chance to become independent.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over slavery arose again after the Mexican-American War, when Congress had to decide the status of new territory acquired from Mexico. Although the Constitution gave Congress no ability to rid the nation of slavery, it allowed for Congress to determine the qualification future state's admission. This made it possible for a majority of either section to manipulate a new state's status through making the abolition or the protection of slavery necessary for the state to become organized. An earlier compromise in 1820, was the result of a struggle for sectional control over the status of Missouri. Congress choose to appease both sides by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise created a westward line dividing the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state constitution in 1819, was what began of this compromise when James Tallmadge, a representative from New York attempted to add a anti- slavery amendment to the legislation. This gave a ugly and conflicted debate over slavery and the governments rights to restrict slavery. This Tallmadge amendment restricted all further introduction of slaves into Missouri and provided setting free once they reached the age of 25.This legislation was not passed, as the House of Representatives which was controlled by the North passed the idea, but it failed in the Senate which was equally divided between the North and the South. Although the legislation didn't pass it led to Henry Clay taking it on when Maine became a free state.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. Louisiana Purchase: Territory purchased from Napoleon by the U.S. in 1803. The Louisiana Purchase nearly doubled the size of the nation and opened the West to exploration and settlement. But the new acquisition also caused strife: border disputes with foreign powers as well as congressional debates over the admission of new states from the region.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Compromises

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 maintained the balance of slave and free states for 30 years. This kept the North and south satisfied. Missouri was added as a slave state and to sustain the equality between both sides, Maine was carved out of Massachusetts and added as a free state. The compromise also drew in the latitude line of 36° 30’, which permitted all states north of that line to be free (except for Missouri) and all states south of it to be slave states. This line also maintained the states that would allow slaves in the western territories. This compromise clearly delayed the war for 30 years, keeping both sides relatively content.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The acquisitions of the Mexican War triggered an upset in the balance of free and slave states. The solution of extending the Missouri Compromise line of 3630' angered both proslavery and antislavery activists. It upset the proslavery activists because it conceded that Congress could bar slavery in some territories. It angered the antislavery activists because it would allow slavery in New Mexico and southern California. The issue was further aggravated by the acceptance of Texas as a slave state and it claming the eastern half of New Mexico, where slavery had since been outlawed.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Louisiana Purchase

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On April 30,1803 the Louisiana territory, which was a third of the land for the new nation we call America, was purchased from France for fifteen million dollars. This helped fund Napoleon’s war against Great Britain. Thomas Jefferson made this decision because Jefferson did not want any other nation ruling in that territory, because Jefferson did not want to feel threatened with natives from the new land and France trying to take over America. Another reason for this decision was because Congress pressed Jefferson to see if Jefferson wanted to either expand land or have other nations rule in the new mother land. After the purchase was done Thomas Jefferson had requested for the explore Merrieweather Lewis and asked Merrieweather Lewis to go explore the new land. Merrieweather Lewis received help from Sacagawea who translated to other tribes for food and trading Sacagawea taught Lewis and clark how to fish ,hunt and also how to grow crops, Sacagawea taught lewis and clark the basic skills to live off the land to make sure Lewis and Clark could survive off the land . Sacagawea also showed Lewis and Clark how to use other resources to make sure that Lewis and Clark stayed healthy and keep them safe from harm on the excursion through the dangerous native filled land. Sacagawea also showed Lewis and Clark the After Merrieweather Lewis and Clark came back, people started to move west and that is when the population started to grow. The Louisiana Purchase helped the nation grow not only in size but also in population and it helped us to gain new and stronger allies.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The territorial expansion from 1800 to 1850 did not unite the nation, but rather tore it apart. The concept of Manifest Destiny had most citizens believe that the territory of the United States should extend all the way to the Pacific Ocean. Through the expansion of territory the issue of slavery between the North and the South did not unite the nation but rather split it apart.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Compromise of 1850

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Extremists in the South urged that all the lands acquired from Mexico be thrown open to slave holders. Antislavery Northerners, on the other hand, demanded that all the new regions be closed to slavery. One group of moderates suggested that the Missouri Compromise line be extended to the Pacific with free states north of it and slave states to the south. Another group proposed that the question be left to "popular sovereignty," that is, the government should permit settlers to enter the new territory with or without slaves as they pleased and, when the time came to organize the region into states, the people themselves should determine the question.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays