DBQ Federalists and Democratic-Republicans

Good Essays
Thesis: It would appear that the assertion that Democratic-Republicans were strict interpreters of the Constitution while Federalists were not are only somewhat accurate.

The Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval is of particular interest because Jefferson outright states “...I know also, that the laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind”. This is somewhat different from the traditional image of Jefferson interpreting the constitution as absolute under any circumstances. The fact that he himself writes that the constitution must be adapted to the times suggest that Jefferson, like the Democratic-Republican party as a whole, was not such an absolutist. Jefferson also states that “I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions...” which would seem to indicate that He also believed that a change to the constitution was a serious thing not to be taken lightly much like the historical image of the Democratic-Republicans. Jefferson believed that amendments would eventually become necessary to preserve the constitution as a credible document, however he also believed such changes should only be made when absolutely necessary. The fact that this idea about the constitution (that it was not perfect and would eventually need change) contradicts the historical image of strict and absolute interpretation of the constitution that Democratic-Republicans, and by extension Jefferson himself, are given.

-While Jefferson shows sympathy towards eventual change on issues such as slavery he did not follow through in the least as president.
-Jefferson is sometimes portrayed as the first great president by historians.
-Jefferson actually helped sign in the constitution with many of the men who would go on to be federalists.
-Jefferson made many of his statements against slavery and absolute interpretation of the Constitution later in life which could suggest that much of these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    government grew and the nation prospered, the rise of leaders and political figures came about and with this, conflicting principles and ideology spawned, thus creating the first of the political parties; the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Although the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans ideology and stances on the power of the federal government, domestic economic policies and the group of constituents they represented differed vastly, members of both parties often compromised their…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republican side As new problems arose facing the new nation, many different views toward the new conflicts developed. Initially, Hamilton acted aggressively to deal with the new republic's financial troubles with proposals to fund the national debt, create a central banking system and uniform currency, and promote manufacturing with a high protective tariff. Jefferson opposed these policies, objecting to the concentration of power in the hands of bankers and currency speculators. Jefferson believed…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Characterizations of Federalists and Democratic Republicans Throughout time, in reference to the constitution, Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans have been stereotyped as strict constructionists, while Federalists as lose interpreters. The true test of these assumptions is revealed throughout the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, two leading figures of these two political parties. Although Jefferson advocated strict interpretation of the Constitution in his speech his…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways. The Federalists’ envisioned a strong national government due…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parties of Democratic Republican and Federalists extended both strict and loose characterizations of the constitution, that shows the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison were not as much of a stereotype. The Democratic Republicans had many ways of being strict through the constitution and a couple ways of being loose. Along with the Democratic Republicans the Federalists were more strict than loose when it came to the constitution and together both the Democratic Republicans and Federalists shows hoe…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    next president. These parties were the Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. The Federalists were conservative and as a result their beliefs centered on a strong central government. The Democratic Republicans were liberal and supported the rights of states and individuals. The two political parties which formed after Washington's presidency, the Federalist Party and the Democratic Republican Party, expressed the polarized extremes…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the U.S. with permanent political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. When the political parties were created, people they might believed weaken the unity of the U.S., but they checked and balanced each other out to make sure there would be no tyrannical party ruler. As the Federalists interpreted the Constitution loosely, mainly using the elastic clause, they…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    political parties in the United States formed over the ratification of the Constitution, and two opposing groups were immediately created: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Even though the Democratic-Republicans would hold office in the White-House for more than half of the United States first thirty-six years as a nation, it is the Federalists that had a significantly greater effect on the formation of the United States. Their ratification of the Constitution and support of a centralized…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political party of the Federalist believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution, however, the Democratic-Republicans believed in a strict interpretation. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalist party, believed that loosely interpreting the Constitution would help our new country prosper. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, leaders of the Democratic-Republicans, believed that strictly interpreting the Constitution would protect our nation. Both had different views of how to…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays