Preview

Dbq Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
829 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Constitution
Ratifying the Constitution DBQ
“…thirteen powerful, independent, disunited States are in the habit off…refusing to obey our national Congress…I pray that we can act in time to prevent the bad things we fear may happen.” George Washington wrote this in a letter to John Jay (Doc 3). Even the man who is immediately thought of when talking about the start of our nation thought that without a new set of guidelines to run our country by, the young country would eventually break apart and the fighting of the higher powers would begin again. The reasons George thought this way was because of how week the Articles of Confederation actually were, also because all the different foreign problems that the country as a whole faced, and another big reason that he thought this way was because the country was in such a big debt crisis. The Articles of Confederation had left some major issues in the young United States because there was no real central government. The states were much more powerful and unified in very few ways from the very beginning of the country, which was a big problem because at the time the United States faced so many different problems, so to solve this problem a meeting in Philadelphia was arranged to cover the topic of how to about getting the young country headed in the right direction. The direction that was chosen was one to ratify a new document to create strong national government and but also leaving the states with some power for themselves. But this task was not easy because once the deliberations were starting to come to a close there was still the task of convincing people to ratify it, and there were many people who did not like the document, with worries such as “There is no security in the system under the proposed new U.S. Constitution either for the rights of people with different ideas or the liberty of the press.” (Doc. 2). To get the new U.S. Constitution ratified the founding fathers needed to show how it would work better than the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Revolutionary War, originators of the Articles of Confederation had checked that the federal government could never do rob power from the each individual state. The outcome was that the national Congress was very weak and even politically weak which make them not to keep national unity and went almost bankrupt. The specter of rebellion and collapse forced American elites to make a stronger and more centralized government under the Constitution.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was such a week form of government that it would never have kept the 13 very different colonies together. The people during this time were very uneasy and scared as to what would happen next and they knew it was time for change. Change was very frightening and new for all people in the United States and no one knew what to expect, not even the men trying to reform the new government. As John Jay wrote to George Washington "…Our affairs seem to lead to some crisis, some revolution – something that I cannot foresee or conjecture."(Document G). It shows that a change was desperately needed but no one knew how to make a change large that would hold this new country together and stand the test of time.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitution DBQ

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the end of the American Revolution, the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose to how power should be divided between local and national governments, common laws or the protection of the unalienable individual rights. Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely as it formed a template for a new document. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. One of many distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the creation of the legislature. Representation of one state, while disregarding the population of the state, angered many people. The Constitution is known today as the foundation of American government. But before its ratification, debates arose regarding several unresolved and problematic factors that the Articles of Confederation failed to come to a resolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had far more power than did the federal government. As a result, when writing the Constitution, they sought to maintain balance between state and federal power in a way where it would benefit the nation, shifting the power to the federal government. Slavery was never mentioned in the articles, yet the North and the South began a dispute over its existence. Alongside the creation of legislature defining distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, the division of power between state and federal government and the existence and purpose of slavery are issues debated prior to the ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation served as a stepping stone to the United States Constitution, which was later to be written. There were no federal courts, no authority to act directly upon individuals, no power to coerce states, and there had to be unanimous approval of the states for an amendment to be put into action. Unfortunately, the people could not get any help from the government because of the fact that Congress had no power to regulate commerce and that the Articles of Confederation, due to different views, created foreign disputes.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1985 Dbq

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The colonists were living in a brand new country that had no track record. Considering that the articles of confederation had no precedent to follow, and no other government to imitate; the articles were fairly good. However, the Articles of Confederation could have been more effective than they were. Effective does not necessarily mean that the government was strong. It does mean that the government was able to provide the people with the kind of government they wanted and needed. Also, ineffective does not necessarily mean weak. The Articles were deliberately written for a weak central government, the colonists set it up they way they wanted to. Despite the fact that they one the revolutionary war, and they now realized that they were able to work together, they feared that a central government would cause each state to loose the civil rights which they have already gained. Therefore, the colonists deliberately made a weak central government. However, the kind of government which the people set up, through their own will created much uncertainty. The industrious people preferred security and quite and the government held too much uncertainty for them. If there is too much uncertainty, then they will agree to anything that will give them the security that they want. (Document G)…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout these few years, the lack of a central government seemed to be an overwhelming factor when it comes to the effectiveness of this document. A large fault in the Articles is the inability of Congress to create taxes and regulate trade. There is simply no way that a central government can survive without taxes. Also, since the government had no authority over the colonies, they could not force anyone to contribute to the overwhelming war debt caused by the American Revolution. And without their ability to control the colonies, there is no central government. Also, the difficulty to make amendments to the Articles made it almost impossible for anything new to be put into action. With so many different ideals coming from the different parts of the nation, the Articles lacked in that it called for a nine-state majority to make amendments. It seems nearly impractical to try and acquire nine completely different states to agree on one topic, seeing they came from different parts of the country, and thus, making Congress close to nothing. And finally, if the U.S. were to be attacked by Britain again at this time, there would be no way for them to defend themselves, seeing that Congress could only ask states for troops, but could not raise an army. This would have been catastrophic if another country had decided to attack the U.S. for any reason. To sum that up, the inability to create taxes and trade regulations, the difficulty to make amendments, and the inability to rise up an army contributed to the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    After years of struggling to break away from Britain the United States was finally victorious.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My Woll Readings

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of Federalism was debated upon widely during the creation of the Constitution. For example, Federalism was negatively viewed at first because states felt that the federalism would undermine their power and cause a strong central government which would continue the tyranny that the people despised, something which caused them to break away from England in the first place. The passage also brings up desegregation laws that greatly decreased the power of the states since it required the states to conform to the will of the government. This of course angered the states and caused many to wonder how far the power of the government should extend. The passage also talks about the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which included the inability to raise an Army, no efficient way of raising funding for the government to function, and an overall lack of power. The government had to rely on the states for any control they could exercise and the states often would not help the government. Alexander Hamilton later speaks about the pros to the federal constitution…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation failed to provide the United States with an effective government. It acted as though a loose confederation, or “firm league of friendship.” The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government that linked the thirteen states in common problems such as foreign affairs, and a judicial arm. Although, there was no executive branch, which meant no leader to enforce laws. Also, the Congress was weak (it was designed that way), and therefore the government could merely advocate and appeal. The United States faced two main problems: the lack of the central government’s power, and its inability to collect and/or create revenue.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only was America suffering from the aforementioned problems, but to complicate matters further, it also had to deal with the aftermath of the failed Articles of Confederation. Furthermore, the 13 states were not cooperating together, which made the situation even more difficult. This goes to show the extent to which America was in crisis; even things like their core values, such as working together, were broken. Actions needed to be taken resolve the complications which the American people suffered at the hands of the failed Articles of Confederation, and to unify the states. This action was ratifying the constitution.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays