Many recognize that the Articles of the Confederation were a failure, and yes they did fail but they served when the United Stated readily called desperately for a structure and also they pointed out what we needed to put in the constitution. From 1781-1789 the Articles of the Confederation held the nation together but only with a small non-effective government that was weak, ineffective and non-wealthy. In 1789 a council met to discuss all the changes and the weaknesses of the A.O.C. They discussed that under the A.O.C. congress was too weak because they couldn’t enforce taxation upon states, regulate trade throughout the states, and enforce its laws and decisions upon the states. They also discussed that the A.O.C. didn’t give enough power to the central government; the majority of the power actually went to the states themselves, who actually could individually prevent the A.O.C. from being amended. So because these grievances were all stated the need for a new constitution for the United States arose.
One of the main reasons for the reform of the state of our government i.e. drafting a new constitution was the fact the states held almost all of the power in the union under the Articles of the constitution. States such as Rhode Island rejected taxes and trade restrictions put into place by the national government or congress. Under the A.O.C. congress could create taxes but they had absolutely no power to enforce these taxes if the states rejected them (Document A). Also along with the A.O.C. the government had no power to coin or regulate money. So each state had their own currency so when the government could actually collect taxes from states, they each had their own currency. Some states didn’t accept other’s currency and some was worth much less because much more would be printed off in some states. Because under the Articles of the Confederation, the government had no power to collect taxes or coin money, they couldn’t amass enough money to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document