David Walker and Frederick Douglas’ contrasting approach to the oppressive epoch of the antebellum South compare favorably to that of Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Both men were passionate oppressive on the issue however both had different takes on how the issue should have been addressed and ultimately resolved. David Walker’s approach compares to that of Malcolm X in that both men were extremely passionate in what they believed to be right and just and went about addressing those particular issues in more of a radical, risqué kind of way. Whereas Frederick Douglas’ approach compared to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in that both individuals matched the kind of passion on an issue that Malcolm X and David Walker shared, they just felt a situation no matter how unjust, should be organized and conducted in a more conservative manner. Perhaps the most key difference between both men is that David Walker was an advocate for the use of violence unlike his counterpart Frederick Douglas.
Frederick Douglass' famous anti-slavery speech was conducted on July 5, 1852 which claimed free blacks and slaves were not Americans because Constitutional benefits and protections granted to whites were not given to blacks. It examines his accusations that America had always had double standards and it had never been sincere and true in implementing liberty, equality and justice. The paper continues to back his claim with examples from David Walker's appeal against the apparent injustice of the white man and the writings of Ida B. Wells-Barnett, a militant civil rights fighter. We can clearly see that Douglass' aim was to uncover the injustice and hypocrisy of American liberty and equality, its empty slogans and hollow mockery. By doing this Douglass not only inciting his black fellow men to rebel against such unjust and oppressive system but also uncovering the naked truth to the authority and to the people who are celebrating the Independence Day. Douglass by...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document