Preview

David Humes Thoughts On Empiricism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Humes Thoughts On Empiricism
David Hume’s thoughts on Empiricism
One of the most notable figures in the history of western philosophy was Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was widely known for his views on Empiricism. Empiricism has been pondered since the beginnings of philosophy by many famous figures, from Aristotle to John Locke. (Wikipedia) Empiricism claims that human knowledge is founded on observation and use of the five senses. Hume published a literary work titled Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. This had a profound impact on empiricist philosophy. (Heter)
In section 2 of the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, titled Of the Origin of Ideas, Hume makes distinctions about impressions and ideas. Simply stating how a memory obtained from the central nervous system can never reach the level of raw, vividness that the original impression had made. An example of this concept can be something along the lines of experiencing free fall. We have all experienced free fall at some point in our lives. Simply recalling that moment can never fully allow us to grasp the gut wrenching excitement of pure gravity.
An interesting thought brought forward in section 2 is The Copy Principle. Hume states "But though our thought seems to possess this unbounded liberty, we shall find, upon a nearer examination, that it is really confined within very narrow limits, and that all this creative power of the mind amounts to no more than the faculty of compounding, transposing, augmenting, or diminishing the materials afforded us by the senses and real life experience…"(Enquiry, Section II)
In layman 's terms, imagination of the human mind might be perceived as limitless. However, in reality, it is really a combination of sensory information and real life experiences. To this end, Hume believes that there are no truly original ideas. Everything we can conceive is a "copy" or modification of material afforded to us by our surroundings. Examples of this can be found all around us. Such as the



Cited: Hennighausen, Amelia, and Eric Roston. "14 Smart Inventions Inspired by Nature: Biomimicry: Nature as R&D Lab." Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg, 19 Aug. 2013. Web. 20 Sept. 2013. Heter, T. Storm. "Empiricism." First Philosophy: A Handbook for Beginning Philosophers. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 15-21. Print. Hume, David. "Section II: Of the Origin of Ideas." An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. N.p.: n.p., 1784. N. pag. Print. Wikipedia contributors. "David Hume." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 30 Aug. 2013. Web. 21 Sep. 2013. Wikipedia contributors. "Empiricism." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 15 Sep. 2013. Web. 21 Sep. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume criticised the teleological argument in plenty of ways as he believed that the argument was deeply flawed.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From dates back to the early 1200's to the mid 1650's, Empiricists were all about experiments. Robert Bacon, and Early Empiricist, believed that experience is superior to argument (which could come from long accepted theories), and that experience science is a valid route to truth, making observation key to science. Priestley says in his article, "That this was not the case, I attribute to the force of prejudice, which, unkown to ourselves, biasses not only our judgments, properly so called, but even the perceptions of our senses: for we may take a maxim so strongly for granted, that the plainest evidence of sense will not intirely change, and often hardly modify our persuasions; and the more ingenious a man is, the more effectually he is entangled in his errors; his ingenuity only helping him to deceive himself, by evading the force of truth." He's stating that many people overlook simple observations and facts (or truths) because they believe in theories and biasses. He believes that an ingenious man is deceiving himself by distancing himself from the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume and Berkeley both separated in the middle of reason and sensation. Hume, be that as it may, went encourage, trying to demonstrate that reason and sane judgments are only constant relationship of unmistakable sensations or encounters. ‘’Hume believed that morality was based on feelings of sympathy with other people, and that benevolence towards others tends to promote the interests of our species, and bestow happiness on human society.”(humanism) Hume's contributes to monetary hypothesis, which affected the Scottish scholar and business analyst Adam Smith and later financial specialists, incorporated his conviction that riches depends not on cash but rather on products and his acknowledgment of the impact of social conditions on financial matters. In his moral considering, Hume held that the idea of good and bad is not levelheaded but rather emerges from a respect for one's own particular…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rejecting the principle of induction, the idea that the present will resemble the past, Hume states that “The mind can never possibly find…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion we are introduced to three characters that serve the purpose to debate God and his nature, more specifically, what can mankind infer about God and his nature. The three characters; Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes all engage in a debate concerning this question and they all serve the purpose of supporting their views on the subject. It is the "argument from design" put forth by Cleanthes that is the focal point of the discussion, and it is Demea and Philo who attempt to discredit it.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume then argues that ideas are ‘faint copies’ of impressions. Think what it is like to see…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second of Hume’s points is that the causal principle is doubtful. His evidence for this is that we can conceive of things without a cause therefore things without a cause are possible this is also backed up by Mackie who says that the causal principle has no evidence and only exists in a methodological sense. However this argument also has severe faults that discredit it. If the arguments from causality are questionable then that means that the arguments from conceivability are questionable as well. This could also mean that a logically necessary truth could be conceived as false if you don’t completely understand it. This opens the problem that just because something is logically possible then that doesn’t mean it could happen in the real world. This basically disables Hume’s ideas on non-causal…

    • 437 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was best known as an advocate of empiricism and for his belief of tabula rasa, or the blank slate. In this way his beliefs were similar to those of the behaviorist school of thought. Locke is known as the father of English Empiricism. Empiricism believes that everyone is born with a blank slate that we fill as we experience life. The knowledge that we gain throughout life is due to our experiences, not through reasoning or thought. Locke believed that there is only the capacity to have ideas in the mind, not to be born with them. He states that all knowledge of the world comes from the experience we have within it, through our perceptions and senses. According the empiricism, every thought that we have is influenced by an experience that we have had. Essentially, according to Locke’s view and empiricism, the only way to know the truth about something is to actually experience it through our senses.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays