DNA Profiling Argument Essay

Many people believe that DNA profiling is not a credible source. Although 99.9 percent of human DNA is the same in everyone, the remaining 0.1 percent which consists of about 3 million base pairs of amino acids is unique to that individual (Ballaro and Walter). Without the help of scientists and their technology many criminals would get away with their crimes. Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is a component of every cell in the human body. DNA can be found in any organic source for example saliva, blood, semen, and even hair or skin cells. The use of DNA to settle a crime case, started in 1988 with the conviction of Colin Pitchfork for the rape and murder of two young girls in England (Driscoll and Newton). Although some people that have been innocent charged with crimes the most reliable source is still DNA profiling. The FBI’s DNA profiling program has a goal to standardize methodology among all US laboratories. Forensic sampling is getting new advanced technology to enhance the accuracy of DNA testing (Driscoll and Newton). There is concern that DNA profiling poses a threat to individual privacy rights (Ballaro and Walter). DNA profiling is not harming anyone’s rights it’s protecting the community by putting the correct criminals away. DNA evidence is huge when it comes to jury trials. It gives, what most
The Yorkshire Police department reopened the case in 1999 and matched the DNA profile to Ronald Castree. He Was later convicted and sent to jail for 30 years in 2007 ( Sean Hodgson ). If the process of DNA profiling was not used in this case then Stefan Kiszko would not have been able to prove his innocence and Ronald Castree would have gotten away and committed even more crimes. DNA profiling allows for the victims family to know that the right person is put