Preview

DBQ 4: Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DBQ 4: Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton
Kyle Berry
AP US History
Olsen
Period 3
DBQ 4: Thomas Jefferson and Philosophical Consistency
In 1800, the American people were ready for a change and shift in political power. The nation had the choice between Federalist John Adams or Republican Thomas Jefferson. The election was often referred to as the Revolution of 1800, the year Thomas Jefferson defeated
John Adams to be elected as the nation's new president. Years prior to the Election of 1800,
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton argued over issues of of constitutional interpretation, the policies of the Republicans in the years of their presidency (1801­1817) reflected the same beliefs as the Federalists. Jefferson went against his his convictions that got him elected by
…show more content…
However, with the foreign affairs between the Barbary Pirates, who kept capturing American ships on the Mediterranean and enslaving the crew members. This led Jefferson to dismissing American armed forces around the globe to focus on the Barbary Pirates in North Africa (Document E). Jefferson had gone against his own issue on a smaller military and against congress. Only congress can send Americans out in combat, but on his own, Jefferson ordered warships out to the Mediterranean to battle the
Barbary Pirates. He didn’t inform the congress of his actions and choice until the ships had already sailed halfway. Jefferson first contradicting action he made as a president was when he

went against his views on a smaller military and sent out American warships to the
Mediterranean to battle the Barbary Pirates and rescue American prisoners.
When the National Bank was established in 1791 by Hamilton and Washington, Jefferson had his own views on it whether it should exist or not. Jefferson objected the National Bank because he thought it would interfere with the development of state banks (Document A). Years after his election, he renewed the First Bank of America and created the Second Bank of the
…show more content…
He wanted to purchase the land to expand farms and let each white citizen or family own their own piece of land. The purchase may’ve been a steal at the time, but it was unconstitutional of Jefferson to purchase a great amount of land like that. He spent money that the country didn’t have without permission from the House of Representatives and Congress. The action Jefferson made was as well hypocritical because he done something he argued against Hamilton. The Federalists opposed of this purchase favoring close ties with Britain. Jefferson’s Secretary of State however assured Jefferson that the purchase was within the strictest interpretation of the constitution. He was cutting it very close though when he purchased the land.
The Embargo Act was a general Embargo which made exports illegal in the United states of America that was sponsored by Thomas Jefferson. The Anti­Federalists (Republicans) were

trade partners with France, while the Federalist were trade partners with Britain. As Jefferson and the Republicans won the election, it meant that a majority of the trades would involve
France. However, when the Embargo Act was created, it made trading with other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chesapeake Incident: I read in the Boston Times that the British tried taking crewmen from the Chesapeake. Why isn’t Jefferson doing anything to prevent this? He’s not leading our country properly. We have a navy, they should be able to defend against these attacks!…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The establishment of the First and Second Banks of the US caused great controversy and sectionalism because their constitutionality were questioned by those with a strict construction of the Constitution and supported by those with a loose construction of the Constitution. The First Bank of the US was proposed by Alexander Hamilton, who had a loose construction of the Constitution, as a part of his Financial Plan. Hamilton wanted to solve America’s debt problem, as well as increase the country’s economic stability and credibility. He calculated that the Bank would benefit the economy by helping to facilitate government finances, functioning as a commercial bank, and lending to businesses as a central source of capital. The federal government owned two million dollars of the Bank, giving it considerable control, and the remaining eight million would be owned by private investors. This gave the federal government a large amount of power over the…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson’s differences in social philosophy over the interpretation of the Constitution and the establishment of a national bank…

    • 1350 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton Ideals

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alternatively, Jefferson came from wealth, but was a champion of the poor and a proponent of taxing the wealthy. Another area where the two men differed was in regard to economic policy. As the Secretary of the Treasury in the new government, Hamilton’s policies established a National Bank, provided the U.S. with uniform currency, and worked to establish the financial credit of the new nation. Jefferson opposed the creation of a National Bank because of his belief that that the Constitution did not give federal authority for it. Yet another area of disagreement between the two was the size of the army. Hamilton believed in a strong federal force and true to his beliefs in local and state powers, Jefferson believed that the U.S. did not need a large, national army.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They guaranteed that the Federal government would dependably perform the will of the general population. On the other hand, Jefferson would not bargain and demanded lecturing his old fashioned fear inspired notions. Jefferson even went so far as to say, "Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories." Unfortunately, this troubled rationality did not work extremely well for the American individuals by any stretch of the imagination; it supported the improvement of groups, a clear irreconcilable situation, and no place for trade off. Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. The Democratic Republicans indicated on numerous occasions that they were most adroit at bringing about inward strife as opposed to fathoming anything. Plainly Jefferson's uncompromising and accusatory rationalities just served to separation Americans, open up interstate clashes, and harm the quality of the United…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jefferson didn't agree with the idea of a National Bank because it was not in the Constitution. Hamilton wanted to create the National Bank of the United States. Hamilton said that the government could make a National Bank because it falls under the "necessary and proper" clause. The Clause gave the government the power to pass laws. Hamilton also stated that the writers of the Constitution could not have known that there would be a need for a National Bank.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson wanted to make sure the American people approved of his principles as well. He maintained a conciliatory tone in his address to ensure the people's trust. He maintained this tone by humbling himself before the people by asking for their "guidance and support" in helping him steer the country in the right direction. He also called the nation and leaders to unite in effort to better the country, in spite of differences. Jefferson wanted to reconcile differences and make peace. (3) Jefferson also called all political leaders to remember the "sacred principle" that said, "though the will of the majority would always prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protest, and to violate would be oppression". This means the will of the majority is to prevail as long as the will is reasonable and as long as the minority still has their rights which are protected by the law. (4) Jefferson took a relaxed approach towards those who would wish to dissolve the Union. He took…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jefferson's beliefs in local self government created differences between himself and Alexander Hamilton which created the Federalists (Hamilton followers) and the…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s (president through 1801-09) political party, the Jeffersonian Republicans, believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Jefferson’s opposing party, the Federalists, believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. In order to comprehend the clear distinction between the two parties it is imperative to analyze the events during Thomas Jefferson’s presidency and James Madison’s presidency. The Democratic Republican Party solidified their values in various instances: James Madison’s letter to Congress, the resolutions of the Hartford convention, and Jefferson’s letter regarding religious freedom. Likewise, the Federalist Party upheld to their values when they created a national bank and to an extent when Jefferson criticized the federalist Parties values. However, both parties contradict their values many times. The Democratic Republican Party contradicted their strict approach, when Jefferson imposed the Embargo Act (creating many political cartoons emphasizing the hypocritical Democratic Republicans), the Louisiana Purchase, criticism from own party members, and controversial and contradicting views by Thomas Jefferson. Similarly the Federalist Party contradicts their own party values when they criticized the vague conscription bill of the Democratic Republicans. Even though the Federalist Party followed their loose values to an extent, while the Democratic Republican Party followed their strict values to an extent, both of the parties became hypocritical and contradicted their values for personal party gain.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicanism (1801-1809): The Dominant and rival political party after the decline of Hamilton Federalism. They believed in a limited government, accountability of public officials, dispersal of power, and LIBERTY and EDUCATION for the individual (both more important than security). Their political philosophy was one of nature and nurture. The party feared the urban class, they believed cities were corrupted. They praise the yeoman independent farmer and independent citizen. In fact, Jefferson believed that a “good society” was an agrarian society. Moderate nationalism, narrow localism, but a strict constructionist. Jefferson and his Republican party believe that government only had GRANTED (enumerated) powers, NOT implied powers. They imposed a lassie-faire type of government, “Government is best by which governs the least”. Central Political Statement of the Jeffersonian: “The ENDS of government, NOT the means”. Jefferson idealized the independent family farmer as God’s chosen people. Agriculture was the righteous way of life according to Jefferson. The party believed in a populist form of government, where the majority of the people are involved, not just the elite class. They believed that in order to achieve a true democratic state, the people needed to be EDUCATED, “To be free, you must be educated” – T.J. (Disclaimer: Not all, only white man that own land). They passed the Judiciary Act of 1801 to get rid of Federalists in the Judiciary Branch. According to Hofstadter, Jefferson was more a PRACTICAL man, than an ideal who was influenced by the environment. He was raised in an agricultural environment and developed a fear of the urban class and the cities and also feared of slavery. He believed that farmers were moral incorruptible. Jefferson looked at the Constitution for what government COULD do, as opposed to Hamiltonian Federalism who looked at the Constitution to see what government couldn’t do. However, towards the end of his…

    • 4658 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Bank of the United States was designed to make money and build an economy. It was designed by men like Alexander Hamilton and Robert Morris, but did not benefit the common citizen as much as wealthy investors. Why did a fledgling government need to borrow millions from overseas in order to invest in a “national” bank, to turn around and then borrow the same money back and pay interest on it? The banking system developed by Alexander Hamilton and Robert Morris was prime pickings for speculators, and laid the groundwork for a history of unscrupulous activity regarding our nation’s money supply that continues to this day. The signatures on the Constitution were barely dry before corruption and greed laid their roots in our country’s economic foundation.…

    • 4255 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Jefferson Analysis

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jefferson would have a very successful presidency, purchasing over 800, 000 square miles of Louisiana territory from France for over $15 million dollars, successfully doubling the size of the United States, followed by launching the Lewis and Clark expedition. He cut the National Debt in half and unleashed the U.S. Navy on Pirates. However, there were some failures and bad contributions under his administration. The Embargo Act of 1807 would be one of Jefferson’s worst contributions to the country. During Jefferson’s presidency, France and Britain were at war, the USA tried to stay neutral but couldn’t any longer when France and Britain tried to control the U.S.’s trade and ports on all sides. In a desperate attempt to avert war, the United States imposed an embargo on foreign trade. Jefferson regarded the embargo as an “idealistic experiment--a moral alternative to war”. He believed that economic intimidation would convince Britain and France to respect America’s neutral rights. The embargo was an unpopular and costly failure. It hurt the American economy far more than the British or French, and resulted in widespread smuggling. Exports fell from $108 million in 1807 to just $22 million in 1808, farm prices fell sharply, shippers also suffered, harbors filled with idle ships and nearly 30,000 sailors found themselves jobless. Three days before Jefferson left office, the Embargo Act was…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton saw the new nation as one that needed many new changes. He was an avid Federalist, who helped write the Federalist Papers, in favor of creating the new constitution. Hamilton distrusted the will of the people and thought that man was naturally selfish, so he believed that a strong central government was necessary to keep order. He thought that the states rights needed to succumb to the power of a central government. To “make the United States economically strong and independent of Europe,” the federal government had to solve “its two most pressing financial problems: revenue and credit” (Davidson, p. 221). So as the Secretary of the Treasury, he began his duty to the country by drawing up his Report on the Further Provision Necessary for Establishing Public Credit and a second report soon after that announced his idea to establish a national bank. Hamilton believed that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon his inauguration, Thomas Jefferson was eager to implement many of his Republican views into the government of the United States. Jeffersons presidential service, however, turned out to be fairly contradictory to his original views. Jefferson was forced to alter his views for the good of the nation when presented with difficult situations, and he did not hesitate.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At noon on March 4 of 1801 in the new federal capital of Washington, D.C. Thomas Jefferson gave his First Inaugural Address were he took the oath to become the third president of the United States. His speech marked the first transfer of the presidency from the Federalist Party into the Republican Party. Indeed, he desired to reach out to his political opponents and alleviate the division that was going on between both parties by embracing that ¨we are both Federalist and Republicans¨. In addition, Jefferson wanted to bring the people together under the belief that upholding the constitution as well as the nation could end up proving to be unifying forces. He believed that the country could reflect…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays