Preview

Cultural Relativism Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cultural Relativism Research Paper
Cultural relativism can be defined as the understanding that the choices one can consider morally right are those approved of by one’s culture. Cultural differences in moral beliefs don’t imply cultural relativism because nonmoral beliefs can alter the perspective of basic moral principles shared by the culture. This would imply that there are no universally set/correct moral standards. Saying that cultural differences in moral beliefs imply cultural relativism is only part of an argument, not a conclusion supported by valid premises. There is the possibility that the moral issue in question is, in fact, an objective truth, in which case the culture is purely wrong. If cultural relativism exists, and no culture can ever be wrong in their moral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fluehr-Lobban believes that other cultures should have their own moral values. Fluehr-Lobban's main views on cultural relativism is that other cultures should have their own moral values and that we should respect them and educate ourselves about their culture. Cultural relativism states that moral evaluation is rooted in and cannot be separated from the experience, beliefs, and behaviors of a particular culture, and hence, that what is wrong in one culture may not be so in another.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first ethical belief that the author discusses is Cultural Relativism. It talks about the how diversity is becoming more and more apparent between different cultures worldwide. The author mentions that often customs that are unquestioningly accepted in one part of the world are considered abhorrent in another, for example: human sacrifice. Cultural Relativism claims that there are no absolute standards for moral judgment. Basically says that the values that every culture isn't necessarily wrong, just different. I almost completely disagree with this view. The largest problem I have with it rejects absolute truth and its existence. If one were to make the statement "there is no absolute truth," they would have just proven themselves wrong because that is a self-defeating statement.…

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For example, by following the cultural relativism theory we would not be able to criticise the practice of female circumcision in many countries in Africa, even though it causes long and short term health concerns for female involved. It also shows when believe systems or old traditions tend to shape cultures how illogical, irrational acts could be carried by the name of traditions. Since there is no technique to qualitatively evaluate cultures, all the cultures could claim that they are absolutely right. Furthermore, cultural relativism does not even let us judge or criticise own cultural values, practices, lifestyles, morals and ethics, which halts the process of improving and in a sense change in our own cultures as…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw gives an obvious and unconvincing example. He compares abortion in two different societies; it is absolutely wrong in Catholic Spain, but widely accepted in Japan. Most readers would agree that this occurs and abortion is a topic that the world will most likely never come to agreeing terms with. Therefore, relativism is actually significant in each culture. Cultural relativism is complicated in that a whole group of people within an area believe in what they've always been told. Shaw gives an excellent example about slavery in the south. Decades ago, it unfortunately existed and it was acceptable in that time period. However, now it is clearly immoral. A relativist would think that it is acceptable because it was part of the culture. It is not steady to keep changing morals through time. So, who distinguishes right from wrong in that whole society in the first place?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context. Cultural relativists believe that all cultures are worthy in their own right and are of equal value. Diversity of cultures, even those with conflicting moral beliefs, is not to be considered in terms of right and wrong or good and bad. Some believe that morality is relative to culture, but some believe that argument is invalid. Some also argue that there is such a thing as moral isolationism.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Objective moral truths are truths that exist regardless of an individuals or a group opinion. Subjectivists believe that there are no objective moral truths and that morality is decided by the person. For instance, some objectivists would say that it is an objective moral truth that torturing babies is wrong. While subjectivist believe that it is morally true or morally wrong if one approves or disproves of torturing babies. According to subjectivism, things are either right or wrong according to an individuals attitudes and feelings. Cultural relativism differs from objectivists view on moral truths as it believes also there are no objective moral truths. Cultural relativism believe morality is based on the moral code of a culture. Moral codes…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We all come from different places and are born into different beliefs and do not always agree with one another in what is true and what is not. From television, to Internet and newspapers we get to read what surround us, what is happening in our every day life, but what are we reading and watching is it trustworthy? Can they tell us what is true or false? People disagree about many issues presented to them for example what is said in religion to what science proves and so on. This is where cultural relativism comes in, morally is correct to the beliefs and ethics of a particular culture within that same society. By this theory, no one can go against another society and say that their beliefs are right or wrong; it is up to one’s society where they choose what is correct or wrong. Philosopher James Rachels argues, cannot conclude a disagreement based on opinions on an issue and there could be possible a certainty of truth behind it. Considering this next argument provided by…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural relativism is contradictory when it states that every culture should embrace a policy of tolerance towards other cultures. To begin with, cultural relativism states right and wrong differ from one cultural to another, it does not imply that other cultures have to tolerate that point of view. The fact of the matter is, one culture believes one idea and another may have another idea. These cultures are not going to change their point of view, or remotely agree with the other culture if their views are contradictory. Each culture has its own beliefs, there is no room for tolerance in true cultural relativism.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral schools of thought dictate ethical behavior, however, every culture assigns ethical and moral values differently (Lecture 1). Without a moral or ethical structure, society would not prosper. Clashing cultural values make defining morality complicated. Ethicists argue the minimum conception of morality establishes a starting point based on reason that defines and installs a code of morality or ethics. The minimum conception of morality is an “effort to guide one’s conduct by reason—that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing—while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s action” (Rachels 13).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    + while cultural relativism is "the concept that the importance of a particular cultural idea varies from one society or societal subgroup to another, the view that ethical and moral standards are relative to what a particular society or culture believes to be good/bad, right/wrong." (dictionary.com)…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anthropologist use unique perspectives in order to judge a specific culture, and approach the studies of cultures using Cultural Relativism and Ethnocentrism. The definition of these terms is very different in many ways when describing cultures. Cultural Relativism is defined as the perspective that any aspect of a culture must be viewed and evaluated within the context of that culture. While, ethnocentrism, is defined as making value judgments based on one’s own culture when describing aspects of another culture. Cultural relativism is much more commonly used by anthropologist due to the simple fact maintaining respect and avoiding ignorance to ones culture custom, cultural trait, belief, activities, or any other values and traditions of a culture. As for ethnocentrism, it is the opposite of cultural relativism. Ethnocentrism makes value judgments from their native culture, towards another ones culture in order to judge their elements such as custom, trait, belief, activities and any other value or traditions. This can cause much room for decreasing the values of one’s culture. Judgments like “weird, strange, unethical and backward” are commonly made from using ethnocentrism. In Islam, females are required that they wear proper, decent, modest, and clean clothes and are instructed by Allah in the Quran to wear as a minimum Hijab, or head covering. When an Islamic woman is home however, she may free her beauty in front of immediate family such as her husband, children, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, and other males. An example of cultural relativism perspective would have a statement like such: “Islamic women cover their beauty with a clean, modest Hijab when in public.” This statement takes a step into the culture for the judgment, and that’s why it is Cultural relativism. An example of ethnocentrism would have a statement like such: “Islamic offensive tradition forces women to cover their face in a Hijab in public.”…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is culture? What difference does it make that humans live in societies? How are we to locate distinct cultures in the contemporary world where people and goods constantly (but not freely) move? How such cultures are daily being reproduced, commented upon and criticized, transformed, or newly produced? This course will introduce the field of socio-cultural anthropology through the exploration of some of its central topics, methods and theories. We refuse to see “culture” as a bounded “thing” in a particular place or as a fixed and timeless characteristic of a certain group of people. Instead, we focus on the politics of culture, in which culture is not only transmitted and reproduced but also challenged, evoked, and produced from both within and outside.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays