Commentary on Cultural Diversity
Across the Pacific: The Dominance of
Western Theories, Models, Research
and Practice in Psychology
Consultants Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand [Iwi Affiliations: Te Ati Haunui-a-Paparangi, Nga¯ Puhi, Tuwharetoa]
he three featured articles in the December 2010 section on cultural diversity across the Pacific address important cultural issues in psychology. Berry (2010) applied these issues to intercultural relations and acculturation, Furnham (2010) to culture shock, and Marsella and Yamada (2010) to psychopathology. The common theme among these articles was the Western-centric dominance of psychology’s research, theories, models and practice, in part because of structural discrimination such as ethnocentric curricula, policies and teaching methods within academic institutions. In Aotearoa New Zealand, including matauranga
knowledge) and kaupapa Maori
curricula for clinical psychology has started to address that Western-centric dominance, but more importantly, resulted in more culturally safe and responsive psychological services being provided to Maori
users of those services. The present commentary suggested that including and integrating more ¯
cross-cultural and indigenous knowledge into the tertiary curricula of applied psychology fields, such as clinical, industrial-organisational, and coaching psychology would be one way to counter the Westerncentric dominance.
Keywords: cultural diversity, discrimination, dominance, ethnocentric, indigenous, Maori ¯
One of the common features of countries across the
Pacific is ethnic and cultural diversity. Many of those
countries share a long history of colonisation resulting in deculturation and often poorer socio-economic, health and employment outcomes for indigenous peoples. Many of those negative outcomes persist today, but are no longer limited to indigenous peoples. Increasingly, other minority cultural groups are feeling the impact of living in countries that are often Westerncentric in terms of the predominance (and assumed superiority) of Western systems of government and
power, social structures and standards, economic systems, academic institutions, research methods and topics, and language.
In that context, psychological research and services
have an important role to play; for example, understanding the processes of acculturation, the processes of culture shock, the experience of racism, prejudice and discrimination in society as well as in employment, and the poorer mental health and general wellbeing outcomes for those of
non-Western cultures. However, other disciplines such as
sociology, human development and learning, and sociocultural anthropology (to name a few) also shed important light on these issues.
Until relatively recently, the research, theories, models
and practice in psychology and other disciplines has been
almost exclusively Western-centric; indeed, such Westerncentric psychology continues to dominate in our teaching institutions and therefore our practice. In more recent
years, as researchers and practitioners from indigenous
and minority cultures have come through the ranks and
gained academic qualifications, some of that dominant
space has been claimed back, resulting in research, theories, models and practice from a non-Western world view. Consequently, the limitations of a largely Western psychology (and other disciplines) when working with diverse ethnic and cultural groups is being increasingly recognised
as poorer socio-economic, health and employment outcomes for minority groups, including indigenous peoples, persist.
Address for correspondence: Lisa Stewart, M¯aramatanga Consultants Ltd, PO Box 334-054, Sunnynook, Auckland 0743, New Zealand. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
JOURNAL OF PACIFIC RIM PSYCHOLOGY, Volume 6, Issue 1 pp. 27–31. c The Authors 2012. doi...
References: Berry, J.W. (2010). Intercultural relations and acculturation in
the Pacific region
Follette, W.C., & Houts, A.C. (1996). Models of scientific
progress and the role of theory in taxonomy development:
A case study of the DSM. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 64(6), 1120–1132.
Furnham, A. (2010). Culture shock: Literature review, personal statement and relevance for the South Pacific. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 4(2), 87–94. doi:10.1375/
Gavala, J., & Taitimu, M. (2007). Training and supporting a
Human Rights Commission. (2011). A fair go for all? Structural
discrimination and systemic barriers to ethnic equality.
Johnson, S., & Cooper, C. (2003). The construct validity of the
ASSET stress measure
Kingi, T.K., & Durie, M. (2000). ‘Hua Oranga’: A M¯aori measure
of mental health outcomes
Levy, M. (2002). Barriers and incentives to Maori participation in
the profession of psychology: A report for the New Zealand
Marsella, A.J., & Yamada, A.M. (2010). Culture and psychopathology: Foundations, issues, directions. Journal
JOURNAL OF PACIFIC RIM PSYCHOLOGY
Milne, M. (2005). M¯aori perspectives on kaupapa M¯aori and psychology: A discussion document. Wellington, New Zealand:
New Zealand Psychologists Board.
Ngo, V. H. (2008). A critical examination of acculturation theories. Critical Social Work, 9(1). Retrieved
Nikelly, A.G. (1992). Can DSM-III-R be used in the diagnosis of non-Western patients? International Journal of Mental
Health, 21(1), 3–22.
Nursing Council of New Zealand. (2005). Guidelines for
cultural safety, the Treaty of Waitangi, and Maori health in
Padilla, A. M., & Perez, W. (2003). Acculturation, social identity, and social cognition: A new perspective. Hispanic
Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 25(1), 35–55
Stewart, L. (2011). Developing Mahi Oranga: A culturally responsive measure of M¯aori occupational stress and wellbeing. A
thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements
Thakker, J., & Ward, T. (1998). Culture and classification: The
cross cultural application of the DSM-IV
Torres, K. (2009). ‘Culture shock’: Black students account for
their distinctiveness at an elite college
Triandis, H., & Brislin, R. (1984). Cross cultural psychology.
American Psychologist, 39(9), 1006–1016. doi:10.1037/0003066X.39.9.1006
Williams, S., & Cooper, C
Please join StudyMode to read the full document