C u r r e n t A n t h r o p o l o g y Volume 46, Number 4, August–October 2005 2005 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved 0011-3204/2005/4604-0006$10.00
Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Piraha ˜
Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language by Daniel L. Everett
It does not seem likely . . . that there is any direct relation between the culture of a tribe and the language they speak, except in so far as the form of the language will be moulded by the state of the culture, but not in so far as a certain state of the culture is conditioned by the morphological traits of the language. f r a n s b o a s , 1911 In the early days of American descriptive linguistics, language was seen as an emergent property of human culture and psychology.1 Except for small pockets of researchers here and there, for various reasons both so-called formal and functional linguistics abandoned the investigation of culture-language connections.2 In recent years there has been a welcome revival of interest in the inﬂuence of language on culture and cognition, especially in more sophisticated investigations of the linguistic-relativity/determinism hypothesis (e.g., Lucy 1. I thank the Piraha for their friendship and help for more than ˜ half of my life. Since 1977 the people have taught me about their language and way of understanding the world. I have lived for over six years in Piraha villages and have visited the people every year ˜ since 1977. I speak the language well and can say anything I need to say in it, subject to the kinds of limitations discussed in this paper. I have not published on Piraha culture per se, but I have ˜ observed it closely for all of these years and have discussed most of my observations, including those reported on here, with the Piraha themselves. My wife, Keren, is the only non-Piraha to have ˜ ˜ lived longer among the Piraha than I. She has offered invaluable ˜ help, strong criticism, and inspiration in my studies of the Piraha ˜ language over the years. Peter Gordon’s enthusiasm for studying Piraha counting experimentally has challenged me to consider the ˜ absence of Piraha numerals in a wider cultural and linguistic con˜ text. I thank David Gil of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig for organizing the “Numerals” conference there (March 28 and 29, 2004) and the Institute’s Linguistics Department for offering me ideal circumstances in which to rough out the bulk of this paper. I also thank (in no particular order) Ray Jackendoff, Lila Gleitman, Timothy Feist, Bill Poser, Nigel Vincent, Keren Everett, Arlo Heinrichs, Steve Sheldon, Pattie Epps, Tony Woodbury, Brent Berlin, Tom Headland, Terry Kaufman, Grev Corbett, Peter Gordon, Sally Thomason, Alec Marantz, Donca Steriade, Craige Roberts, Mary Beckman, Peter Culicover, and Iris Berent for comments of varying detail on this paper and Paul Kay for asking challenging questions about my statements on color terms that helped me sharpen my thinking about this enormously. Tom Headland deserves special mention for giving me detailed help on how to make my ethnographic summary more intelligible to anthropologists. This paper supersedes any other published or unpublished statement by me on those aspects of Piraha grammar here ad˜ dressed. No one should draw the conclusion from this paper that the Piraha language is in any way “primitive.” It has the most ˜ complex verbal morphology I am aware of and a strikingly complex prosodic system. The Piraha are some of the brightest, pleasantest, ˜ most fun-loving people that I know. The absence of formal ﬁction, myths, etc., does not mean that they do not or cannot joke or lie, both of which they particularly enjoy doing at my expense, always good-naturedly. Questioning Piraha’s implications for the design ˜ features of human language is not at all equivalent to questioning their intelligence or the richness of their cultural experience...
a u s t i n , p . , a n d j . b r e s n a n . 1996. Non-conﬁgurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:215–68. [scl] b a k e r , m . 2001. The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books. [mt] b a s s o , e l l e n . 1995. The last cannibals: A South American oral history. Austin: University of Texas Press. [mag] b e n e d i c t , r . 1934. Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifﬂin. [scl] b e r l i n , b r e n t . 1991. “The chicken and the egghead revisited: Further evidence for the intellectualist bases of ethnobiological classiﬁcation,” in Man and a half: Essays in Paciﬁc anthropology and ethnobiology in honour of Ralph Bulmer. Edited by A. Pawley, pp. 57–66. Auckland: Polynesian Society. [ap] b e r l i n , b r e n t , a n d p a u l k a y. 1969. Basic color terms, their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University California Press. b ru n e r , j e ro m e , j e n s b ro c k m e i e r , a n d ro m h a r r e . 2001. “Narrative: Problems and promises of an alter´ native paradigm,” in Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self, and culture. Edited by J. Brockmeier and D. Carbaugh, pp. 39–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. b y b e e , j . , r . p e r k i n s , a n d w. p a g l i u c a . 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [mt] c a r n e i r o , r o b e r t l . 1970. “Scale analysis: Evolutionary sequences in the rating of cultures,” in A handbook of method in cultural anthropology. Edited by Raoul Naroll and R. Cohen, pp. 834–71. New York: Columbia University Press. [bb] c a r s t a i r s - m c c a r t h y, a n d r e w. 1999. The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [bb] c h o m s k y, n o a m . 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2004. Address to the Linguistic Society of America, Boston, January. [mt] c h r i s t i a n s e n , m o r t e n h . , a n d s i m o n k i r b y. Editors. 2003. Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [bb] c o m r i e , b e r n a r d . 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1:59–86. [mt] c o r b e t t , g r e v i l l e g . 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. c r a i n , s . , a n d d . l i l l o - m a r t i n . 1999. An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. [mt] d a v i d s o n , d o n a l d . 2001 (1997). “The emergence of thought,” in Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Edited by Donald Davidson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. d e s a l l e s , j e a n - l o u i s . 2004. About the adaptiveness of syntactic recursion. http://www.interdisciplines.org/coevolution/papers/3/5/1. [bb] d e s c o l a , p h i l i p p e . 1994. In the society of nature: A native ecology in Amazonia. Translated by N. Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [as] d e v a l o i s r . , h . c . m o r g a n , m . c . p o l s o n , w. r . m e a d , a n d e . m . h u l l . 1974. Psychophysical studies of
e v e r e t t Cultural Constraints on Piraha Grammar F 645 ˜
monkey vision. 1. Macaque luminosity and color vision tests. Vision Research 14:53–67. [pk] d i e s s e l , h . 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [mt] d i x o n , r . m . w. 1995. “Complement clauses and complementation strategies,” in Grammar and meaning. Edited by F. Palmer, pp. 175–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [scl] ———. 2002 Australian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [scl] e n f i e l d , n i c k . Editor. 2002. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. e v e r e t t , d a n i e l l . 1979. Aspectos da fonologia do Piraha. ˜ M.A. thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. ———. 1983. A lingua piraha e a teoria da sintaxe. Sc.D. diss., ˜ Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. ———. 1985. “Syllable weight, sloppy phonemes, and channels in Piraha discourse,” in Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguis˜ tics Society 11. Edited by Mary Niepokuj et al., pp. 408–16. ———. 1986. “Piraha,” in Handbook of Amazonian languages, ˜ vol. 1. Edited by D. Derbyshire and G. Pullum, pp. 200–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ———. 1987. Piraha clitic doubling. Natural Language and Lin˜ guistic Theory 5:245–76. ———. 1988. On metrical constituent structure in Piraha pho˜ nology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6:20–46. ———. 1992. A lingua piraha e a teoria da sintaxe. Campinas: ˜ Editora da UNICAMP. ———. 1993. Sapir, Reichenbach, and the syntax of tense in Piraha. Journal of Pragmatics and Cognition 1:89–124. ˜ ———. 2004. “Coherent ﬁeldwork,” in Linguistics today. Edited by P. van Sterkenberg, pp. 141–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ———. n.d. Periphrastic pronouns in Wari’. International Journal of American Linguistics. In press. e v e r e t t , d a n i e l l . , a n d k e r e n e v e r e t t . 1984. On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry 15:5–11. e v e r e t t , d a n i e l l . , a n d b a r b a r a k e r n . 1997. Wari’: The Pacaas-Novos language of western Brazil. London: Routledge. [bb] f o d o r , j . 2003. Evaluating models of parameter setting. MS. [mt] f o l e y, w i l l i a m a . 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [bb] g e e r t z , c . 1960. The religion of Java. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [scl] g e n t n e r , d e d r e , a n d s u s a n g o l d i n - m e a d o w. Editors. 2003. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge: MIT Press. g i v o n , t a l m y. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: ´ Academic Press. [bb] ———. Editor. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. g o d d a r d , c l i f f , a n d a n n a w i e r z b i c k a . Editors. 2002. Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical ﬁndings. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [aw] g o o d y, j . 1993. The culture of ﬂowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [scl] g o n c a l v e s , m a r c o a n t o n i o t e i x e i r a . 1990. Nomes e ¸ ˆ cosmos: Onomastica entre os Mura-Piraha. Rio de Janeiro: ´ ˜ UFRJ/Museu Nacional. ———. 2001. O mundo inacabado: Acao e criacao em uma cos¸˜ ¸˜ mologia amazonica. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ. ˆ g o r d o n , p e t e r . 2004. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306 (5695):496–99. g o w, p e t e r . 1991. Of mixed blood: Kinship and history in Peruvian Amazonia. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [mag] g r a c e , g e o r g e w. 1987. The linguistic construction of reality. London, New York, and Sydney: Croom Helm. [ap] g u m p e r z , j o h n l . , a n d s t e p h e n l e v i n s o n . Editors. 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
h a l e , k . l . 1976. “The adjoined relative clause in Australia,” in Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Edited by R. M. W. Dixon, pp. 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. [scl] h a l l p i k e , c h r i s t o p h e r . 1979. The foundations of primitive thought. Oxford: Clarendon. [aw] h a u s e r , m . d . , n . c h o m s k y, a n d w. t . f i t c h . 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–79. [mt] h a y s , d a v i d g . 2000. The measurement of cultural evolution in the non-literate world: Homage to Raoul Naroll. New York: Metagram Press CD. [bb] h a y s , t e r e n c e , 1991. “Interest, use, and interest in uses in folk biology,” in Man and a half: Essays in paciﬁc anthropology and ethnobiology in honour of Ralph Bulmer. Edited by A. Pawley, pp. 109–14. Auckland: Polynesian Society. [ap] h o c k e t t , c . f . 1958. A course in general linguistics. New York: Macmillan. [ap] ———. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientiﬁc American 203:88–96. h o p p e r , p . j . , a n d e . c . t r a u g o t t . 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [mt] h o r n s t e i n , n o r b e r t . 1990. As time goes by: Tense and universal grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press. h u r f o r d , j a m e s , m i c h a e l s t u d d e r t - k e n n e d y, a n d c h r i s k n i g h t . Editors. 1998. Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. h y m e s , d e l l . 1971. “Foreword,” in The origin and evolution of language, by Morris Swadesh. Chicago and New York: Aldine Atherton. i n g o l d , t i m . 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling, and skill. London and New York: Routledge. [as] j a c k e n d o f f , r . 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. [mt] k a l m a r , i v a n . 1985. “Are there really no primitive lan´ guages?” in Literacy, language, and learning. Edited by David Olson, Nancy Torrance, and Angela Hildyard, pp. 148–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [bb] k a y, p a u l . 1972. “Language evolution and speech style,” in Sociocultural dimensions of language use. Edited by Ben Blount and Mary Sanches. New York: Academic Press. [bb] k a y, p a u l , b r e n t b e r l i n , l u i s a m a f f i , a n d w i l l i a m m e r r i ﬁ e l d . n.d. World color survery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. k a y, p a u l , a n d l u i s a m a f ﬁ . 1999. Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist 101:743–60. [pk, scl] k n i g h t , c h r i s , m i c h a e l s t u d d e r t - k e n n e d y, a n d j a m e s h u r f o r d . Editors. 2000. The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [bb] k o p t j e v s k a j a - t a m m , m a s h a . 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge. k r i f k a , m a n f r e d , f r a n c i s j e f f ry p e l l e t i e r , g r e g o ry c a r l s o n , a l i c e t e r m e u l e n , g e n n a ro c h i e r c h i a , a n d g o d e h a r d l i n k . 1995. “Genericity: Introduction,” in The generic book. Edited by Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. l a d e f o g e d , p e t e r . 2005. Vowels and consonants. Oxford: Blackwell. l a g r o u . e l s . 1998. Cashinahua cosmovision: A perspectival approach to identity and alterity. Ph.D. diss., University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, U.K. [mag] l e v i n s o n , s . 2000. Yelı dnye and the theory of basic color ´ ˆ terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1):1–53. [pk, scl] ———. 2003a. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [scl] ———. “Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight!” in Language in mind. Edited by D. Gentner and S. GoldenMeadow. Cambridge: MIT Press. [scl]
646 F c u r r e n t a n t h ro p o l o g y Volume 46, Number 4, August–October 2005
l e v i - s t r a u s s , c l a u d e . 1964. Mythologiques 1: Le cru e le ´ cuit. Paris: Plon. [mag] l e v y - b r u h l , l u c i e n . 1926. How natives think. New York: ´ Humanities Press. [bb] l u c y, j o h n . 1992a. Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1992b. Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. l y o n s , j o h n a . 1995. “Colour in language,” in Colour: Art and science. Edited by T. Lamb and J. Bourriau, pp. 194–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [pk] m c w h o r t e r , j . h . 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5:125–66. [scl] majid. a., m. bowerman, s. kita, d. haun, and s. l e v i n s o n . 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3):108–14. [scl] m a r s h , r . 1956. Comparative sociology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. [bb] m i t h u n , m a r i a n n e . 1984. How to avoid subordination. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10:493–523. [bb] m o l l o n , j o h n d . 1989. “Tho’ she kneel’d in that place where they grew”: The uses and origins of primate colour vision. Journal of Experimental Biology 146:21–38. [pk] m u r d o c k , g e o r g e p e t e r , a n d c . p r o v o s t . 1973. Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology 8:329–92. [bb] n a r o l l , r a o u l . 1956. A preliminary index of social development. American Anthropologist 58:687–715. [bb] n e w m e y e r , f r e d e r i c k j . 2002. “Uniformitarian assumptions and language evolution research,” in The transition to language. Edited by Alison Wray, pp. 359–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2004. Cognitive and functional factors in the evolution of grammar: Interdisciplines. http://www.interdisciplines.org/coevolution/papers/3/5/1. [bb] n i m u e n d a j u , c u r t . 1925. As tribus do alto Madeira. Jour´ nal de la Societe des Americanistes 17:137–72. ´ ´ ´ ———. 1948. “The Mura and Piraha,” in Handbook of South ˜ American Indians. Edited by J. Steward, pp. 255–69. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of American Ethnology. o a k d a l e , s u z a n n e . 2002. Creating a continuity between self and other: First-person narration in an Amazonian ritual context. Ethos 30:158–75. [mag] o ’ g r a d y, w. 1997. Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [mt] o l i v e i r a , a d e l i a e n g r a c i a d e . 1978. A terminologia de parentesco Mura-Piraha. Boletim do MPEG, Serie Antropologia ˜ 66. o l i v e i r a , a d e l i a e n g r a c i a d e , a n d i v e l i s e ro d r i g u e s . 1977. Alguns aspects da ergologia Mura-Piraha. ˜ Boletim do MPEG, Serie Antropologia 65. o v e r i n g , j o a n n a . 1996. Elogio do cotidiano: A conﬁanca e ¸ a arte da vida social em uma comunidade amazonica. Mana ˆ 5(1):81–107. [mag] p a w l e y, a n d r e w. 1986. “Lexicalization,” in Georgetown University round table in languages and linguistics 1985: Languages and linguistics: the interdependence of theory, data, and application. Edited by D. Tannen and J. Alatis, pp. 98–120. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. [ap] ———. 1987. “Encoding events in Kalam and English: Different logics for reporting experience,” in Coherence and grounding in discourse. Edited by R. Tomlin, pp. 329–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. p e r k i n s , r e v e r e d . 1992. Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [bb] p i n k e r , s . 1994. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow Press. [mt]
p y e r s , j . n.d. “Language liberating the mind: The acquisition of false-belief understanding in learners of an emerging sign language,” in Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction. Edited by N. Enﬁeld and S. Levinson. Oxford: Berg. [scl] q u i n e , w i l l a r d v a n o r m a n . 1960. Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press. regan, b. c., c. julliot, b. simmen, f. vienot, p. c h a r l e s - d o m i n i q u e , a n d j . d . m o l l e n . 2001. Fruits, foliage, and the evolution of color vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 356:229–83. [pk] r o p p a , s a v i a n o . 1978. Os Mura-Piraha. Arquivo Instituto ˜ Anatomia e Antropologia do Instituto de Antropologia Souza Marques 3:411–33. s a n d e l l , j . h . , c . g . g ro s s , a n d m . h . b o r n s t e i n . 1979. Color categories in macaques. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 93:626–35. [pk] s a s s e , h - j . 1992. “Theory of language death,” in Language death. Edited by Mathias Brenzinger, pp. 7–30. Berlin: Mouton. [scl] s a u n d e r s , b . a . c . a n d l . v a n b r a k e l . 1997. Are there nontrivial constraints on colour categorization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20:167–228. [scl] s e e g e r , a n t h o n y. 1981. Nature and society in Central Brazil: The Suya Indians of Mato Grosso. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [mag] s u r r a l l e s , a l e x a n d r e . 2003. Face to face: Meaning, feel´ ing, and perception in Amazonian welcoming ceremonies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, n.s., 9:775–91. [as] s w a d e s h , m o r r i s . 1971. The origin and diversiﬁcation of language. Chicago and New York: Aldine Atherton. [bb] t o m a s e l l o , m . 2003. Constructing a language: A usagebased theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [mt] t r a u g o t t , e . , a n d b . h e i n e . 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [mt] t r u d g i l l , p . 2004. Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology 8:305–20. [scl] u r b a n , g r e g . 1989. “The ‘I’ of discourse in Shokleng,” in Semiotics, self, and society. Edited by B. Lee and G. Urban, pp. 27–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [mag] v a n v a l i n , r o b e r t , j r . , a n d r a n d y l a p o l l a . 1997. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. v i v e i r o s d e c a s t r o , e d u a r d o . 1986. Arawete: Os ´ deuses canibais. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor. [mag] ———. 1992. From the enemy’s point of view: Humanity and divinity in an Amazonian society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [mag] ———. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, n.s., 4:469–88. [as] w i e r z b i c k a , a n n a . 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [aw] ———. n.d. “The semantics of colour: A new paradigm,” in Progress in colour studies. Edited by Carole Biggam and Christian Kay. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [aw] w i t k o w s k i , s t a n l e y r , a n d h a r o l d w. b u r r i s . 1981. Societal complexity and lexical growth. Behavior Science Research 1 & 2:143–59. [ap] w r a y, a l l i s o n . Editor. 2002. The transition to language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [bb] w r a y, a l l i s o n , a n d g e o r g e w. g r a c e . n.d. The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural inﬂuences on linguistic form. MS. [bb] w u n d e r l i c h , d . 2004. Why assume UG? Studies in Language 28:642–45.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document