Preview

Cultural Considerations in Moral and Ethical Reasoning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cultural Considerations in Moral and Ethical Reasoning
Cultural considerations in moral and ethical reasoning The sound development of moral reasoning and ethics is an integral part of the growth and maturation of a healthy and productive human being. Without morals and ethics, a person cannot exist within society’s boundaries and would be doomed to be forever barred from its hallowed walls for as long as that person did not conform to the societal norms of having the ability to morally reason and implement a set of ethics. But morals and ethics, as necessary as they are, are relative and not absolute (Brink, 1989). This means that what a particular society constitutes as moral behavior is actually very much like beauty and in the eye of the beholder. The society in which an individual grows up in and is a member of dictates the type of societal rules that must be accepted as part of the price of membership. However, it does not take into account the various cultural differences that must affect which ethics and morals are adhered to in a particular place. Ethics are generally defined as the principles of morally acceptable conduct of individuals, and a person’s belief about right and wrong behaviors (Cosmides & Tooby, 2004). It is evident however, that the difference in cultures around the world make it quite clear that moral reasoning and ethics are directly influenced by the cultures in which they are developed (Boyd & Richerson, 2005). Behavior that is unacceptable in the U.S. is perfectly acceptable elsewhere in the world. For example, polygamy is accepted in most African societies, and even encouraged, but in the U.S. it is not only considered morally reprehensible, but also criminal. Homosexuality is accepted and even celebrated in the U.S. yet woe betides the person trying to engage in this behavior in the Middle East, where it is considered a moral abomination (Haidt & Hersh, 2001). It is clear that there is no universal standard for moral reasoning not with culture, religion, and


References: Boyd R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press. Brink, D. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Knowing thyself: The evolutionary psychology of moral reasoning and moral sentiments. Unpublished manuscript. Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds), Handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 62-68). Oxford: Blackwell. Haidt, J., &Joseph, C. (2004). Sexual morality: The cultures and reasons of liberals and conservatives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31 191-221. Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: Why we are the way we are. New York: Pantheon.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics are the product of a society’s culture so it is natural there will be different responses to similar ethical scenarios. Beekum, Stedam, and Yamamura (2003) suggest these differing conclusions will lead to conflict where one side perceives the outcome is ethical whereas the other does not. Another possible outcome is that one side may not even see a decision even being morally significant. Global organizations have the additional challenge when operating within a multi-national environment of recognizing cultural differences while maintaining a core moral and ethical foundation.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many health care organizations are now calling for multicultural competent health care professionals. It is suggested cultural competence is as an ethical obligation and cross -cultural skills should be placed on a level of parity with other specialized skills (2009). Within each culture exists an incredible diversity of groups and subgroups (2011). Achieving a base of knowledge for each group creates a challenge.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fact that we see diversity between the morals of cultures is a clear indication that moral absolutes do not exist…

    • 628 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our society there is a lot of tension revolving around concepts of morality. Constantly people are debating all over the world whether or not concepts like abortion, homosexuality, gambling, affairs, divorce, contraception, and premarital sex are morally acceptable or morally unacceptable. Right now there are even entire societies that believe the American way of life is morally unacceptable. In Moral Disagreement by Kwame Anthony Appiah, Appiah writes about differing values and morals around the world and within our society. He points out, “we aren’t the only people who have the concepts of right and wrong, good and bad; every society, it seems, has terms that correspond to these thin concepts” (658). However, these concepts…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Bednarz, S. W, Miyares, I. M., Schug, M. C., & White, C. S. (2006), World Cultures and…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many who believe in moral skepticism claim that moral knowledge is impossible, and can only be learned through social indoctrination. In this essay, I will set out a systematic view on contradicting a moral skeptic through evaluating the experiments of Blooms child development theory, Zimbardo Prison Experiment as well as Giacomo Rizzolatti Mirror Neurons theory and Frans De Waal on Animal origins in morality. I for one, most certainly believe that moral skepticism theory is undoubtedly wrong. There is a difference between moral rationalization and instinctive moral beliefs and actions which we learn as children. This moral rationalization is not in the form of social indoctrination.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Five Moral Spheres

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Culture has provided the multiple views of morality that adapts to the understandings of its beholder. The views can differ from the man at war’s beliefs on killing to the young boy being peer pressured to do activities not suitable for his age. Morality offers insight into the activities that are deemed acceptable by one’s judgment and the ones that are not. When a task that was not considered acceptable is committed, guilt tends to creep in and give reasoning to repent for the actions. Yet many would rather justify their actions and change their morals to satisfy their wants and needs.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morals and values vary greatly from person to person. I do agree with Lenn Goodman that some things are just simply wrong but that doesn’t mean that the other side of the world will agree. (Goodman, 2010) Unfortunately, morals are simply personal opinions instead of worldly standards. No matter what a person on one side of the world feels as wrong, there is always a counterpart to that opinion somewhere else.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Bowles and Gintis (2013), the principle of morality has evolutionary roots. These theorists see moral feelings and behaviors as the result of a sort of natural selection. The authors claim that the reason humans are moral beings can be traced to their ancestral environments that were both naturally and socially constructed. In these environments, groups of individuals who were predisposed to cooperate and uphold ethical norms tended to survive and expand relative to those who did not. This cooperative behavior allowed prosocial motivations to proliferate over time, and to slowly establish certain values in society, many of which are still held today. They argue that individuals are moral because they have evolutionarily engrained desires…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Moral Instinct

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A journalist of The New York Times Magazine by the name of Steven Pinker published an article titled, “The Moral Instinct.” The purpose of the article was to discuss morality and the questions and speculations around it. In the article, Pinker suggests that our moral goodness is just in our minds and is there to help us decide between what is right and wrong. He says that our moral goodness isn’t just an opinion-based conclusion, whether we favor or disfavor something. To Pinker, morality makes us feel like we have a purpose to live, and that that purpose solely comes from our loved ones. Pinker goes on to talk more about morality and poses many claims; claims that I have found very interesting. In further study of this article, particularly the claims Pinker brought up, I found some interesting texts that extend and complicate Pinker’s arguments as well as stimulate my thoughts about morality.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directed Study

    • 6560 Words
    • 27 Pages

    My opinion is that what is morally correct in my culture may not be in another culture. If we practice equality then is it right for us to tell another culture what is morally correct. How then do we enforce our morals on others? With the numerous cultures and beliefs how do we determine what a universal standard is? And if a standard is found, how do you enforce it and what would the consequence be for breaking it. There are just too many uncertainties.…

    • 6560 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality in the real world consists not of reasonable ethics but of customs and conventions, inferred understandings about what conduct will and will not be accepted (Hocutt, 2010). Therefore, morality is taught through being rewarded for complying with rules and punished when we fail to follow the rules; essentially these are methods that teach us to feel good when we do the right thing and guilty when we do not (Hocutt, 2010). Through critical reflection, our concepts of civility, fairness, justice, and community are developed internally (Williams & Arrigo, 2012). For this reason, ethics can be taught because it involves critical thinking. The motivation behind our personal choice to behave ethically is rooted in thinking and reasoning rather than in affect or even emotion (Williams & Arrigo, 2012). Like with most things, we make decisions based on…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The moral guide that American society should use for making moral decisions is moral absolutism. This means that I agree that certain moral ideas should be universally accepted.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral reasoning

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When we are faced with moral questions in daily life, just as when we are faced with child-rearing questions, sometimes we act impulsively or instinctively and sometimes we pause to reason about what we ought to do. Much of our reasoning comes about through are position on an issue and how are principle effects that issue. Reasoning, so understood is an intrinsically normative concept. An important implication of this is that any empirical data that shows that we consistently think in a given odd way about morality can be taken in one or two contrasting lights: it can be taken to show that, since 'this is what we do ' this is how our moral reasoning is. Alternatively, it can be taken to show that, in the relevant range of cases, we fail to think responsibly, and hence fail to engage in moral reasoning. And empirical data does not settle this kind of normative question for us.…

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays