Preview

Cruel And Unusual Jeffrey Toobin Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cruel And Unusual Jeffrey Toobin Summary
Jeffrey Toobin graduated from Harvard University in 1986. A few years after his graduation he had been given an opportunity to work with The New Yorker magazine. The New Yorker magazine is a notable magazine it has been around since 1925. Jeffrey Toobin is still employed with The New Yorker and with CNN since 2002. In the December 23rd & 30th, 2013 issue of The New Yorker magazine he wrote an article called “Cruel and Unusual.” Jeffrey Toobin begins to build his credibility by giving specific dates and by stating facts because Jeffrey Toobin has experience in the criminal justice system because he was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in New York. During the time when Toobin was an Assistant U.S. Attorney the death penalty in New York was legal …show more content…
Toobin’s purpose for listing those chemicals was to exacerbate the extent the United States goes to kill prisoners who are on death row. Also the purpose for the writing the third, fourth, and fifth paragraph was to make the reader understand the cruelty of the prisoners because in those paragraphs he establishes the points that other countries block pharmaceuticals form producing those drugs and that states in the United States are now not using the death penalty but moving to life in prison. This is how Toobin appeals to the logos part of the rhetorical triangle. Moreover, Toobin was able to convey emotions in his article. In paragraph three he talks about how the drugs kill the prisoners. For example, the three drug cocktail cause cardiac arrest. In another instance, he appeals to emotion by stating how prisoners are executed such as electrocution, firing squad, and drugs. He also appeals to the emotions of disgust and sadness. He illustrates this by stating how the United States researches effective way to kill it’s prisoners who are on death row. Which makes the reader wonder, why do they want to kill people? Jeffrey Toobin was effectively to appeal to the pathos part of the rhetorical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In her recent book White Rage, Carol Anderson explores various time periods of progress made and how subsequently they each were met with by the history of white supremacist reaction, or white rage, to the African American fight for justice. Since the passing of the Thirteenth amendment to the Civil Rights movement to the election of President Barack Obama, white rage has fueled deliberate roll back to these achievements of African Americans.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jeffrey Toobin is an American lawyer who is a graduate from Harvard University. Toobin is employed with The New Yorker and CNN. As a writer at The New Yorker magazine Toobin published his article “Cruel and Unusual in the December 23rd & 30th, 2013 issue. In this article Jeffrey Toobin justifies his opinion on the death penalty.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 10th York had a Fighting Wrongful Convictions: Journalists Police the Justice System panel hosted by the Journalism Department. The main point of the panel was to talk about how a journalist should properly go about writing a story on wrongful convictions and to help illustrate the point they brought in Johnny Hincapie. Hincapie was an 18 year old who was wrongfully charged with helping in the murder of Brian Watkins in the 1990s. Now at 42 years old, and after serving 25 years in prison his case has been dismissed and he is being tried fairly all thanks to the hard work, and dedication of journalist and York professor Bill Hughes who published an article in City Limits Magazine in 2010 addressing Hincapie’s wrongful conviction. At the panel they had Bill Hughes, Johnny Hincapie, Robert Dennison (the former Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole), Pete…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You have just received a letter in regards to a family member, who you’ve known as kind, caring, funny, and has even helped you out in times of need. The state wishes to enforce capital punishment on him, however, capital punishment is on the ballot this November… What will be your vote? Most people can be persuaded when it comes to sales, dinner, and even forgiveness, but usually when it comes to an involvement of life and death, people know where they stand. Most choose life. When it comes to the death penalty, it can be very challenging to persuade your audience to support it. Edward I Koch, writer, attorney, and Mayor of New York City, takes on this challenge in an article Death and Justice in the New Republic, 1985. Discussing both point of views of the argument, Koch explains to his readers the pros and cons towards capital punishment, and explicitly showing why capital punishment serves purpose. Koch uses an academic, and a highly skilled route of persuading his audience through ethos, logos, and pathos to accept the justification that capital punishment should be supported.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The main argument in this article is that the Supreme Court has failed in their duties to regulate the death penalty. This purported failure is attributed to the Supreme Court not following their own terms and their high-profile involvement in overseeing state and federal death penalty practices (Steiker & Steiker, 1998). The authors argue that the Court’s high profile involvement is in fact creating a “False but powerful impression that the death penalty practices have, in fact, been meaningfully transformed” (Steiker & Steiker, 1998, para. 4).…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Federal Government Plans To Seize Nebraska’s Illegal Execution Drug Shipment When It Arrives In The U.S.”, author Chris McDaniel writes about a letter from the FDA explaining that Nebraska next shipment of execution drugs would be illegal. As well, the repeal of the death penalty that happened in the Nebraska legislature. The death penalty is a dividing issue in the United States because the ongoing debate over its constitutionality. In this debate over its constitutionality, I side against the death penalty. I am against the death penalty because if exonerating evidence surfaces after a prisoner is executed there is no way to fix it. Also, I question the appropriate method for execution with the issue of cruel and unusual…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This particular case is very interesting because it pushes the Supreme Court to address several questions about the American legal system, and where the line is drawn when punishing juvenile offenders. It questions whether a juvenile convicted of murder violates the Constitutional rights that prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, and it questions that violation when imposed on a juvenile "as a result of a mandatory sentencing scheme…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has generated a considerable amount of debate and controversy surrounding the question: what is considered “cruel and unusual punishment.” The important issue that develops from this amendment is whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. Over the decades, the Supreme Court fails to completely confront the issue by refusing to address any issue that falls outside of the case in question. As a result, today’s court is left with many specific instances where the death penalty is acceptable or unconstitutional, but not an overall principle that the death penalty is consistent or inconsistent with the Constitution. In Roper v. Simmons, seventeen year-old Christopher Simmons is tried as an adult…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty is an archaic procedure which operates on a rampant racial bias. Its use is not only tremendously expensive but also ineffective in complying to its purpose : deterring crime and controlling criminal behavior. The courts have struggled to define “ cruel and unusual,” because the term is ultimately vague and the definitions applied to terms like cruel and unusual change over time. Customs also change over time as societies viewpoints and ideologies adapt to into the future. An example of changes in the definition about the 8th amendment is seen in the landmark case of Weems vs United States (1910), where Weems was imprisoned for falsifying a public and official document and as a result was sentenced to 15 years. On top of his…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Into The Abyss

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    The 2011 documentary “Into the Abyss” presents deeper examinations of capital punishment, or in other words state execution, through the sentences of Jason Aaron Burkett and Michael James Perry. These two teens allied in the same act of murder, but received two different verdicts: Burkett was given life in prison, and Perry was sent to the gurney. Author of the film, Werner Hezog, focuses on that triple homicide of 2001, where Texan residents Sandra Stotler, Adam Stotler, and Jeremy Richardson were shot to death and left discarded in the woods. As it reflects on the thoughts of the victims’ families, acquaintances of the convicted, and the guilty themselves, “Into the Abyss” leads to ask the question that has divided civil society with its…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimring, F.E. (2004). The contradictions of American capital punishment (pp. 89-118). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Liptak, Adam. "Supreme Court to Rule on Executing Young Killers." The New York Times 4 Jan. 2005: 54-55. Print.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sdfdsfd

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ernest Van Den Haag, PhD, late Professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University, in an Oct. 17, 1983 New York TimesOp-Ed article titled "For the Death Penalty," wrote the following:…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Washington, DC: Urban Institute New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission (2007). New Jersey Death Penalty…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays