Preview

Crosses Are Not A Violation Of The Establishment Clause

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
87 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crosses Are Not A Violation Of The Establishment Clause
Crosses and other symbols on public buildings are not a violation of the Establishment Clause as they are not a church, but mere symbols of a belief. The founding fathers did not want the government to establish a church like other countries had. If the government declared you will worship this God or that God then you could say it is a violation but having a cross on a graveyard or Moses on the Supreme court building are isn't establishing a church, it is acknowledging a
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    We Need More Prayer In Public Schools: Article Analysis
    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We Need More Prayer In Public Schools: Article Analysis

    The “Establishment Clause” is a limitation within the United States Constitution preventing the Government from passing legislation respecting, promoting, or otherwise supporting an establishment of religion. The clause has been at the heart of many court cases that have gone through the United States Judiciary. From the first case of Bradfield v. Roberts in 1899 to the most recent case of Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe in 2000. Although some cases dealt with appropriations, many cases brought before the courts dealt with the introduction of religion and religious activities within government institutions, especially in public schools. Should local, state, or the federal government support, establish, participate in, or otherwise…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Case: Lemon T. Al. V. Kurtzman 403 US
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Case: Lemon T. Al. V. Kurtzman 403 US

    BRENNAN: argued that the danger was that religion would infiltrate the government and the government would push secularization onto religious creeds. An analysis of the statutes in question shows that they impermissible involve the government in “essentially religious activities,” which the Establishment Clause is meant to…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    APUSA Case Study
    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    APUSA Case Study

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The Establishment clause for the First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”,…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Flag Salute Cases in School Law
    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Flag Salute Cases in School Law

    Is the enforcement of the pledge to the flag unconstitutional? In the case Minersville School District v. Gobitis of 1940, the court upheld a Pennsylvania state law requiring all students to say the pledge to the flag. The case was brought to court because it was common practice to expel students from school that were not complying with the law. The children at the heart of the case were ten and twelve years old, and had been kicked out of school. They were refusing to pledge because it conflicted with their Jehovah’s Witnesses beliefs.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Went Wrong: an Examination of Separation of Church and State
    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What Went Wrong: an Examination of Separation of Church and State

    By the middle of the 20th Century, the United States had emerged as a world…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Unconstitutional?
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Unconstitutional?

    The city of Boerne v. Flores case was ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court in the basis that the religious freedom restoration act (RFRA) surpass the powers of the congress on June 25, 1997. The religious freedom restoration act (RFRA) had been enacted in 1993. The claims appraised in the case could not be applied in the states although they were constitutional in regard to the federal actions. The case started in 1993 after archbishop of San Antonio was denied the permit to expand the local Catholic Church at Texas.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Under God in the Pledge
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under God in the Pledge

    The establishment clause is interesting to me, personally, because I feel that the clause is as vague as it is precise. The establishment clause states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”, however by not respecting an establishment of religion, you can in turn be respecting an establishment of another religion. In the case Newdow vs. US Congress, The Ninth Court revealed that the sole purpose of inserting ‘under god’ was to advance religion, to differentiate the US from other nations under Communist, or godless, rule. Religion is defined as “a collection of belief systems, cultural systems, and world views…”; to believe in no God most certainly falls under the category of religion, therefore both removing and keeping the ‘Under God’ portion of the Pledge either respects the belief systems of both those who believe in a God, and those who do not. This religious power struggle is the source of our conflict.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana Vs Agnostico
    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Louisiana Vs Agnostico

    However, we cannot ignore that many government practices have been surrounded around religious aspects. For instance, The U.S currency contain the phrase “In God We Trust” and the Pledge of Allegiance mentions, “One Nation under God”. These messages are apart of our history which goes back many decades. To say we must keep Church and State separate has been a contradiction by our government. The government cannot say religious messages and displays are unconstitutional in public facilities because these are the same messages that they have promoted and instilled in the people. A State can have certain things pertaining to religion as long it’s not favoring a religion. Which means in this case the religious monument can stay in the part as long as it is not discriminating against religions. The monument in the public park does not endorse a certain religion, the Eagles did not add any commentary it’s just the Ten Commandment text. The Commandments are also embraces by our government because it can serve as moral laws on what you shouldn’t do such as commit murder. Using the Lemon test from the Lemon vs Kurtzman case, the supreme court used three factors in deciding on the case which were secular purpose, primary effect, and entanglement. The monument can be seen by some as being secular because mentioning a religion in particular. The primary effect is that the monument…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between The First Amendment And Establishment Clause
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Between The First Amendment And Establishment Clause

    In the First Amendment, there are two clauses that can be applied to religion. The two clauses are the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the establishment of a religion by Congress. Essentially, there will be no “official religion” forced upon the citizens. The Free Exercise Clause allows people to freely take part in any religion and partake in religious rituals.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Christian Nation Response
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Christian Nation Response

    The first amendment clearly estates that introduction of new religions are acceptable and there’s no uphold to the citizens in which they have to be Christians. The amendment undoubtedly mentions the root of the United States as “We the people” and not declaring any religious believes or ideas. In the entire Constitution, there’s not mentioning of even once the name of God, Jesus or any particular deities. The treaty of Tripoli it’s an evidence that many didn’t acknowledge it yet, this treaty was made by George Washington. This treaty lucidly estates that Unites States it is not a Christian…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Importance Of Under God In The Pledge Of Allegiance
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Importance Of Under God In The Pledge Of Allegiance

    The pledge of allegiance has remained an important part of the American legacy and culture. It takes part in the American school system, in American sports, and in many other areas. Many say that the pledge holds a place in their hearts, where it allows them to show their pride for their country. But in this pledge there are two words that have a tendency ring in the ears of many Americans, “under god.” In a country that is proud of the separation of church and state, we leave these words in a pledge that is said everyday by millions of Americans who believe and trust the right of separation of church of state yet we fail to do this for a major component in American culture. The words “under god” hold little meaning and should not be placed in the pledge of allegiance, they should be removed permanently.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Reflections on the First Amendment
    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Reflections on the First Amendment

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (First Amendment Center, 2008)…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Against The Christian Cross
    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Against The Christian Cross

    After the 9/11 attack, piles and piles of rubble were left sitting in New York after the collision of the Twin Towers. While searching through the rubble, one item was not damaged. That one item, a Christian cross, was taken to court to be banned from being displayed in the museum and memorial (Armstrong). Many people strongly disagreed with the thought of taking the cross to law enforcement and decided to argue against the idea to keep it and have it displayed in the museum to honor those who had to sacrifice their lives during the attack. The Christian cross is a clear symbol for the religion (The Cross at Ground). This can be agreed by any non-Christian as well (The Cross at Ground). If this problem wasn’t addressed, the faith that was coming…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Words Should Be Removed Persuasive Essay
    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Words Should Be Removed Persuasive Essay

    The first reason some people claim the words should be removed is because of their belief that the words violet the constitution. The constitution says in the first amendment that you have the freedom of religion. If the U.S. tries to establish an official religion then it would violate the constitution.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Flag Burning & Freedom of Speech

    In spite of this, the freedom to protest via burning of the flag is protected by law. The most recent occurrence of when the Supreme Court had to re-establish this was in 1989, in the case of Texas vs. Johnson. According to an article posted online by a website known as the Law Library, Gregory Lee Johnson had been convicted of “desecrating a venerated object in violation of Texas Penal Code section 42.09(a) (3)”. He had been given a fine of two thousand dollars and a sentence of a year in prison. Fortunately, his conviction was reversed by the Supreme Court. That same article went on to say, “The Free Speech Clause, the court ruled, forbids the government from establishing an orthodox symbol of national unity that is insulated from public criticism, symbolic or otherwise”.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics