Preview

Crj 316 Criminal Sentencing Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crj 316 Criminal Sentencing Research Paper
Criminal Sentencing
Nathan McCann
CMRJ 316
January 19, 2014
Sara Spivey, M.A.

Abstract
Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.
…show more content…
The State’s Penal Code will have guidelines for maximum and minimum sentences that can be imposed for specific crimes which will help guide the judge in making his or her decision. The defense attorney can also bring up certain points on behalf of the offender that may persuade the judge to impose a more lenient sentence. Such factors may be whether or not the offender has previously served time in jail or prison, whether the offender has a relatively clean criminal history, or no criminal history at all, or how involved in the commission of the crime the offender actually was (if there is more than one defendant). There are also aggravating circumstances such as the use of a weapon in the commission of the crime that could persuade the judge to impose a harsher sentence (NOLO, …show more content…
A judge will take into account the guidelines set forth by the State’s Penal Code, as well as those brought forward by the defense attorney. An offender’s criminal history, involvement in the crime, and the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime will all be considered in deciding whether to hand down a harsher or more lenient punishment. An offender who is considered a first-time offender may be granted leniency or a reduced sentence, but strong arguments can be made in favor and opposition of such a practice. Finally, punishment serves multiple purposes, for the victims of crime as well as the public, and the benefit for all involved should be considered. Ultimately, the judge will review all mitigating circumstances and deliver what he or she believes to be a fair sentence for each individual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing and punishment has actively involved the discretion of judges and magistrates in affecting the decision of the sentencing. Discretion involves the power of Judges and magistrates to determine the most appropriate sentence for a case. Allowing judicial officers to decide sentences on a case by case basis and thus permitting them to take into account the various circumstances. Many factors influence the role discretion plays or alternatively doesn’t play in the sentencing and punishment of offenders. This includes statutory guidelines, mandatory sentencing, aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the use of victim impact statements.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan Unit 3 Paper

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this assignment I will define indeterminate and determinate sentencing. I will also support an argument that will be effective for addressing a crime. Finally I will summarize my assessment of the sentencing models.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons for plea bargains. In most cases, the plea bargain is to avoid the uncertainty of the jury trial. In other cases, a defendant may have pertenant information regarding other criminals allowing the broader prosecution of other crimes. And in still other cases, prosecutors may be convinced that they have the right defendant and an accurate charge as to the crimes committed but lack the evidence necessary to bring the successful conviction against them. Regardless of the reasoning behind plea bargining, the process is brought into motion upon the descretion of the prosecutor. The empowerment of legal sentencing through the prosecutor brings many questions regarding the legitimacy of the process and the effects that it may have on the accused, regardless of guilt or innocence.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to the criminal process, it typically ends when a defendant is found not guilty. However, in retrospect, it does not end whenever a defendant is found guilty, and that is for three primary reasons: 1) the accused must be sentenced; 2) the accused can and often does appeal their conviction; and 3) in the event that the accused’s appeal fails to succeed, the U.S. Constitution provides for them the right to habeas corpus, which is a method of challenging the constitutionality of one’s confinement (Worrall, 2010). However, for the basis of this article, the focus will be placed on issues relating to generalized sentencing as well as the impact of the controversial subject of sentencing guidelines.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Convicted felons can be punished in many different ways, but one thing is sure it would not be cruel and unusual. Before we look at how we punish offenders we must first understand why we are punishing them. The general purpose behind punishment is to inflict upon criminals some kind of suffering for the crime that they have committed or to protect society from those considered too dangerous to live amongst us. Punishment, a necessary evil, is sometimes required to deter law violators from repeating their crime and to serve as an example to others who would also violate the law. Schmalleger, Frank J. Criminal Justice Today An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (81).…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Punishment Philosophies

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The universality of justice is a predominant concern of any nation that strives for true democracy, and in the U.S., this pursuit is largely undertaken in the court system. If the general basis for an action to constitute a crime lies in the willful and unsanctioned dispossession of another's life, liberty, or property, then the punitive power of the state to deprive the transgressor of these same rights, in the name of justice, must be exacted with a similar degree of concern. To this end, a variety of punishment philosophies, giving differing weight to the interests of victims, criminals, and society, have developed to clarify the notion, and to influence the practice of justice. While the philosophies of deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, retribution, and restoration can be perceived to prioritize the considerations of victims and society, the handling of youth offenders in juvenile courts, as well as the appellate process, are expressions of consideration for the accused. It is largely agreed upon that punishment for the sole purpose of vengeance is detrimental to the ideals of justice and civility.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our United States Corrections System has two specific ways into having people pay for their crimes. One way is punishment. People of the victims or even the victims believe this is the best way to get their justice. The second is rehabilitation. This way is good to give an offender a second chance in society and it gives them self- being. This also gives them the opportunity to accomplish academic and trading skills. (Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (11th ed.), 2011. Schmalleger, F. Publisher: Upper Saddle River, N.J., Pearson Education. TSBN: 135074096).…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dozens of writers, reformists and activists have already narrated the story of America's harrowing prison epidemic spread wide by the politics of corporate greed and fueled daily by scapegoating the poor and vulnerable. With nearly twenty years experience in public policy development, criminal justice reform, and promoting alternatives to confinement, now comes Marc Mauer, Assistant Director of The Sentencing Project, a national organization based in Washington, D.C. which advocates for substantial changes in our ways of punishing criminal…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the courts study the criminal justice system for two reasons adjudication and oversight. These functions are both very important to the safety of the public, and smooth operation of the court system. If either one of the functions were not present the court system could not operate effectively. The judges and prosecutors must decide what laws should be applied, how there are applied, and what to do when they find incorrect information or incorrect use of power.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The general factors that influence a judge's sentencing decisions are statutory provisions, philosophical rationales, organizational considerations, presentence investigation reports. Judge are free to tailor fit a punishment for a sentence within its limit. A judge can order the offender to pay restitution to the victim, survivors, or a community for injury inflicted. The offender can attain credits from jail time while waiting for trial and deduct it from their prison sentence. There can be a suspended imprisonment granted. Also, a "time served" can be render by the judge, in which the offender can be released. If an offender is convicted of two or more prison sentences a judge can arrange the sentences to run together or separate time.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once an offender is found guilty in the court of law, an appropriate sentence will be allocated by the judge; this is the process of sentencing (Roberts, 2013). The Criminal Justice Act 2003 identifies the main purposes for punishment. When allocating a sentence, any court sentencing an offender must regard: the punishment of the offender, the reduction of crime due to the punishment, the rehabilitation of the offender, the protection of the public and the ‘making a mends’ for those affected by the offending (Bartels, 2009).…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays