Critical Social Science Argument Essay
Do people who frequently use technology are more likely to become antisocial as opposed to those who do not use it? Technology affects the society we live in today. When you’re on a train, or a bus; mostly what you see is people's eyes glued to their phone screens. Once you leave class, the first thing a student mostly does look at is their phones. Often people who are in the same room are texting each other. What happened to communicating face to face. Are humans losing their communication skills due to the outburst of technology being surrounded by us on a daily basis? “Most children and teens spend 75 percent of their waking lives with their eyes fixed on a screen, according to a recent study performed by the International Center for Media
…show more content…
The supposed dearth of face-to-face interaction can be traced all the way back to dated pursuits like reading newspapers” An argument stated, saying it is not technology to blame. That humans have been becoming less interactive since the invention of the newsprint. So what is the real reason to this? Why is it when we put down our phones or are in area where there is no connection to the technology world; do we feel lonely? This argument relates more towards critical social science. Critical social science is research carried out explicitly to create knowledge that can be used to bring about social change. It is considered to be critical social science due to this type of research is creating knowledge towards humans becoming more anti social. This type of argument may face challenges. A typical challenge would be an argument that we are not becoming antisocial but just changing the way we communicate. As well as “Others counter that online social networks supplement face-to-face sociability, they don’t replace it. These people argue that we can expand our social horizons online, deepening our connections to the world around us, and at the same time take advantage of technology to make our closest relationships even closer.”Some may blame it on anxiety for this type of
The supposed dearth of face-to-face interaction can be traced all the way back to dated pursuits like reading newspapers” An argument stated, saying it is not technology to blame. That humans have been becoming less interactive since the invention of the newsprint. So what is the real reason to this? Why is it when we put down our phones or are in area where there is no connection to the technology world; do we feel lonely? This argument relates more towards critical social science. Critical social science is research carried out explicitly to create knowledge that can be used to bring about social change. It is considered to be critical social science due to this type of research is creating knowledge towards humans becoming more anti social. This type of argument may face challenges. A typical challenge would be an argument that we are not becoming antisocial but just changing the way we communicate. As well as “Others counter that online social networks supplement face-to-face sociability, they don’t replace it. These people argue that we can expand our social horizons online, deepening our connections to the world around us, and at the same time take advantage of technology to make our closest relationships even closer.”Some may blame it on anxiety for this type of