The author respectfully presents both sides of the story. First, they state how same-sex marriage is now legal in New York. Then the author acknowledges there are still opposing conditions that the new law has no rights over; such as the right for certain entities to refuse a wedding or wedding party for same-sex couples. The author shows a tone in which he is for gay marriage. This is evident in his negative tone towards everything that is still wrong with the laws and rights for same-sex marriage. I believe the tone the author uses is a strength considering they are for same-sex marriage.
In this article, the author uses minimal facts, and no quotes or expert opinion to support his writing. The organization of this article is poor, in my opinion. One example of this is how the author went off topic in the second to last paragraph of the article. The author states other laws and bills that were passed during the legislative session. Other than how the author implies that the marriage equality law was the most important of the legislative session, I do not see benefit to bringing this into the article.
Overall, the article was informative and easy to read. The author did an exceptional job at stating what is still wrong with the gay marriage laws. But failed to write much about the positives and how gay marriage is “A Milestone”. I would say the article holds strong effectiveness for the average reader. But for someone who is critically reading the article, it could have been written with more depth.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal is an article written by Thomas B. Stoddard, an executive director of a gay rights organization called the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. In the aforementioned article, he painfully illustrates the injustices and imbalance of the typical “traditional marriage” and its impact on average, devoted homosexual couples. More than just state his opinion on marriage between homosexuals, he emphasizes the injustice by accentuating real world situations. Not only does Stoddard denote the negative effects on loving gay couples, he illuminates the idea of gay marriage as something beneficial not only to gay partners, but society as a whole (722).…
- 396 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In fact, to prove his point Olson used a powerful and compelling argumentation in favor of gay marriage. He enlightened the reader that this issue is not only a social problem but it involves culture, history, and tolerance of the peoples’ differences. His paper has strong persuasive arguments that are well measured, methodical, well evidenced and critical. The author states that he is a conservative person however; on this issue he takes a liberal state of mind. He is clearly subjective in his writing for he shares in paragraph 26 the reactions to his lawsuit. “I have certainly heard anger, resentment and hostility, and words like “betrayal” and other pointedly graphic criticism.” The paper is well focused on its goal and honest for it is sure not easy for Olson to criticize his loyal conservative friends and act against their believes when he actually belongs to that party. Moreover, Mr. Olson's rhetorical repetitive question “… on the basis of their sexual orientation?” in paragraphs 8 and 13 is used to emphasize the importance of acceptance of others and overcoming the differences when it comes to the sexual orientation which is a very private matter. He also shocks the reader by ending his article stating that the gay marriage is not an issue about opened and so called closed minded people but it is an American issue, thus relating this topic to all Americans all…
- 1014 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Please read “A Gay Man’s Case Against Gay Marriage” by Michael Bronski on pages 687–690 of your text. Then reply with your analysis of the rhetorical situation of the essay. What is Bronski’s reason for writing? What is his purpose and angle? Who do you think his audience might be? Finally, think about the writing strategies Bronski uses to achieve his overall purpose. Based on our discussions of commentary and argumentative writing, what strategies do you think he relies upon to present his position?…
- 179 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There is still skepticism from opinions that range in a form of discrimination because neglect is present. Their demand to be able to enjoy the benefits and recognition of being married are irrelevant showing an effect on the family as a whole. Because it is so controversial it gives way to confusion in establishing the fact, that it is indeed a marriage that same-sex couples share with one another. In my opinion they have put same-sex couples as second class status and deemed there is little room to recognize their form of long term relationship. Same-sex couples have been denied the benefits that heterosexual couples are given. The mode of acceptance in society has not improved, even though there are indications that this change in opinion, will prove to be beneficial for all society today. Repetition of inequality of rights through past history has shown its devastations of cruelty on society or have we forgotten this…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Citing a recent court ruling that allowed a gay individual to stay in his partner’s rent controlled apartment after his partner passed away, thus qualifying the individual as a member of the deceased partner’s family, Sullivan uses many sagacious points that most readers can relate to. His choice of words and examples make it seem that he is passionate about this issue and the preservation of the family unit in general. Sullivan makes a prudent argument as to what could be gained by encouraging loving, committed relationships. Legalizing gay marriage would promote social acceptance, the same economic advantages and relationship security between two people who love one another. This would also encourage a deeper commitment that is harder to get out of. Also pointed out is that legalizing gay marriage would not jeopardize the legitimacy of traditional, straight marriage. Allowing the same rights to fellow individuals could only help to promote that which we all hold dear, family…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Same sex marriage legalization has been a continue argument for years. It was admitted as legal by California government in June 2008, but it was halted due to the passage of Proposition 8. There is no wonder why people take Proposition 8 as hate towards LGBTI community. Thus, Morse wrote a article in National Review Online to appeal more supporter, and to argue there is no hate toward LGBTI community from Proposition 8. Her rhetorical choices help to increase the probability that there are more readers will support her argument.…
- 380 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Throughout this opinionated editorial, the author tries to convince her audience that same sex marriage should not be legalized. She hopes to appeal to the readers of the Wall Street Journal by the use of facts, rhetorical appeals, and religious accusations.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…
- 1093 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…
- 305 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Judging by the title of this article written by Lisa Miller, readers would tend to believe that this would be a piece of work written to support the religious side of the war on gay marriage. However, when reading through just the first paragraph, it becomes apparent that the essay is actually contributing to the discrimination of the Bible. This instantly detracts from the author’s argument because this places a biased predecessor on the information to come. The author places emphasis on the fact that there is no reason why gay marriage should be illegal. Proving her essay to be void of valuable information, this author did not effectively and correctly present the facts on…
- 1339 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Murray Lipp’s article, “7 Ways the U.S.A. Benefits From the Legalization of Gay Marriage,” he argues that same-sex marriage has many benefits despite majority thought. Lipp argues points that show how the legalization of same-sex marriage benefits America, from individual well-being to boosting of the economy. Contrary to more popular belief, he argues that there are lots of benefits to the legalization and that every state should be moved to fight for the power it brings to the people and America as a nation. On top of Lipp’s profoundly valid arguments and coverage of the spectrum of benefits, from the most immense to small-scale, he uses ethos, pathos and evidence effectively to move his readers and capture an audience from both sides of the issue.…
- 810 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
"By recognizing and extending the definition of marriage to reflect today's greater openness towards, and recognition of, same-sex relationships, the legislation does not weaken the institution of marriage. On the contrary, it takes it forward, it strengthens it. It helps to perpetuate it," she said.…
- 1068 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays