Preview

Criminal Liability Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
83 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Liability Case Study
Discuss the criminal liability of Kai with respect to the incident with the digger. (You should ignore the brain damage suffered by Lionel as a results of the injection)

Kai would be charged with assault under section39 of the criminal justice act 1977. The actus reus of assault is to out the victim in immediate fear of unlawful violence. However it could be argued that he should be charged with battery also under section 39 because he did apply unlawful force upon
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Manifest Criminality Case Study
    • 2642 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Manifest Criminality Case Study

    1. What is the principle of manifest criminality? Provide an example. Explain why you agree or disagree.…

    • 2642 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Questions concerning criminal law
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Questions concerning criminal law

    The specific aims and purposes of criminal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. “Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punishment for violations deter.” (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). Criminal law intimidates citizens because most people won’t want to be arrested or have a write up on their personal record. Criminal law controls behaviour but only outlines what a good citizen should be doing, by creating laws. “More precisely, the term refers to substantive criminal law - a body of law that prohibits certain kinds of conduct and imposes sanctions for unlawful behaviour.” (The Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1.) Having laws and not enforcing them is pointless, so by creating a law you need to enforce it strictly so people stop committing the offence. Like in Alberta and other parts of Canada the Distracted Driving law was in full effect and anyone caught texting and driving or anything along those lines was given a major demerit dock, and a hefty ticket you need to pay. By doing this it enforces the law and creates that thought in the back of the citizens head that says “should I do that? What will happen if I text and drive and get caught?”. However, most criminals don’t have that subconscious thought and don’t care if they get caught breaking the law, that’s why so many criminals are re-offenders. Laws are either…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside Criminal Law
    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Inside Criminal Law

    The first main function of criminal law is protect and punish. It is also known as the legal function. The main function of this legal function is to uphold social order by protecting the citizens from criminal harm. There are two types of criminal harm. The first is harm caused to individual people both to themselves and their property. These crimes can be from murder, assault, theft or even arson. The second harm can be cause to everyone by unsafe foods, contaminated city drinking water, poorly maintained sewage and unsafe buildings.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Liability

    Ashok could be criminally liable for the common law offence of assault; an assault takes place when the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful violence.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    essay for NFO in law
    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    essay for NFO in law

    Discuss the criminal liability of Jameela and of Leah arising out of the incidents in the town.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Evaluation
    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Law Evaluation

    Meyer, J.F. and Grant, D.R. (2003). The Courts in our Crimal Justice System. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Prentice Hall.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Criminal Behavior and the Law
    • 2814 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Criminal Behavior and the Law

    Nucera, K. (1995). Contemporary Issues in the Press White-Collar vs. Street Crime. Retrieved from http://chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/nucera95.html.…

    • 2814 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Defense
    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal Defense

    Self-defense is the justification of the threat or use of force when an individual feels that they are in immediate or imminent danger to their life or bodily harm. The cases I researched were UNITED STATES V. PETERSON, 483 F.2D 1222 (D.C. CIR. 1973), OPINION BY: ROBINSON, J. and PEOPLE V. CEBALLOS, 526 P.2D 241 (CAL. 1974), OPINION BY: BURKE, J. In both cases the defenses entered a contest of self-defense. In the case of UNITED STATES V. PETERSON, the defendant claimed self- defense based on the fact that deceased, Charles Kiett put Peterson’s life in danger once Kiett advanced toward Peterson with a lug wrench raised in his hand. In the case of the PEOPLE V. CEBALLOS, the defendant after noticing pry marks on his garage door set up a trap utilizing a .22 caliber pistol. In both cases the defenses were found to not be justifiable. In the case of UNITED STATES V. PETERSON, PETERSON was not acquitted of the charges and found guilty of manslaughter. Regarding the case of the PEOPLE V. CEBALLOS, CEBALLOS was found guilty of assault with a deadly weapon.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Defense Case Analysis
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal Defense Case Analysis

    When a person is charged with a crime the type of defense that they choose could ultimately determine their fate. There are many different types of defenses that exist in our criminal justice system. In this paper I will be taking a brief look at two different cases that have implored two different types of criminal defenses. I will look at the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to demonstrate defense. I will describe how justification and excuse played a role in the cases and I will also be describing the outcome of each case.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Concepts of Criminal Law
    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Concepts of Criminal Law

    The Choice of Evil Defense is also called the General Defense of Necessity. This defense justifies an act that may be a crime but is done to prevent a greater evil. “the choice of evil’s defense consists of proving that the defendant made the right choice, the only choice—namely, the necessity of choosing now to do a lesser evil to avoid a greater evil” (Samaha, 2014). The Model Penal Code contains the elements in three steps: 1) Identify the evils. 2) Rank the evils that are present. 3) Choose the evil that would be the best and that something is going to happen immediately. The choice of evil’s defense says it is better to commit a lesser crime to avoid the harm a greater crime would cause.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Lydia's Criminal Liability Case Study
    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Lydia's Criminal Liability Case Study

    As a result of Lydia’s actions, Danielle and Gemma have died. Therefore, the extent of Lydia’s criminal liability for their deaths must be explored. Lydia’s culpability for their Murders must be explored before lesser offences of manslaughter can be considered. The majority of law pertaining to Murder is found in the Common Law, rather than being defined in statutes like a great deal of criminal offences. Murder, as defined by Lord Coke, is when a man of “sound memory” at the age of “discretion”, “unlawfully” kills any “reasonable creature” in any “county of the realm”. Prerequisites for murder include that the act take place “under the queen’s peace” with “malice aforethought”.1 This means that the Defendant must not be legally insane, should…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Individual Criminal Defense Case Analysis Paper
    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Individual Criminal Defense Case Analysis Paper

    Explain the Nature and Types of Defenses Used in the Cases and what Evidence was used to demonstrate the defense…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice Case Study
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Justice Case Study

    The individual assignment is to read the Case Study, A Diamond Personality, and answer the four discussion questions that follow the Case Study. The subject of this personality case study is Oscar Rodriguez. Rodriguez is a 38-year-old entrepreneur who owns an Internet business that sells loose diamonds to various buyers. This paper will summarize the case study and then conclude by answering the personality questions.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Defense Case Study
    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Defense Case Study

    According to the textbook, CJ4, the four most crucial justification criminal defenses are Duress, Justifiable use of Force, Necessity, and Entrapment. Duress, as a definition, is when a person commits a crime against their own will (Gaines & Miller, 2015, p. 64). An example of this is the case, Dixon v. United States; in this case, Dixon provides false information to a gun dealer, and as a result was able to purchase seven firearms (Cornell University Law School, 2006). In this case, she is claiming to have been under duress. To better explain, according to Dixon’s statement, she only purchased the weapons because her boyfriend threaded to kill her and her three daughters (Cornell University Law School, 2006). Moving on, Justifiable use of…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Introduction to Criminal Law
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Introduction to Criminal Law

    My Attorney that I work for has advised the judge (the accused) to file a motion to suppress his statements. Because the arresting officers failed to read the judge his Miranda Rights thus, the judge’s statements were illegally obtained. I am in favor of this position, because the Judge made statements that may incriminate himself. This is great advise for the opposing counsel to protect his or her client, knowing that the prosecution is going to dispute the motion on the grounds that the Judge is aware of his rights because he is an attorney and a Judge.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics