Criminal Liabilities of Public Official

Better Essays
CRIMINAL LIABILITIES OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS

misfeasance

is any person, who, by direct provision of law, popular election or appointment by competent authority, shall take part in the performance of public functions in the government, or shall perform in said government or in any of its branches public duties as an employee, agent or subordinate official of any rank or class

Dereliction of Duty by Officers Related to the Administration of Justice
Articles 204 - 209
Art. 204. Knowingly rendering unjust judgment. – Any judge who shall knowingly render an unjust judgment in any case submitted to him for decision, shall be punished by prison mayor and perpetual absolute disqualification. one which is not in accordance with the law and the evidence

applying a law which has been repealed or a decision which has been reversed

Art. 205. Judgment rendered through negligence. –
Any judge who, by reason of inexcusable negligence or ignorance shall render a manifestly unjust judgment in any case submitted to him for decision shall be punished by arresto mayor and temporary special disqualification.

Art. 206. Unjust interlocutory order. – Any judge who shall knowingly render an unjust interlocutory order or decree shall suffer the penalty of arresto mayor in its minimum period and suspension; but if he shall have acted by reason of inexcusable negligence or ignorance and the interlocutory order or decree be manifestly unjust, the penalty shall be suspension . granting bail to a nonbailable offense

Art. 207. Malicious delay in the administration of justice. –
The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon any judge guilty of malicious delay in the administration of justice. frequent grant of postponements, delaying the decision or failure to render the decision within the time allowed by law

However, before a Judge can be charged for Rendering an Unjust
Judgment or Unjust

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Liability Essay Criminal liabilities are conditions of being actually or potentially subject to a legal obligation. Liability means legal responsibility for one’s acts or omission, also when acts which harms society, and which are prosecuted by the government. Sometimes certain negligence can lead to criminal liability. Liability needs to be distinguished from the following concepts: * culpability (purposely, knowingly, recklessly, negligently) - infers intent * capacity…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    criminal liability

    • 1162 Words
    • 4 Pages

    law, in criminal law there are two principles of criminal liability which have to be relied upon in order to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused person. Therefore the aim of this essay is to discuss the two principles of law for criminal liability with reference to the Penal Code Act, Chapter Eighty Seven (87) of the Laws of Zambia and Zambian decided cases. In order to effectively do this, the essay will begin by generally talking about the two principles of law for criminal liability…

    • 1162 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 2577 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Principles of Criminal Liability 1/16/2013 Student ID: Word Count: 2482 Criminal activities are very common in our society. With the intention to hamper the property of other people or causing ill effect to others, criminal activities are occurred usually. Sometimes people involve themselves with some activities to injure others due to personal clash or from ill temperament. Some activities which may be done to cause simple injury…

    • 2577 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Using the IDEA structure for Criminal Law application questions – example answer. In response to questions from the Jan’ ’10 exam. 1bi) “Discuss the criminal liability of Ashok for the incident at the traffic lights.” * Identify and Define Ashok could be criminally liable for the common law offence of assault; an assault takes place when the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful violence. * Explain Actus Reus and Mens Rea The actus reus…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Identification Doctrine: Limitations in Establishing Corporate Criminal Liability The identification doctrine is the traditional method by which companies are held liable under the principles of the common law. According to this theory, the solution for the problem of attributing the unlawful acts to a corporation for offences that require intention was to merge the identified individual with the corporation. For the purpose of establishing corporate liability, a company may be responsible for the wrongful acts…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Elements of Criminal Liability ACTUS REUS & MENS REA "Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea", or "an act does not make a man guilty unless his mind be also guilty (Burgess, 2004, p.8)." In criminal law, for an individual to commit a crime, there must be present two elements. They are: • Actus Reus (meaning guilty act – or omission); and • Mens Rea (meaning guilty mind). Actus Reus is the guilty act or omission in the commissioning of a crime. In short, it is what the offender does…

    • 2377 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    certain relationship established. Using case law and legal principles an attempt to justify such a duty in today’s society shall be considered. In considering its merits and drawbacks, with reasoned opinion, this essay shall conclude whether the UK criminal law should impose such a duty. In UK law it is an offence to fail to take reasonable steps to assist another person in peril in certain situations. Such duties as those arising from contract (R.v Pitwood [1902]), special relationships (Gibbins and…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the criminal liability of Kai with respect to the incident with the digger. (You should ignore the brain damage suffered by Lionel as a results of the injection) Kai would be charged with assault under section39 of the criminal justice act 1977. The actus reus of assault is to out the victim in immediate fear of unlawful violence. However it could be argued that he should be charged with battery also under section 39 because he did apply unlawful force upon…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Professional Regulations and Criminal Liabilities Pearl Street HCS/430 Joann Wilcox February 13, 2011 Consumer concerns have increased over the past few years because of the dramatic changes in health care information and its’ delivery (Benfield, Ashkanazi, Rozensky 2006). Each day patients put their physical health and trust in the hands of health care providers. Unfortunately, there have been times when the treatment provided, whether accidental or intentional, has caused harm to the patient…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professional Regulation and Criminal Liability July 16, 2015 HCS/430 Professional Regulation and Criminal Liability: Pharmacists A profession is “an occupation based on the mastery of a complex body of knowledge and skills. It is a vocation in which the practice of an art is used in the services of others” (Schmitz & Martin, 2008, p. 1). Belonging to a certain profession requires one to agree to demonstrate integrity, selflessness, competency as well as morality. This becomes the…

    • 1735 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays