Preview

Criminal Law Theory: Contrasting Defiance Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Law Theory: Contrasting Defiance Theory
Contrasting Defiance theory, Criminal Law theory implies individuals do understand what they are doing is wrong and the only factor that diverts them from crime is the fear of punishment further arguing that restorative justice undermines the law (Simester et al., 2014). On the contrary Sherman et al. (2005) made it clear there was no evidence found which supports the undermining of the law by the restorative justice approaches and it would benefit individuals worldwide, especially those who fall victim to personal crimes such as rape. Additionally Bottoms (2003) stated restorative justice would not be effective in contemporary society due to the victim and offender needed a relationship of some sort and in cases of stranger rape this isn’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arming Law-Abiding Theory

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A huge factor that played in the passing of these laws was that law-abiding citizens should be permitted to protect themselves in various situations. Concealed carry would be a deterrent effect upon criminals who came across an armed victim. Victims who carried concealed weapons may increase the level of risk that the criminal is taking.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In society, people always want to point a finger as to who did what and why. For centuries, theorists have come up with ideas to try to identify and explain why people commit crimes. What causes them the break the law, even when they know the repercussions for their actions. Many theories have been brought up, but only a few have surpassed time and are approved by society and law enforcement. These choice theories hypothesize on why how and why people commit crimes, they are also accepted through our society and they affect law enforcement as well as the government.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    two schools of criminology: the school of classics and the school of positivist. Simply put, the school of classics focused more on the crime and punishment of the criminal whereas the school of positivist focused on the criminal and how to typically “rehabilitate the criminal” in order to prevent the crime. Note that while there may be two distinct schools with differing ideas, there cannot be such a case that is so one sided that fits under that school exclusively, rather it must be a “combination of classical and positivist principles” (Kubrin 9). However,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The core of restorative justice is comprised on fundamental guiding values such as respect, individual dignity, inclusion, responsibility, humility, mutual care, and the reparation of harms (Pranis, 2007). Guiding values evoke individual values including respect, honesty, compassion, open-mindedness and patience, so as to maximize peace while considering the needs of the victim, offender, community and all other stakeholders (Zehr, 2002). Restorative justice is an alternative approach to the traditional punitive justice system that extends the definition of crime as existing beyond one specific violent act (Pepinsky, 2000). Contrary to what is considered in Western society’s view of crime,…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are empirical claims that restorative justice does not meet its own claims (Braithwaite 2002, Daly 2002, Van Ness 1993); philosophical and sociological claims that humans continue to carry base retributivist and vengeful motivations that are impervious to so-called transformative processes (Acorn 2004); legalistic claims that restorative justice unfairly coerces and manipulates its participants to forgive (victims) or confess and accept harsher terms (offenders) than legal rights and rules would permit in formal justice institutions and that restorative justice does not deliver equitable or equal justice (Dolinko 2003, Delgado 2000); anthropological critiques that concepts in restorative justice ideology are culturally specific and not universal (Avruch & Vejarano 2001) and that notions of community are social constructs and can be manipulated for bad ends (Weisberg 2003); and political claims that restorative justice processes will be manipulated, corrupted, co-opted, and deformed to produce oppression, more state surveillance and discipline, and more inappropriate social control (Abel 1982, Levrant et al. 1999).…

    • 4737 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss three forms of injustice or bias in the American corrections system as it applies to differing branches of government and criminal justice. First, intermediate sentencing for non-violent offenders and why it should be expanded. Second, Political bias in the judicial system in regards to light sentences to violent offenders. Lastly, I will discuss the pardon power of the executive branch politicians in our society and how it can be unjust due to bias.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Justice report

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Restorative justice is a theory of justice that relies on reconciliation rather than retribution. The most important principle is depended on the notion that a developed society operates with a balance of “respect for human rights and the acknowledgment of the responsibility and accountability by which the new democracy wishes to be characterized (Tutu page 54).” What’s required for the successes of restorative justice when an event occurs that disrupt the equilibrium, methods must be establish to restore the balance, so that members of the community, the victim, and offender, can come to terms with the incident and carry on with their lives. One such example is from No Future without Forgiveness by Desmond Tutu, “the central concern is the healing of breaches, the redressing of imbalances, the restoration of broken relations, a seeking to rehabilitate both the victim and the perpetrator, who should be given the opportunity to be reintegrated into the community he has injured by his offense (Tutu page 54).” In order for this to transpire, the wrongdoer must take responsibility for the circumstance that their conduct has caused…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    perceptions their needs become known. To address what these parties see as lacking can improve the system. What offenders and victims do seem to agree on is the benefit of the restorative drive of the process. Restorative justice can guide responses to a wider range of conflicts, including conflicts that do not involve an actual violation of law. The restorative justice philosophy as applied to schools views misconduct as a violation against people and damaging to relationships in the school and throughout the community.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Restorative Justice

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this case, restorative justice has the means to offer a unique opportunity to exchange wants, needs, ideas and thoughts between the parties affected. This allows the survivor and the offender to assess the assault and abuse as well as its consequences. Due to the involvement of both parties in the process, the victim no longer feels intimidated by the wrongdoer, which entirely reorganises their affiliation. Since both stakeholders hold the responsibility to express their motivation, ability and willingness to manage the outcomes of the event, it can be concluded that there is an overall greater compliance with agreements, as well as a reduced imprisonment and recidivism rate, which satisfied the interests of the victims, society and the offender(s). If this process is taken sincerely and with diligence, compassion and patience, it can be very successful in regaining control of the situation in terms of the victim, and righting the wrongs by the offender. Even with a lack of guarantees, restorative justice has a lot to offer to all stakeholders, including the potential to enlighten one’s understanding of the past events, as well as enriching lives and self-development of not only victims, but also their families as well as the offenders. “One can move one…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of restorative justice is not clearly defined; often referred to as a ‘movement,’ and presented as an option to the mainstream of criminal justice. Rather than harsh punishment to the offender, restorative justice will attempt to establish a connection between the victim and the offenders (Sharpe, 1998). RJ attempts to repair the harm the offender caused the victim(s). This concept initiated in the 1970s, to allow dialog between the victim and offender. In the 1990s, the program expanded to include the community, families and friends (Sharpe, 1998).…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is being overlooked is that restorative justice responses often contain retributive and punitive elements themselves – and sometimes, such as in serious cases, necessarily so. (Barton 1999, Ch. 10) Therefore, blaming retribution, or even punitiveness, for the ills of the criminal justice system is largely beside the point. Punishment and retribution cannot be ruled out by any system of justice. By implication, a more plausible critique of the status quo is…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Restorative Justice

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Restorative Justice is an alternative to the traditional system. Even though restorative justice will never replace the traditional system, it has a balanced focus on the person harmed, the person causing the harm and the affected community, rather than just the crime through the eyes of the law. Restorative Justice is always voluntary for the victims, and the offenders have to be willing to cooperate and they have to want to do this. Restorative Justice is a forward-looking, preventive way of understanding crime in its social context. (Dr. Tom Cavanagh; Garder Emily)…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The restorative justice movement originally began as an effort to rethink the needs which crimes create, as well as the roles implicit in crimes. Restorative justice advocates were concerned about needs that were not being met in the usual justice process [ (Zehr, 2002) ].…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance is any form of behavior that violates the norms of a society. Behavior that is considered deviant is usually condemned and often punished. Crime is a more dangerous and extreme form of deviance. The term can be defined as a deviant type of behavior that is prohibited by law and is punishable by the government. Many laws divide crimes into categories depending on the seriousness of the offense, the age of the offender, the punishment that can be administered and the actual court. According to sociologists there are multiple explanations for crime and sociologists have created different theories. Also, there are many types of activities that are considered crime and the criminal justice system has the responsibility to keep all citizens of a country safe and secure.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays