Preview

Criminal Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Law
ZIMBABWE INSTITUTE OF LEGAL STUDIES

DIPLOMA IN APPLIED LAW

Name: Laura Bandah

Reg. Number: Z120117K

Intake: August 2012, Semester 1

Course: Criminal Law and Statutory Offences

Course Code: CLSO 104

Tutor’s Name: Ms L. Mhuru Question: (a) The Zimbabwean law does not normally impose liability or failure to act despite the fact that there may be compelling moral justifications for doing so. For example, the courts have often explained that there is no legal duty upon a stranger to rescue a drowning child.
Consider whether the current legal principles governing omissions are satisfactory and state and explain types of situations where there will be a legal duty to act. [15] (b) Dr Rue the number one plastic surgeon in the country is charged with assault in terms of s 89 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform Act) Chapter 9:23. He finds himself in this situation because of the following rather unfortunate circumstances:

Early in April, Shelly a 22 year old Zimbabwe Institute of Legal Studies student who wanted to enter for Miss Harare beauty pageant approached him. She instructed him to operate her nose into a desired shape. He accepted the instructions and accordingly prepared the relevant papers. He informed her of all the risks involved and she duly signed the consent forms. He carried out the operation with the utmost due diligence. Unfortunately one tissue in Shelly’s nose was damaged beyond redemption. Her entire nose had to be amputated to avoid further complications.

Briefly discuss whether the accused’s criminal liability may be justified by consent.

Due Date: 14 September 2012
The Zimbabwean law does not normally impose liability or failure to act despite the fact that there may be compelling moral justifications for doing so. For example, the courts have often explained that there is no legal duty upon a stranger to rescue a drowning child.
Consider whether the current legal principles governing



Bibliography: [ 3 ]. 1991 (1) ZLR 227 (S). [ 6 ]. 1960 (1) SA 473 (FS) at 482. [ 8 ]. 1977 (2) RLR. [ 11 ]. 1994 (2) ZLR 410 (S). [ 12 ]. 1966 (2) SA 259 (A). [ 13 ]. 1988 (2) ZLR 402. [ 16 ]. L. Madhuku, An Introduction to Zimbabwean Law, Weaver Press (2010) at p2. [ 25 ]. 1927 CPD 16. [ 32 ]. 1977 (3) SA 628 (E). [ 34 ]. 1965 (4) SA. [ 36 ]. 2001 (1) SACR 156 (C). [ 39 ]. 1984 (1) ZLR. [ 41 ]. 1967 (1) SA 387 (A). [ 42 ]. Jonathan Burchell, Unravelling compulsion draws provocation and intoxication into focus(2001) 14 SACJ 365 [ 43 ] [ 45 ]. (1884) 14 QBD 273. [ 47 ]. 1972 (3) SA 1 (A). [ 55 ]. 1982 (3) SA 772 (A) [ 57 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bsbwor501 Final Exam

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With vicarious liability, the acting defendant is NOT criminally responsible for his or her conduct.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this section of the essay, we will prove the that the laws are fair from a personal injury law standpoint. According to law 218, “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused death, his hands shall be cut off. I believe this is fair because, a surgeon should know what he’s doing. I also belive if someone is “punished” for another's actions, the one who caused the injury should be punished also.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cheat Sheet

    • 3020 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Legal obligation is not meant to pick up the slack for a moral or ethical obligation…

    • 3020 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 outline

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    e. Human conduct rule- the requirement that some human action is required for criminal liability; thought is not sufficient…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an express warranty by the defendant. A jury in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas found in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appealed the decision.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An omission can amount to the Actus Reus of a crime, however, the general rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act. For example if you see a person drowning you have no obligation to help them. This could be seen as a gap in the law therefore it could said that this is a reason that English Criminal law should impose a duty on general citizens to assist a person in peril. Although this is the general rule there are exceptions. The first exception is when there is a statutory duty to act for example stopping at a red light under the Road Traffic Act 1988. Another example is where there is a contractual duty to act. This where it states in a defendants employment contract that they must act. A case example would be in R v Pitwood where the defendant failed to lower the level crossing barrier which resulted in the victim dying. The defendant was found guilty of manslaughter as he had breached his contractual duty. Finally the third exception is when the duty is imposed by law. There are three situations in which this may happen; failing to rectify a dangerous situation as in R v Miller, when there has been a voluntary acceptance of a duty as in Dobinson v Stone and finally misconduct in a public office as in R v…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The best way to avoid punishment is by not committing the error by which you will be punished. However, not often as human beings we think why do we have to obey the laws that the government executes. We only obey them because the constitution and the government say so. If as citizens we have a political and moral obligation to follow the laws then why there are still many people who do not obey them? A. John Simmons discusses the dilemma between legitimacy and justification and the implication both of these have when it comes to following the law. According to Simmons, justification can only be express by showing that the state is morally permissible or prudentially desirable. In order words, people have to decide whether or not they want…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obligation isn't always driven by reason. What a person feels obliged to do may not be the most reasonable choice of action. In fact, this choice may even physically harm them in some way. The following short stories, The Inheritor, Tell-Tale Heart, and Harrison Bergeron are all examples of a sense of obligation leading someone to make an unreasonable choice. In The Inheritor, Tell-Tale Heart, and Harrison Bergeron, the main characters are all forced to make a choice to either follow what they felt was their moral obligation as a human being or to ensure their own safety.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Traditionally the law of torts in Australia and many other common law countries (e.g. England, Canada) have been reluctant to impose upon bystanders a general duty to aid the proverbial ‘baby drowning in a puddle of water, ' though there have been several exceptions to the general rule which the courts have distinguished, usually where some sort of prior relationship exists between the parties. Protagonists of a ‘duty to rescue ' tend to base their arguments around the idea that contemporary morality demands the law impose some sort of co-ercive measure upon those who chance by others in dire straits, drawing comparisons with areas where law reflects morality, as well as examples of jurisdictions where legislation introducing a positive duty to rescue have been enforced. Antagonists to the idea of an affirmative duty to act to the benefit of others tend to stress the importance of individual liberties within democratic societies on the one hand, and highlight the problems present in setting criteria for when a duty should exist in the other. As Australian tort law attempts to adhere to the principle of restitutio and prevent the emergence of a ‘culture of blame ' simultaneously, the result is that there is not likely to be a single ‘correct ' answer, however this essay will attempt to justify the imposition of a limited duty in a manner which considers both sides of the argument.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics in Criminal Justice

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Actions and inactions all have moral implications; they are either right or wrong depending on the individual and what s/he believes or feels is right or wrong. Each person’s conduct can and does have implications and ramifications. For every action there is an equal and/or opposite reaction not only for the average person but also for professionals; especially in the area of law enforcement, criminal justice, and criminal procedure. Just discussed is known as moral philosophy.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jelínková, H. (2011), Slang Used among British and Czech Teenagers. Zlín: Tomas Bata University in Zlín.…

    • 4165 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2010). Criminal law today: An introduction with capstone cases (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. E.H. Grubb´ , Priority in the therapeutic use of X-rays. Radiology 21, 156–162 (1933)…

    • 5906 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whistle Blower Case Paper

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If Dr. Arafiles did not possess surgical privileges, it should not have been permissible for him to perform a skin graft. Because he performed a skin graft without surgical privileges, his improper surgical procedure with a skin graft was supposed to be documented in peer review records to address the concerns for the poor quality and safety issues and determinations of Dr. Arafiles credentials. The peer review records are important evidence and are often used by plaintiffs in litigation to identify medical negligence. For instance, in chapter 4, on page 77, peer review was used in Adams v. St. Francis Regional Medical Center case to determine medical negligence of a nurse who was responsible for the death of plaintiff’s daughter (Brodnik, Rinehart-Thompson, & Reynolds, 2013).…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue here is the possible problem in distinguishing injustice from manifest injustice – but this is question of legal certainty. Natural law’s substantive thesis is that in the case of extreme injustice, the problem of morality is also a problem of legality. It cannot be attacked merely with a formal argument charging lack of clarity.…

    • 2753 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics