Criminal Justice

Good Essays
Read the insanity defense articles in the "insanity defense" folder (found in module 2). Summarize the insanity defense in Arizona. What purpose do you think this defense was intended to serve? Do you think the "insanity defense" should exist? Use your module readings to support your answer.

Arizona uses a modified version of the M 'naghten rule (A test for criminal insanity). The defense team is responsible for proving that. The state of Arizona also uses the "Guilty but insane" verdict as well.

I believe the reason the insanity defense is in place is to protect those that are mentally ill and commit crimes.

I do think that the insanity defense should exist- even though only 1/8th of them are successful according to our readings. What I dont like about the insanity defense is declaring someone temporarily insane. I guess I dont see how someone can momentarily be insane and commit a crime. I could see the lack of premeditation and the heat of the moment or self defense but how does that make them temporarily insane? I cannot grasp this concept at all.

Compare and contrast the due process model and the crime prevention model. I am looking for you to summarize the definitions provided in the textbook by paraphrasing (not quoting). Which model is practiced in the United States? How do you know? Explain your answer. Do you think the United States should adopt a different model? Explain your answer.

The crime control or prevention model is about identifying factual guilt, and the due process model is about identifying legal guilt. The example used in the book mentioned that a man stole a womans purse and the officer witnessed the event and chased him down and caught him. From that point the man confessed to committing the crime. This would be considered factual guilt- the officer witnessed it and the man confessed. All the facts are pointing to yes, that the man in fact was guilty of said crime. However, with due process model he was not "legally



References: criminal.findlaw.com http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/the-insanity-defense-among-the-states.html Reichel, Philip Comparative Criminal Justice Systems;chapter 3

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Hillside Strangler

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case was about Kenneth having strangled and killed various women over a period of five months from 1977 to 1978. When he was finally caught he had acted as he did nothing wrong and that he wasn’t aware of his actions. This would be the start of a defense that he will try to use to manipulate the courts into believing that he wasn’t aware of his actions. In the court case many tests are being ran on Kenneth to see if any correlation of insanity isn’t persistent with his personality. The MMPI-2 is a test that is used in courts that use it to draw out rare symptoms, symptom severity; the obvious and subtle symptoms of insanity (Rogers, 2003) with these methods psychologists would use this while observing the person being treated as insane. When a symptom doesn’t follow up with its disorder than the person is lying about their defense in trying to not be competent for trial. The…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two models of crime that have been conflicting each other for years are the due process model and the crime control model. The due process model is the belief that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. Any person that is charged with a crime is required to have their rights protected by the criminal justice system under the due process model. The crime control model for law enforcement is based on the assumption of absolute reliability of police fact-finding, treats arrestees as if they are already found guilty. (Packer, 1968)…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The due process models wants to guarantee that each individual is protected under the 4th amendment and 8th amendment, which include no illegal search and seizure, the right to a speedy fair and public trial, self incrimination and unusual punishment. As to the crime control model all it wants to do is to deter crime by all means, is less protective of individual rights, believing that individual rights must be put aside for the purpose of maintaining public safety and criminal justice manners, meaning that sometimes one has to give up ones rights for the benefit of society as a whole.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Due Process Model emphasizes the adversary system. The Due Process model also puts on emphasis on the rights of the person or people who are being accused of a crime. The Due Process model consists of many factors but a few are the idea of aggressive police enforcement, equitable and fair-minded judicial process, and imposition of proper and reasonable punishment. The main idea encompassing the model of Due Process is to make sure that people who are innocent are not being wrongly convicted or targeted. The Due process Model suggests that society and the judicial process should engage in considerable efforts to protect those who may be wrongly accused. It is important to keep in mind that there is the argument that the due process model focuses more upon the rights of the accused instead of the rights of victims.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cjs 200

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The crime control model and due process model are from my understanding of our reading materials this week a safety net of sorts. I say this because one protects the innocent from the criminals, while the other one protects the criminals from the system. In theory this makes sure that if you have done something wrong you will have to face up to it, while causing as little harm as possible to the innocents involved. It also was put in place to ensure that you are not punished to harshly for a crime that is committed. For instance you would not use lethal injection for someone Jay walking. These two processes are in place to make sure that doesn’t happen, and that we have to be able to prove you were jay walking in the first place in order to convict you. We do this in hopes of not putting innocents in our jail systems.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crimianl Procedure Policy

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due Process and Crime Control models reflect the law differently by its beliefs and procedural process. Due Process was designed mainly to ensure the defendant’s constitutional rights under the Constitution of the United States of America. Crime Control model leans more toward the victims of the crimes versus the offender. Such model is asserted to ensure that offenders are punishing, and the victims are afforded vindication. Nevertheless, both the Due Process and Crime Control model reflects different sides of the law and its purposes in the criminal justice system.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main fault of the crime control model is that it places too much emphasis on controlling crime. By doing this an individual’s constitutional rights are most often infringed upon. The due process model places its emphasis on the individual’s rights. Both the offender and the victim have constitutional rights and those rights should be protected. While the due process model is the basis for our Criminal Justice system it is not infallible. Many complain that is places too much emphasis on individual liberties and instead protects the offender and ignores the victim. (Perron, n.d., para. 3)…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process Model 1

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two models of crime with the aim of contrasting each other for decades are the crime control model and due process model. The due process model is the attitude that a person cannot be stripped of life, property or liberty without suitable legal processes and precautions. Any individual that is appointed with a crime is demanded to have their civil rights confined by the criminal justice organization below the due process model. The crime control model for rule enforcement is founded on the statement of complete dependability of police fact-finding, covers arrestees as if they are already originate responsible. (Johnson, 2002).…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime Control Model Paper

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The criminal justice system in the United State has traditionally operated under two fundamentally different theories. One theory is the Crime Control Model. This theory is characterized by the idea that criminal should be aggressively pursued and crime aggressively punished. The other theory is the Due process Model. This theory is characterized by the idea that the rights of the accused need to be carefully protected in any criminal justice investigation.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herbert Packer a professor from Stanford University came up with two models of how the criminal justice system works. The two models that Herbert Packer had came up with is the crime control model and due process model.The crime control model is based on conservative values such as aggressive arrest, prosecution and conviction of criminals and makes the system more efficient and safer for people. The due process control is basically protecting an individual’s rights whether they’re accused and to protect the innocent people from conviction.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind over Matter

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: American Psychological Association (1984). United States vs. Lyons 706 F. 2d 321, retrieve http:www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/lyons.aspx American Psychological Association (2007). Insanity Defense Position Statements, retrieve http://www.apa.org/Department/EDU/Library/APAOficialDocumentsandRelated/Posi American Law Institute (1985). Model Penal Code and Commentaries Hermann, H. D. (1997). Mental Health and Disability Law, West Group. Taber 's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary 20 th Edition (2001) U. S Code, Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedures, Part I: Crimes, Chapter I; General Provision. U. S. House of Representatives, 2001. Retrieve from http://www.uscode.hose.gov/title18. Html A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 2 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 3 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 4 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 5 A MATTER OVER MIND ARTICLE 6…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity law is any kind of change to the judicial system based on the defendant’s mental state. There have been many various legal tests over the years, all of which have been criticised. Most judicial systems base it off the case of Daniel M’Naghten. “In M’Naghten’s Case (1843) the English judges held that “to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused as labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.” Some U.S. courts went further and also relieved from responsibility one moved by an “irresistible impulse””(Norton). Still these measures aren’t enough. In Mack v. Western Australia a defendant with autism was convicted of murder on the circumstantial evidence. This man was unable to properly understand what was happening and didn’t go with a plea deal to lower his sentence. This shows that judicial systems are ill prepared to deal with autistic defendants or any defendant of any mental health…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminal defense is such an important part of the trial process. The defense is important because it can help the attorney’s client to get little to almost no time in jail or prison. The most important but also difficult part of the process is figuring out what defense to use and what defense not to use. Out of the many defenses that are used, only one stands out: the insanity defense.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I had to choose between the crime control model and the due process model, I would choose the due process model. While the crime control focuses more on the victims’ rights, the due process model is based on the constitution. The due process model allows defendants to have a fair trial assuming that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. The crime control method is a bit unconstitutional in that it forces the criminal justice system to prove a defendant’s innocence and assumes them to be guilty before looking at the facts of the case.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays