Preview

Crimes In Agatha Christie's And Then There Were None

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crimes In Agatha Christie's And Then There Were None
In the real world, not all crimes can be justified legally. In terms of whether someone believes in karma, people get away with wrongdoings everyday. In the novel, And Then There were None, it opens up with all of the main characters travelling by train or car to a ferry that will take them to a mysterious island named Soldier Island. Each guest has received an invitation from a Mr. and Mrs. U.N. Owen to come to the island. Reasons why they were invited differentiate between the characters. All characters soon later find out the real reason why they were invited onto the island. The real reason; to be murdered for the crimes they have committed. Finding out who is the killer is the mystery of the novel. Whether one character looks like the …show more content…
It just so happens to be Justice Wargrave. While reading the book, for one to not suspect Wargrave to be the murderer is completely reasonable. Why would anyone suspect a judge who believes in justice and in upholding the law to the fullest to be the killer? It is how Mr. Wargrave is portrayed during the novel that draws less attention to him to be the killer in this mystery. During the record play, Justice is convicted of murdering a man during court. Justice Wargrave finds the defendant Edward Seton to be guilty while the whole jury finds him innocent. It is later proven that Mr. Seton was indeed guilty and Mr.Wargrave was correct. Even if Edward Seton was innocent, Mr. Wargrave was just doing his job and in fact find justice rightly convict the man for the crime he has committed. From a listening perspective, this possibly eliminates Justice from ever committing any crime in the first place and puts him in a position that makes him less likely to be the killer. Even after the record stops playing, Justice Wargrave acts completely calm and doesn't have an immediate reaction like the others. Christie describes to the reader that the judge sat in his habitual pose, his head sunk down into his neck. With one hand he gently scratched his ear. Only his eyes were active, darting round and round the room, puzzled, alert with intelligence (Christie 61). This information presents Wargrave to be slightly innocent for the time being which is meant to through the reader off. Christie unveils Wargrave in a way to not seem like the killer to have the novel remain a mystery. Besides knowing he's the killer, Justice Wargrave puts on a act by trying to distinguish who is the killer. From the beginning of the novel, Wargrave seems to take control on the situation and often asks question to the rest of the group to try and convict who exactly is the murderer. Others notice the role he has given himself in being the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In chapter four Justice Wargrave, who is accused of the murder of Edward Seton, says that Seton was a murderer who he had passed his sentence on. Vera who is accused of the murder of Cyril Hamilton, tells everyone that she was his nursery governess, and he drowned because he swam out too far. General Macarthur, who is accused of the murder of Arthur Richmond, tell everyone that Richmond was one of his officer who was killed on a reconnaissance. Macarthur also states that his wife did not have an affair. Lombard who is accused of killing the members of an East African tribe, admits to everyone he stole their food to save himself.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because Miss Climpson believes that there is reasonable doubt the jury is hung. Similar to the American court system the jury must all unanimously agree guilty or not guilty. To the judges credit he obeys English law and decides to give Vane a fresh trial. Even after trying to provoke a unanimous decision. “Do you think that with a little bit more time you may be able to reach an agreement” (Sayers 35). At this time the judge persistently tries to get the jury to agree and even seems to be looking for every loophole he can get to just get the jury to agree. “We quite understand the evidence, but we cannot agree about it” (Sayers 35). The foreman replies to the judge saying he appreciates it him trying to help the jury with something, but the jury has already voted and they cannot agree on the murder case. I don’t know if it has more to do with the fact that the judge wanted the trial to be over already or if he strongly believed that Vane was…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1903 the late Mrs. Annie Johnson of Arkansas found herself with two toddling sons, very little money, a slight ability to read and add simple numbers. To this picture add a disastrous marriage and the burdensome fact that Mrs. Johnson was a Negro. When she told her husband, Mr. William Johnson, of her dissatisfaction with their marriage, he conceded that he too found it to be less than he expected, and had been secretly hoping to leave and study religion. He added that he thought God was calling him not only to preach but to do so in Enid, Oklahoma. He did not tell her that he knew a minister in Enid with whom he could study and who had a friendly, unmarried daughter. They parted amicably, Annie keeping the one-room house and William taking most of the cash to carry himself to Oklahoma.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Myra Hindley's Murders

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page

    Myra Hindley, a serial killer in England, murdered several children with the help of her boyfriend Ian Brady. Along with Ian Brady, she committed the rapes and murders of five small children. At the age of nineteen she met Ian Brady, a stock clerk who was recently released from prison. She fell in love with him and soon became under his control. She became the willing accomplish to Brady’s horrific crimes of rape and murder. Hindley's 17-year-old brother-in-law tipped her off the police about her crimes. During their 1966 trial, both Hindley and Ian Brady pleaded not guilty to the murders of four victims, Edward Evans, Lesley Ann Downey, and John Kilbride. Hindley plead not guilty to all five of the murders. She was only found guilty of three…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Estevan is correct, we as American's do believe that bad things happen to bad people. Those people had to of done something bad for them to have…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 8th Juror is a key character throughout the play. He is the only dissenter who votes ‘not guilty’ in the very beginning and says ‘it’s not easy to raise hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.’ As a logical, gentle and thoughtful character, the 8th Juror slowly works out the way to make the jury rethink the case and the possibility of the boy not killing his…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since Judge Lawrence Wargrave was a child he had a thing for seeing and causing death. He had a tormented mind. He himself could not kill the innocent for that was his tragic flaw. So he found a loophole and wanted to kill the guilty, but were the people on the island were really guild of the same crime. If they were wouldn't they have been in jail or giving the death penalty. That is not at all the way Wargrave saw it he had seen people get away with murder and they deserved to die, but he was wrong. He made a…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And Then There Were None

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the book And Then There Were None, ten characters are invited to an island by an anonymous host. At the Island, there is a poem that tells a story about ten Indian boys who all die in unique ways. Coincidentally, there are ten figurines that are designed as Indian boys on a plate on the dinner table inside the only house on the island, a mansion. As the story progresses, the characters find out everyone who was invited to the island had committed murder but avoided the consequences by finding a loophole in the law. Determining to grant the victims of the guests’ acts the justice they deserve, the unidentified Mr. U. N. Owen commits murders of his own, killing each guest in correspondence with the Indian poem. Using mystery and murder, Agatha…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Delusion of Satan

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While on trial, the judge Hawthorne new in his mind and heart that they were guilty. Their trial…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The short story Trifles written by Susan Glaspell is a story regarding the investigation of the murder of John Wright by his wife, Mrs. Wright. Mrs. Hale is the wife of Mr. Hale, one of the men investigating the murder, and the neighbor of the Wrights. While the men investigate around the farmhouse looking for clues to prove Mrs. Wright was guilty, Mrs. Hale is downstairs with Mrs. Peters discovering their own evidence in the mishaps of Mrs. Wrights cleaning and sewing. Mrs. Hale begins to reminisce on how cheerful and full of life Mrs. Wright was prior to her marriage. She regrets not visiting with Mrs. Wright throughout the years especially since they were neighbors. Upon finding the unfinished quilt and the empty bird cage, they discover a dead canary with a strangled neck, the same way Mr. Wright’s neck was strangled. She begins to see the reasoning for Mrs. Wright murdering her husband. She concludes that Mrs. Wright was unhappy with her marriage and possibly neglected. She decides to keep this information between her and Mrs. Peters instead of informing the men of their findings. Why would Mrs. Hale’s change in view of Mrs. Wright make her justify the reasoning behind why she murdered her husband?…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jason. "Guilty" in this context refers to the person who is responsible for the tragedy of four deaths.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lastly, Judge Hathorne is responsible for the hanging of innocent people. This judge often rejected logical fact, devised tricky scenarios, and refused to hear testimony that would prove the innocence of many who were accused of this nonsense. Some of the people clung to their pride, refusing to falsely admit to their convictions, so that their reputations wouldn't be put to shame.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Fallacies

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    » to his father and that the old man who testified in court, saw the boy running down the stairs and that he heard the body fall. Through critical thought and analysing the evidence piece by piece, it was pointed out that, since the murder took place during the passing of a train, the old man could not have possibly heard the body fall and that it took him too long to cross his room and open the door for him to have seen the boy after committing the murder. Still juror number three voted guilty saying he had no reasonable doubt that «the boy said ‘I’m going to kill you’ and he killed him» at this point he was using circular reasoning, restating his claim as a…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays