Preview

Crime defined the moral and behavioral standard of the society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crime defined the moral and behavioral standard of the society
In a society, crime is inevitable. Crime has its effect to the society’s moral and behavioral standard because it distinguishes the line between right and wrong. Since the society transform from an agricultural and domestic to a modern society, more people are educated. This transformation created different classes in a society, upper class, middle class and lower class. Karl Marx suggested that capitalism inherent a class system in which class relations are characterized by conflict. Although owners of capital and workers are dependent on the other – the capitalists require labours to produce products; where workers need wages from the owners– the dependency is highly unbalanced (Giddens, 2009). Therefore, workers have been living under this unequal condition, and when the workers reach their limit of tolerance, they seek money through illegal ways, which results in crime. If someone breaks the stable patterns of the society, it becomes a crime.
Crime is defined by norms that are formalized in law, for example murder, burglary or arson. In Emile Durkheim’s view, the understanding of people common values in society, uniting a multitude of separate individuals (Giddens, 2009). That is how the moral and behavioral standard gives a guideline of the society. When crimes happen, more rules are added and change the standard of society’s moral and behavior.
Moral is divided into two parts, personal moral and social moral. There is a fundamental difference between personal morality and social morality. Personal morality (Karl, 2007) defines how people respond to life from or within our own integrity with personal values. Social morality defines the respond of situated environment, our immediate community and the world community. Human behaviors are guided by their own sense of values. As everyone in society must follow the moral and behavior standard decided by the society, crime is the deviance issue that society does not agree. For example, robbing, murder, terrorism

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Durkheim looks at how crime and deviance is inevitable and needed in society as it performs two important positive functions: boundary maintenance and adaptation and change, he says that boundary maintenance is when society reacts to crime and there is social cohesion, and this leads to society condemning the criminal and the punishment given by the social agencies is a way of reaffirming societies shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. The media portrays the court case and the punishment; this acts a way of informing members of society and discourages others from rule breaking. Adaptation and change for Durkheim is when an individual has an idea or belief which is seen to be deviant by rest of the members of society, they fight and challenge the existing norms and values, in time there values may give way to a new culture and morality and not seen as deviant anymore such as cohabiting couples would be seen as deviant due to the couples not been married but in current times it is not deviant as it is more popular in society. These changes in values and in society allow society to progress and evolve. Furthermore Durkheim acknowledges that crime and deviance are inevitable because not everyone is socialized in the same way with the same norms and values. Functionalism is useful as it…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way in which Marxism is a useful theory for explaining the causes of crime is the concept of capitalism, criminogenic capitalism. Criminogenic capitalism is based on the exploitation of the working class- using them for a means to an end. Crime is not confined to the working class, greed and self interest cause white collar crimes such as tax evasion and breaches of the health and safety laws. An example to highlight this can be seen from Gordon 1988 who studied the response to the anti capitalist system and found that it is apparent that it can be found in all social classes. This analysis shows that Marxism is useful to a large extent.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Finally, major crimes occur in our society. Pick a current event (local or national) and describe the crime. Analyze the crime in terms of Durkheim’s four major functions of deviance.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim believes that crime is normal, and argues there are at least two reasons why crime and deviance are found in all societies: not everyone is equally effectively socialised into the shared norms and values, so some individuals will be prone to deviate, and particularly in modern societies, there is a diversity of lifestyles and values Different groups develop their own subcultures with distinctive norms and values, and what the members of the subculture regard as normal, mainstream culture may seem as deviant.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the University of Phoenix CJi Interactive activities (2014), the definition of a crime is “a conduct in violation of the criminal laws of the state, the federal government, or a local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse”. It is a complex and very difficult definition to agree upon because there are many points of view and controversies in defining what crime is. From a psychological standpoint, it suggest that the crime is a way of expressing the inability of an individual to follow the social norm. The psychological view…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all crime is a moral wrong that confers upon society a duty to punish and to set up institutions to facilitate punishment. The punishment, which must match the crime, is an ipso facto (by its very nature) moral good.…

    • 388 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Marxists crime is bound to happen in a capitalist society, and the reason behind this is because capitalism is ‘criminogenic’, meaning capitalism itself causes crime. Marxists explain that capitalism is based on the oppression of the working class; they argue that the ruling class use them as a way to make profit which is damaging on the working class. Marxists explain this causes crime as poverty may mean crime is the only way the working class can survive and crime may also be the only way they can obtain the consumer goods encouraged by capitalist advertising, resulting in theft and other utilitarian crimes. However Marxists note that not only working class people commit crime, Gordon (1976) argues that crime is a rational response to capitalism found in all social classes Capitalism is a ‘dog-eat-dog’ system of fierce competition among capitalist competing with each other for profit, encouraging them to commit white-collar crime and corporate crimes such as tax evasion. However the usefulness of this Marxist explanation of crime has been criticised as not all capitalist societies have high crime rates, for example Japan & Switzerland have a much lower crime level than the USA.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although Durkheim’s theory is valid, some criticisms are found. He proposed that crime promotes solidarity; however, this is not always the case, as sometimes crime can have the opposite effect. For example; state crime. Durkheim also believed that crime is functional for society as a whole; however, crime might not be functional to everyone. For example, the victim himself. Durkheim proposed that a certain amount of deviance in society is beneficial, but too much is damaging, however, he never indicated how much is enough. The main criticism is that Durkheim never explained…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Traditional Marxists explain crime as inevitable in capitalism, because capitalism is criminogenic and its very nature causes crime. They argue that crime is mostly found in working-classes because of capitalism and how it exploits people; for many people living in poverty crime is the only way for them to survive, crime for some could be the only way for them to acquire consumer goods, which capitalism advertises as essentials and alienation is often a result of capitalism, which often leads to frustration and aggression, consequently causing non-utilitarian crimes, such as violence. However traditional Marxists ignore the fact that not all capitalist societies have a high crime rate, for example Japan has much less crime than America.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ttraditional Marxists see crime as inevitable in capitalist society because it breeds poverty, ccompetition and greed. All classes commit crime, but because the ruling class control the state, they make and enforce laws in their own interests, criminalising the working class while escaping punishment for their corporate crimes. Traditional Marxism is criticised for ignoring non-class inequalities that affect crime and for determinism whereas neo-Marxism is less deterministic and sees crime as a conscious and meaningful choice with a political move- a rebellion against capitalism.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Constructionism

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will begin by defining key terms Jewkes (2012) defines Crime as the violation of law, however it has been extended to include social harm, which is culturally relative and ultimately depends on theoretical position of those defining it. Jewkes also defines Deviance, as a social and usually moral (as opposed to legal) concept to describe rule breaking behaviour.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Macrosociological crime theory examines how the organization or structure of a society can generate an environment conducive to crime (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 69). Furthermore, Emile Durkheim rejected the notion that crime can be explained by an individual’s biological or psychological factors, and he theorized that crime was a normal occurrence in society, which he labeled as a social fact (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Therefore, Durkheim influenced macrosociological theory by providing insight on the overall aspects of society and crime beginning with social facts.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society crime does more than expose the weakness in social relationships it undermines the social order itself by destroying assumptions on which it is based (Schnalleger, Chapter 1 what is criminal justice, 2011). Society has many different definitions of crime. The text states that crime is conduct in violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government or, local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse (Schnalleger, Chapter what is criminal justice, 2011). There are many models of how society determines which act are criminal, but the two most common are consensus…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviance In Sociology

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Durkheim explains that crime in society display to people the difference between right and wrong, and what acts are breaking social-norms. Durkheim also stated that crime encourage group against group, in other words, the good against the bad. As an example in terrorist attacks, the crime of terrorism separates society from the good individuals against the bad people (terrorists) which also has an effect in having them punished and looked down upon. Another theory Durkheim has explained is the fact of being deviant and going against society to reach out for a change, this may be things such as protests. Durkheim has also said that minor law breaking and being deviant every now and then in our lives reduces stress and anger and helps us to lead better and healthier lives. Durkheim is not saying that crime is good, but rather that is serves good in society. Durkheim’s theory is somewhat about a normative theory but mainly it comes from the labeling perspective. The normative theory applies in the way that the social norms provide a guide for what is normal in society and how individuals should act, and why they get broken in society. The labeling perspective is what helps the society regarding crime; the labeling perspective focuses on the social audience and how they react to the crime. Many of Durkheim’s theories relate exactly to this, how crime shows…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics