Preview

Creationism Vs. Evolution Argument

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Creationism Vs. Evolution Argument
Evolution vs Creationism A main point in the Creationism vs Evolution argument is about the Bible and science, religion and science. Between the Bible and science, most scientists who believe in evolution are atheist. In order for atheism to be true, there must be an explanation for how the universe and life came into existence. “Atheism is not an affirmative belief that there is no god nor does it answer any other question about what a person believes. It is simply a rejection of the assertion that there are gods. Atheism is too often defined incorrectly as a belief system. To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.” (“American Atheists”)
Scientists who believe in evolution will
…show more content…
They are corrupt, and their actions are evil; not one of them does good” (Psalms 14:1).
“For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God” (Romans 1:20).
According to the Bible, the one who denies the existence of God is a fool, but why do so many people, including Christians, accept evolutionist’s beliefs. According to the Bible, they are all foolish people. Foolishness does not mean lack of intelligence. Most scientists who believe in evolution are intelligent people. Folly refers to the inability to apply knowledge appropriately. “Fear of the Lord is the foundation of true knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline” (Proverbs
…show more content…
Evolutionists scoff at creationists and claim that says intelligent design are not worth doing non-scientific, scientific reviews. According to their assertion, in order for something to be regarded as 'science', it must be observed and verifiable. In other words, it must be "realistic."
Creation is by definition supernatural. God and the supernatural can not be observed or verified; therefore, creation and intelligent design can not be regarded as science. Of course, evolution can not be observed and verified, but it seems to be an issue for evolutionists. As a result, evolutionists filter evolutionary preconceptions and assumptions, with previously accepted theories without considering any other explanation for all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Lie: Evolution by Ken Ham is an informational book on the lies and corruption that evolution brings into society. A side purpose of this book is to encourage the reader to use Genesis as the foundation for defending your faith in Creation and God. The chapters summarized in this paper are the first six and the eighth.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people believe that only science is correct. There is no evidence of the seven days of creation except by word, whereas all theories of evolution and the Big Bang have a large amount of evidence, and hundreds of hours of research dedicated to them. Evolution and the Big Bang have explanations for and biological reasons, whereas why would a God suddenly decide to make a universe and planet for living organisms?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intelligent design supporters have several opinions about evolution and their own theory. The opinions that are most commonly understood are the ones put forth by Thomas More Law and the Discovery Institute during the Dover trial. This trial focused on why intelligent design should be taught in classrooms. Evolution in the context of the trial and as declared by Charles Darwin is best described as the slow gradual genetic change of a population over time. The major underlying argument for intelligent design supporters is that the features of all organisms are too complex to have been simply caused by evolution (Koch). Since these features are too complex, supporters believe that there must have been a designer. They agree with evolution in some instances however. For example,…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jw Apps Claim

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A good example of this is the big question of how the earth and humans were created. According to Christians, the existence of us today is completely from God’s creation. However, if we discuss this with many scientists, you would altogether get a different viewpoint as they would most likely disagree with the Christian’s belief. This is because they have their own belief that we humans were created through evolution.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main scientific theories that opposes Creation story’s is Evolution a theory that was discovered by Charles Darwin. It shows that living things evolve and adapt to their environment over millions of years so that they can survive. This strongly opposes Creation story's as Most creation story’s depict god making everything whilst Darwin shows us evolving from apes.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the years we have seen the evolution of science and how it was grown to be what is considered science today. In all that growth, there have always been controversial aspects of science, which are still disputed today. One large controversy that still stands today is the theory of evolution is the idea of religion and the story of creation. These two concepts can be either seen as two opposing sides or two separate entities that have nothing to do with the other. Either way, the theory of evolution and religion have yet to see eye to eye. With every controversy there will be people standing on both ends of the spectrum. On the side of evolution with no belief in religion or God is Richard Dawkins. On the other end of the spectrum are people who take the literal interpretation of the bible. There are also some people who believe in a combination of religion and evolution, Stephen Gould. Over the years, people gave gained popularity for their ideas within the field of science and religion.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas and Paley both argue that nature is too complex and orderly and has in-built goals- which are inexplicable. They infer that there must be an intelligent designer- God. But thanks to Darwin, evolution provides an alternative explanation for the ordered, complexity and purpose of our world and the universe. There is a perfectly explicable natural process at work, which clearly explains the complexity, variety and apparent design of the living world. If taking Darwin’s theory, plants and animals have evolved step by step without the need for a designer. Neither purpose nor design is implicit in…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Dawkins Evolution

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins once said, “Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.” What needs to be understood today is that many Christians have put on blinders to the world and the only answer they have for such proponents of evolution such as Mr. Dawkins is their faith and their faith alone. While faith is very important to the Christian it is also necessary that they are able to defend that same faith. The reason that you must be able to defend your faith is that Mr. Dawkins also stated, “I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.” Christians must be prepared to respond to such statements with confidence and the only way to…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    God created all things as detailed in Genesis 1:1,” In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.”(ESV Bible, 2015). God not only created the Earth but He sustains it each and every day. We were created to be in a relationship with God until sin destroyed Adam and Eve’s direct walk in the Garden of Eden. From this point on God as working to bring his children back from sin to enjoy a complete relationship with Him. As a citizen of this world, I have experienced many different cultural practices and beliefs that are different from my own. In this way, I have been pushed out of my box known as cultural pluralism and have found many beautiful new ways to see God. No matter if my peers started their life in India, Canada, or the Philippines, the one constant is the belief that God is…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doubting Darwin

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many of the scientist that believe evolution is the way we came to be think that Intelligent design is an assault on the basic principle of enlightenment, that science must explain nature through natural causes. Vic Walczak said “Intelligent design is predicated on a supernatural creator. That’s not science, its religion”.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Young Earth

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many scientists and creationist are Bible believing Christian like Isaac Newton, Edward Blyth, Kurt Wise, and Inn Taylor who is the president of creation research Family Radio, Oakland, CA and host of others who believe in a literal Genesis as the word of God which is accurate and without any error, also agreed with Genesis that God created the heaven and the earth in 6 days, 24 hours and no other wise like millions or billions as evolutionist perceived. The Bible is the truth word of God. “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.” 2 The web site www.answersingenesis.org explained many questions and misconception that one may have about Genesis…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the years have past, advancements in engineering and science have improved people’s lives dramatically. The result of this has placed an emphasis on the thought that science can never be wrong and that we all should blindly accept what the majority of the scientific community says. This includes the theory of evolution. Sadly, “Christians” are becoming more and more accepting of this belief. Theistic evolution is rapidly becoming a widely accepted idea in Christian circles. It is even being taught in many seminaries now, but I believe it should not be accepted by the born again Child of God because first it contains many of the same holes and inconsistencies as atheistic evolution, but lastly it requires someone to make severe compromises to Gods Word in order to believe it.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every fossil that has ever been excavated has been helped document the fossil record. All fossils are the remains of living organisms that have been imbedded in sediment. The fossil record can provide a glimpse into the conditions and controversial processes of the past. The Intelligent Design theory is backed by the findings and evidence of paleontology. Charles Darwin thought that all living things were descended from one organism. He thought that as time went by, different species would evolve into others. So, if evolution were true, one would expect the fossil record to be filled with organisms that were in the “inbetween” stages(Buratovich). The fossil record should document the evolution of the species. But, there are no fossils like this that have been found. Instead, all of the fossils that have been excavated are from one species and one species only(Dembski, Wells). Darwinists try and validate their reasoning by noting the similarities between organisms. Instead of a common predecessor, could all life have a common creator? The fossil record clearly does not support the idea of evolution because the documentation of the actual species changing is not evident.(Buratovich). The evidence points rather to a common intelligent designer who created a variety of species from the beginning of time. Some scientists have tried to submit the idea of Punctuated Equilibrium. This is the idea that instead of the more popular idea that evolution is slow and steady, evolution actually happens in short spurts of time.(Dembski, Wells) This, it would seem, would bridge many of the gaps in the evolutionary fossil record. The species would evolve so fast that nature would not have time to fossilize the “inbetween” stages of the change. Still, the changes could not happen in one generation of species. Even if this theory happened to be true, there still should be some fossils…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays