Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Courtroom Participation Paper

Better Essays
1401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Participation Paper
Courtroom Participation Paper

Courtroom Participation One of the core components to the criminal justice system is the judicial system. The judicial system consists of participants who have specialized roles that are associated with the courtroom. There are 10 basic roles that the participants play which include; judge, prosecutor, defense counsel, bailiff, court reporter, clerk of the court, witness, jury, defendant, and spectators. The judge has the ultimate authority in the courtroom, and is used to protect both the rights of the accused, and the best interest of the public. Courtroom participation is an important aspect, and is necessary in helping to secure the rights which are protected under the United States Constitution. The courtroom work group works together, and is guided by ethical considerations, and statuatory requirements that are bound by law (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011). There are professional, and nonprofessional participants that help to make sure that everyone is guarenteed a fair, and just trial. This paper discusses the important roles that each particpant plays in the judicial system. Each member of the courtroom has duties, and responsibilities that help in the procedures that are established in court proceedings. Courtroom Participants And Their Roles The courtroom arena is equipped with different players who make up the core of the court system each player posses a different skill set and plays important roles in the preceding process. The participants in the courtroom are the prosecutor, the defense attorney, the judges, the defendant, the jury, and the victim. Each of the participants is intertwine together to resolve the decision of right and wrong. The head of the chain of participants are the judges and their main focus is to resolve any issue when it comes before the court (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011). The opposite of the judge is the jury the core of their existence is to listen to presented evidence and renders their decision based on credible evidence. The jury weighs heavily on the defendant and making sure that the defendant is held accountable for his or her actions, with the calibration of the judge and jury this cohesive glue will decide the outcome of the defendant. The prosecution and the defense attorneys are on different side of the law but work sometimes hand in hand together to find the best resolution of the law when it comes to the defendant and victim. The defense attorney makes decision when concerns the defendant making sure that the defendant knows his or her options in regards to the due process. The defense attorney acts for the defendant the defense attorney is a very specialized participate of the law, they are skilled in litigation and must know all facets of the law (Siegel, Schmalleger & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011). Each participate in the courtroom lends themselves hand and hand and every piece is needed to resolve any issues when it comes to the courtroom process. Courtroom Major Participants’ Duties And Responsibilities Judges are often described as triers of law (or finders of law), meaning that they are generally tasked with resolving any legal matter that comes before the court. For example, if one of the attorneys in a civil case goes too far in questioning a particular witness, such as by leading the person in a particular direction, the judge will make a ruling on the propriety of such action if the opposing party objects; in other words, the judge will determine whether the questioning can proceed. His or her decision will amount to applying the law, either as spelled out in statutes or as interpreted by other courts’ decisions. In some cases, judges serve as triers of law and fact (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011).

Defense attorneys perform essentially the same task—helping criminal defendants navigate the sometimes rough waters of the justice process. The defense attorney serves “as the accused’s counselor and advocate with courage and devotion to render effective, quality representation.” Good defense attorneys’ helping function is multifaceted:

• “They formulate sentencing programs tailored to a client’s specific needs, often helping defendants avoid future brushes with the justice system. • They are familiar with important legal rules because many criminal laws are hidden away in court interpretations of federal and state constitutions. • They spend crucial time on a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011). Prosecutors in America are also somewhat unique in the sense of prosecution because they perform a range of functions. The usual functions are representing the government in court, executing the law, and upholding the federal and state constitutions, but prosecutors can also influence law enforcement activity as a result of their screening function. They can alter both the quality and nature of law enforcement investigations by deciding not to press charges against offenders; for example, if a prosecutor continually rejects a particular type of case, this may send a message to the police that enforcement of the underlying crime is not important (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, Chapter 7, 2011).

Courtroom participants’ selection process

With court cases, there are always key figures to ensure that a trial goes smoothly. Some are present more than others; however, each has a key responsibility in court proceedings. The major key players include the judge, the court reporter, the bailiff, the defendant or offender, the defense attorney, the prosecutor, the jury, the victim, and witnesses. In lower courts, judges are either selected or suggested by a politician of the state in which the judge will serve. Federal court judges are appointed by the President of the United States. The judge has a very important role in court proceedings, as they allow both parties to present their facts associated with the case and overseas all aspects of the trail. The court reporter and bailiffs are simply employed based on employment qualifications, but they assist the judge during trails. The court reporter records all the proceedings during the case. Bailiffs maintain order in the courtroom and supervise the jury if one is present. A jury is “a statutorily defined number of persons selected according to law and sworn to determine, in accordance with the law as instructed by the court, certain matters of fact based on evidence presented in a trial, and to render a verdict” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, p. 344 – 345). The jury is randomly selected within the jurisdiction of where they are summoned to serve. All United States citizens that are 18 years of age and older are eligible to become members of a jury or summons to jury duty. If a jury is elected, they play a major role in court proceedings. Members of a jury are there to hear the facts and see the evidence of a case, and make a determination of guilt or innocence in connection of the charges of the defendant. Prosecutors are often chosen through elections, and they are there to represent the “people” or the victims. The defense attorneys are either in private practice or employed by the city, county, or state to represent the defendant. They are there to ensure that the rights of the accused are maintained and to defend the accused. The defendant, victim, and witnesses are parties due to the circumstances. These key players are the entire reason the court proceedings are in process.

In conclusion, as you have read the roles of each member in the courtroom workgroup is an important aspect to the judicial system. The way that members are selected helps to ensure that the rights of individuals, and the society are protected. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused has the right to a speedy, and public trial (“Sixth Amendment”, n.d.). Through the rights established under the Constitution, each memeber of the courtroom workgroup helps to adhere to these laws. Under the guidance of the proceeding judge, the courtroom, and their participants work together to to make sure that in all these criminal prosecutions are handled in a fair manor. The criminal justice system through court proceedings is an important facet to due process. From the role of the judge to the role of the spectators all members are vital in securing the saftey, and well being of individuals within the court system.

References
Siegel, L., Schmalleger, F., and Worrall, J.(2011). Courts and Criminal Justice in America (1st edition). Pearson.
Sixth Amendment. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/sixth_amendment

References: Siegel, L., Schmalleger, F., and Worrall, J.(2011). Courts and Criminal Justice in America (1st edition). Pearson. Sixth Amendment. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/sixth_amendment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2010). Criminal Law Today: An introduction with…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper was prepared for Introduction to Justice Administration, Homework Assignment #1 taught by Professor Dauser.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Foreman: The Foreman is responsible for keeping the jury organized. He seems calm and neutral in the way that he does not object or counter anyone’s opinions.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American Criminal Justice System is a well orchestrated and cooperative performance with the professional courtroom actors and others all playing their parts in the administration of justice. This paper will look at a very important group of individuals the courtroom work group. Each person acts as one of the cogs in the machine, all cooperating to reach a common goal. This paper will describe what a courtroom work group is, who is in a courtroom work group and what they each do. The role of the prosecutor will also be described and how they determine which cases to pursue, and what would happen if the criteria for the prosecution of cases were more lenient or stringent. Lastly, this paper will describe the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the American court systems and the courtroom work group. Are there any solutions to help eliminate the funnel and help reduce the backlog of cases? To get an answer to that question, a review of the how this important group works will have to be understood.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    County Courts Case Study

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the textbook, there is a hierarchy of courts in the judiciary system. All the courts share certain functions, however they also vary in their responsibilities.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neubauer, D.W. (2004). America 's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Published by Thomson Wadsworth Criminal courts/ United States…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Players

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the United States criminal justice system, a courtroom work group is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. This is a foundational concept in the academic discipline of the criminal justice system. Everyone in the courtroom group tries to get along. Often they act as if they are good friends. Although the members of the court group are against each other, at the end of the day justice is being served in the courtroom regardless of the gender, race, or national origin. The role of the prosecutor is to represent the government and prove the defendant is guilty of the crime. Prosecutors participate in, jury selection; opening statements, direct examination, cross-examination, and closing arguments. The prosecutor also makes sure that the jurors can be fair as well. Prosecutors are able to determine which cases to work by confirming if perhaps the case has merit, and sufficient evidence to purse a conviction. If the criteria for taking a case were more or less stringent, it would make the police officers job a lot harder by having to go more in depth then what they have to go through nowadays, and this is due to the prosecutor having to prove even more evidence beyond a reasonable doubt in court. Nonetheless, if the criteria for taking of a case were less stringent I think that the officers and the prosecutors jobs would be too easy to prove if someone is guilty, and it would not give a defendant a fair trail. Perhaps the change that I would make to the courtroom work group would be that, many people believe that the courtroom work group should consider adding more security. Though out the years several cases…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Siegel, L. J., Schmalleger, F., & Worrall, J. L. (2011). Courts and Criminal Justice in America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court System Paper

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As the gavel sounds there is silence in the courtroom. The Judge has made his final decision, and the outcome is life without the possibility of parole. The courtroom is filled with mixed emotions and the prosecution and family have a sense of justice, although the family of the perpetrator feels anguish. Criminal court is perceived as the place of justice where criminals are punished and the victims get closure. This is a simplistic view of how the criminal justice system works; in reality the process is more complicated.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clerks record the verbal debates during trials; they also record the outcomes of the trials, such as the verdict of the Jury or the Judge. They also maintain the records, by organizing them and filing the away, in more recent years they digitize them into a computer database. Depending on the level of clerk, they monitor the construction of court spaces, such as courtrooms or any and all courthouse add-ons. It is their responsibility to inform jurors of the days that they are required to appear in court as well as to inform them on the proper courtroom etiquette. They also manage relations with other offices pertaining to the court system, such as the local law enforcement agency and the local seat of power, for example city hall. They undeniably manage the court system of America thus earning them the title of steward. Though all these positions are vital for the court systems success, who protects the courts attendees from those who are prone to violence when…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiction vs Reality

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Review pp. 216-35 in The Courts in Our Criminal Justice System. Identify five courtroom participants listed in the text between pp. 216-35. Then, describe each courtroom participant’s role you chose. Each response must be about 30 words in length.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an appropriate case, the court, in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction, may examine the facts of the case and decide the issue of illegality. While there is a need to uphold the public interest in ensuring the finality of arbitral awards, the court must also safeguard the countervailing public interest in ensuring that its processes are not abused by litigants. [emphasis added]…

    • 2190 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays