Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Court Visit

Good Essays
509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Visit
Following a brief investigation of the court listings for the 21st November 2013, I viewed the Court & Tribunal Services website that can be seen at the following URL,

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/_apps/courtlists/default.aspx

Upon review of the daily listings, discussions with Court personnel and review of the proceedings in progress at the time of my visit to the District Court of Western Australia (500 Hay Street, Perth 6000), I attended the following Criminal Proceedings which is Trial by Jury before the Honourable Justice Hall,

1. The State of Western Australia v. Ambrose John Clarke (INS 82/2012)
2. The State of Western Australia v. Xavier Gerard Clarke (INS 82/2012)
On entry to court-room 4.1, the following was noted. The Judge was seated at the head of the court-room on the top tier, directly under the Western Australian Coat of Arms that includes a black swan between two Kangaroos. Several monitors for evidence viewing were hanging on the walls. The next tier lower included two court clerks. From the viewpoint of the Judge, the jury box including 14 Jurors were seated to the left side of the court room under the supervision of a Jury Officer, whilst the two defendants were seated in the segregated area to the right under the supervision of a Sherriff. An additional two Sheriff’s were seated at each end of the viewing gallery situated at the rear of the court room.

The Prosecutor (x2) seated on the left side of the court room on the ground level directly in front of the jury box facing the Judge, whilst the Defendants Defense Counsel (x3) seated on the ground level directly in front of the Defendant’s area facing the Judge.

Support personnel for the Prosecutor and Defense Counsel seated directly behind respectively. Prosecutor and Defense Counsels attire included Black Robes, whilst Defendants and Witnesses wore suits.

Two brothers (Defendants) are currently on trial in the WA Supreme Court (highest Court of Western Australia) for the murder of Peter Davis, a Perth businessman. It is alleged that the cause of the murder was money that was owed in the order of $300K. Mr Peter Davis’ body was found in the boot of a car outside a Riverdale Motel in May 2011. See following link,

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/bodyinboot-murder-accused-ambrose-john-clarke-takes-stand/story-fnhocxo3-1226764771059

The high level of formality for all functions during the proceedings was noted. The manner in which documents were entered into evidence, through to transcripts created for daily proceedings was at the highest standard. All parties including the viewing gallery behaved with the highest level of respect for the judicial system.

Court documentation including secure custody and safekeeping of records including proceedings and appeals is the responsibility of The Registry (where documents are lodged and filed in the courts). The Principal Registry of the High Court of Australia is located at the seat of the Court in Canberra, whilst offices of the Registry are in capital cities of each State and Darwin. The Registrar is a senior administrative official who maintains the register or any other records.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On first arriving to the Crown Court I immediately felt a feeling of anxiety, almost as if I was about to stand trial myself. This led me to a moment of reflection on how those around me, the family of those awaiting trial and in some cases those awaiting trial themselves must be feeling. Many anxious faces sat around…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The principal piece of the trail procedure would be the first appearance. In this the litigants are brought under the steady gaze of a judge to be given forma notification of the charges against them, to be educated concerning their rights, to be given the chance to hold a legal advisor or to have one named to speak to them, and maybe to be managed the open door for safeguard. The respondent if taken into authority must be offered an in court…

    • 976 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the morning of Sunday 21st April 1996, a young Hobart man, Martin Bryant armed himself with three high powered automatic firearms and a large quantity of ammunition and then drove to Port Arthur. North of Port Arthur, he entered the home of a couple he briefly met as a child. Inside he started his rampage, shooting them both. Once he arrived at the Historical Site Port Arthur he ate a meal at the Broad Arrow Café. He then waited till his meal was finished to take his rifle from his bag and began to indiscriminately shoot around the crowded Cafe. Within the first 90 seconds, 20 people had died and 12 were injured. The man then moved to the adjacent car park, where he shot and killed four more people and added to the toll of injured people as well. After shooting at people in the grounds of the Historic Site, he maneuvered into his car and drove up the former main entrance road to the original toll booth. In this area, seven more people were killed in two separate incidents, during which he stole a victim’s car and abandoned his own. Driving north to a General Store, he killed another person and took one hostage then drove back to the place of his first killings, firing random shots at vehicles along the way. At the house, he continued to set fire to the stolen car and then took his hostage inside. Through the afternoon and night, shots were fired at police officers on the scene. At some point during this time, Bryant killed the hostage. When morning arrived, he set fire to the house and was captured by police as he fled. By the time the incidents had finished he had killed 35 people and injured 18. . Bryant had 72 criminal charges pressed against him and 551 witness statements were entered. After initially pleading “not guilty” to 72 charges, his plea was changed after conversations with his lawyer. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole on all 35 murder charges, plus 21 years for each of the remaining counts of the indictment.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ACC v Stoddart Case Note

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages

    (ACC) on 03 April 2009 following S28 (1) of the ACC Act 2002 (Cth) to provide evidence of…

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |proceedings on behalf of the people against |prosecution is very much involved in the case with |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The matter returned to Maroochydore Magistrates Court for mention on 17 May 2012. There at Maroochydore Magistrates Court, the matter was adjourned until 21 June 2012 for a further mention at Maroochydore Magistrates Court. On 21 June 2012 at Maroochydore Magistrates Court the matter was adjourned until 20 September 2012 for a further mention at Maroochydore Magistrates Court. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is prosecuting the matter (ASIC 2012).…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The prosecutor has a very important role as a member of the courtroom workgroup. The prosecutor may also be known as the district attorney, states attorney, or the commonwealth attorney (Schmalleger, 2011). The prosecutor is responsible for making and presenting the case of the state against the accused. In their own way the prosecutor speaks on behalf of the people, for the law or laws broken by the defendant. The…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During trial there are ten basic roles associated with the courtroom. They are the judge, witness, prosecutor, the jury, clerk of court, court reporter, bailiff, defendant, defense counsel, and spectators or press. These roles make up the courtroom work group. All of these roles together help ensure the procedures of the criminal justice systems are being followed and carried out.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [ 3 ]. David Brown et al, Criminal Laws: Material and commentary on Criminal Law and Process of New South Wales, 5th Ed, Sydney, The Federation Press, 2011 p. 143…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schedule

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The walls were a dull brown color and most of the furniture was wooden. The Judge sat on a little stand and next to the stand was a seat where people would go to present evidence or tell stories under oath. On the Judge’s right side, there were two rows of seats that the Jury would sit in. There were police officer standing in the room and people sitting down in the audience like me. I couldn’t tell if they were just spectators in the audience, or family/friends of the people on trial.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a number of individuals who make up the courtroom personnel. Each individual whether it be the judge, bailiff, court reporter, courtroom clerk, prosecutor, defense counsel, jury, defendant, or witness contribute to the shaping of legal law. The judge who presides over the trial has the ultimate authority in the courtroom. “The judge must see that the trail is conducted in an orderly manner according to prescribed rules and laws covering the selection of the jury, the presentation of evidence, the arguments of the lawyers, the instructions to the jury, and the rending of the verdict” (Arizona Judicial Branch, 2013, para. 1). Although the judge has the ultimate authority in the courtroom the bailiff is tasked with keeping order during trial or hearings. The bailiff announces entry of the judge, supervises the jury, and calls witnesses…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Paper

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal court system made up of three levels: U.S. district courts, U.S. courts of appeal, and the U.S. Supreme court. U.S. district courts are the trial courts of the federal system and are located principally in larger cities. Federal decided only those cases over which the Constitution gives them authority. In the federal court system the highest court is the U.S. Supreme court which is located in the state of Washington, D.C. Supreme courts only hears cases on appeal from lower courts.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sentencing judge found that it was established beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, after finding out that Flick was pregnant, that the course of terminating the offspring by any means in his power, either consensual or otherwise was going to be taken and was part of his thought process during the course of Flicks pregnancy up to the events on the 20th of August 2002. Mens Rea in this case concerning a guilty mind in regards to King has been proven by the actions that led to the assault. It has been stated before the court that King sought an abortion upon the beginning of the pregnancy, determining his disagreement towards the life of the child, and his outlook towards the future of the pregnancy, also being emphasised during his conversations involving Jessica Williams and Brianne McCarthy offering them a payment of $500.00 if they would ‘bash’ Flick as long as it resulted in the death of the baby. His honour concluded that this course of actions was evident in his previous actions, therefore proving a guilty mind.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics