Preview

Court Observation Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1172 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Observation Paper
Court Observation The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any dispute against them rises. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many. In the Session Court that I attended, the appearance of the court was similar to other courts that I have seen. The judge sat in the center and in the presence of everyone at the front. The interpreter sat in front of the judge and on the right hand side was the witness or victim box and to the left was where the defendant was sat. A police officer was placed on the left side of the defendant to guard the public and those present in the court. There was a divider between where the public sits with those involved with the legal proceedings. As the judge entered the room everybody stood with respect.
On September 23, 2011 around 9:30 AM a fifty-six year old male dressed in a suit and tie entered the general sessions courtroom in Spartanburg, South Carolina accompanied by a police officer and was sat in the bench for the defendant. In the courtroom there was a judge, a defendant, a defense attorney and a police officer that charged the offender. There were no victims in this case. The court proceeding began by the solicitor reading out what the defendant was charged with and the details of the court process. The defendant was charged with possession of crack cocaine, and the attorney announced the defendant was pleading to discharge the fact of possession. The judge started the process by asking the defendant some background information about his family, personal drug

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within the U.S. each state has a court system with a lower court, an appellate court and a Supreme Court that functions similar to the Supreme Court of the U.S. Four levels exist within the State Court: The lower court also known as the court of limited Jurisdiction which represents the first level in which minor cases are seen. Citizens whom are accused of not paying parking fines, those accused of prostitution, DUI and those accused of disorderly conduct in public are also tried in this court.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * The two most common selection processes are merit selection and election. In the election process, it may expose a candidate to a partisan process. A popular election may also preclude a competent lawyer from getting the job. It is not necessarily lucrative to be a judge. Judge elections have their merits. It quickly asserts the will have the people. They empower the people with their values. Campaigns mean a lucrative practice presents interrupted (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Delliouse Case Summary

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Detective Mark Whatney arrested Defendant after finding cocaine in his Asheville, North Carolina home and the dead body of Donovan Delliouse in his trailer near that home. Defendant alleges that he has not been to his Asheville home in almost year, and he had a piano delivered to start taking piano lessons there. Furthermore, he claims he does not know Delliouse, he is unaware of any illegal activity at his Asheville home, and his trailer was used for storage. These events took place after Whatney received a call from Patricia, the ex-girlfriend of Defendant, on December 15, 2015 about Defendant’s drug activity. She wanted to help so she could possibly get her arson charges reduced, and she wanted justice for the Defendant’s past wrongs to her and her family. Earlier in the year, Defendant…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Respondent, Rodney Gant, was arrested for driving with a suspended license. Subsequent to the search of the Gant’s vehicle officers found cocaine in the back seat. At trial Gant moved to have the evidence suppressed denied that there was probable cause to search the vehicle, but did not decide to suppress the evidence. The court ruled the search to be that incident to an arrest. Respondent was found guilty and sentenced to three-year prison term.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    virginia v morre

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moore was charged with intent to sell crack cocaine. When Moore was first brought to trial, He filed a pretrial motion to attempt to suppress the evidence. He thought that he should not have had his vehicle searched without a warrant. From the original search and arrest he felt like his rights as a citizen had been violated. In Virginia they do not require suppression of evidence, which was obtained through the fourth amendment. When the trial court had it they discussed the option of suppressing the evidence, which would be being used against him in his trial, but denied the motion. The bench trial soon found him guilty of drug charges. Moore was sentenced to a Five-year prison term and one year and six months suspended sentence. The case went to a panel of Virginia’s intermediate court on the grounds of…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A court administrator is in charge of the day-to-day office duties that keep the courthouse smoothly running. These administrators need managerial and organizational skills in order to track information, manage processes and delegate tasks to employees. Court administrators work closely with judges and referees, but also supervise court staff who perform clerical and financial duties. Court administrators start out earning approximately $36,000 per year, but can end up making $96,000.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief People V Green

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: The defendant Vencil Green was charged and convicted of 12 felony offenses. The defendant used a gun to commit robbery and kidnaping for the purpose of robbery. At trial court the defendant presented expert testimony that the defendant’s history of heavy usage of PCP and other illicit drugs that has affected his brain and his ability to have committed the alleged crimes with intent, the trial judge rejected the defense.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargain

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief: Respondent was arrested and charged with possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 84 Stat. 1260. On October 17, 1991, respondent and his attorney asked to meet with the prosecutor to discuss the possibility of cooperating with the Government. At the beginning of the meeting, the prosecutor informed respondent that he had no obligation to talk, but that if he wanted to cooperate, he would have to be completely truthful. As a condition of proceeding with the discussion, the prosecutor indicated that the respondent would have to agree that any statements he made could be used to impeach any contradictory testimony he might give at trial if it went that far. Respondent conversed with his counsel and agreed to proceed under the prosecutor’s conditions. The respondent admitted to knowing that the package he attempted to sell to the undercover cop did contain methamphetamine. Respondent claimed that he did not know Shuster was manufacturing methamphetamine at his residence and later confessed that he did know of Shuster manufacturing methamphetamine in his residence. Respondent minimized his role in Shuster’s methamphetamine operation by claiming that he had not visited Shuster’s residence for at least a week before his arrest. The government showed the respondent surveillance evidence showing that his car was at Shuster’s residence the day before the arrest. The meeting ended on the basis that the respondent failed to provide completely truthful information. Respondent was tried on the methamphetamine charges and took the stand at his own defense. He maintained that he was not involved in the methamphetamine trafficking and he had thought Shuster was using his home laboratory to make plastic explosives for the CIA. He denied knowing that the package he delivered to the…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Courtroom Clerk’s job is to document what happens in a case, orders that are made by the court during the trial, and the verdict at the end of the trial. The courtroom clerk also administers the oath or affirmation to all jurors and witnesses before they testify. They also mark all exhibits and evidence that is…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Observation Paper

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Courtney Lee, a 20-year-old woman, the defendant in this case, was charged with first degree felony for two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a 13-year-old boy , a minor, she was dating. The initial bond was set at $5000 for each count, under the compulsory condition that she not be allowed around any minors. The case was taken back to court because the defendant dishonored the mandate of her release by being…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Testimony

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hello judges, jurors, and everyone else present in this court room today. My name is Dr. Alyssa Diaz and I am an expert witness. I was called here to testify on this court case. Also I am here to inform you how examining a piece of hair from a suspect from a crime can help to find out who actually did commit the crime. There are some basic things that people should know about hair.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this service learning project I went downtown first to the Daley center, then to the Circuit Court of Cook County. While there, I observed various criminal court cases, most which dealt with domestic violence and abuse. There was one particular case that stuck out to me the most. Torense Arnold vs.Latrarice Johnson was the second criminal case, with the man being the defendant against charges of domestic battery, burglary, and felony. Latrice Johnson had described her brutal relationship with Torense as an abusive obsession in which she wanted to get out of. She had been dragged by her hair throughout their house and had nail marks on her hands and face. Torence then pleaded guilty and was held at a 150,000 dollar bond, Latrice was issued an order of protection against him and her siblings.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Court Restraining

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I went to Judge Kellogg’s courtroom; he was doing arraignments. He had a hearing with a defendant wanting to file for probation and wanting to enlist in a drug program. Judge Kellogg’s response to him being in drug program was, drug programs are for credit not for the individual. Judge Kellogg disagreed in putting him in a drug program. Additionally, that he was going to give him more time in jail. The additional time was due to the defendant bringing in drugs and paraphernalia into the drug program. The Judge told him he needs to makes changes in his life and told him a story about his…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics