Preview

Court Observation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1052 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Observation
WRITING AN ACADEMIC BOOK REVIEW

Writing a book review may be an unfamiliar exercise, it is not as complex a task as writing an essay requiring a lot of library research. It is, however, not the same as a book review in The Age, which is written for the general reader.

Your book review is written for a reader (your lecturer or tutor) who is knowledgeable in the discipline and is interested not just in the coverage and content of the book being reviewed, but also in your critical assessment of the ideas and argument that are being presented by the author.

The review should not be a summary of the book. Instead it should state what the book sets out to do and assess how well the author achieves that goal. Your review might therefore be guided by the following questions:

|Objectives |What does the book set out to do? |
|Theory |Is there an explicit theoretical framework? If not, are there important theoretical assumptions? |
|Concepts |What are the central concepts? Are they clearly defined? |
|Argument |What is the central argument? Are there specific hypotheses? |
|Method |What methods are employed to test these? |
|Evidence |Is evidence provided? How adequate is it? |
|Values

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When writing the review keep in mind the following questions: What is the author’s purpose in writing the book? (Consult the forward, preface, epilogue, and conclusion as well as the text of the book).…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A critique of the book is included. The critique includes questions that the author should have addressed/considered. It should be about 1 page.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is a great assignment for those who are computer savvy. This assignment has 2 parts – the book review blog/wiki…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP World Extra Credit

    • 3394 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Write a minimum of a four-paragraph review only if you read it in its entirety. In the first paragraph, begin with…

    • 3394 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observsation

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Xander Barden and Katelyn Lippa are the defendant’s (O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs) representatives they are recommending the Court present an outline verdict to the bartender, John Daniels and O’Malley’s Tavern. There is definite understanding and helpful information defined in the Indiana Dream Shop Act which contains useful knowledge. Mr. Edward Hard did not participate or take on any behavior or actions that provided proof of intoxication. Debora White, the Plaintiff is in search of compensation from the defendants, O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs with the theory that Mr. Patrick Gibbs had concrete awareness of Mr. Edward Hard’s consumption of alcohol. (I.C. 7.1-5-10-15.5, 1996) cites that Mr. Gibbs the defendant have actual knowledge of the person being intoxicated before damages are allowed to be awarded. Practical awareness does not persuade the hindrance nor does individual awareness. Indirect evidence doesn’t support practical awareness only actual knowledge. Individual awareness can sustain the intrusion whereas actual knowledge has to carry through and support the intrusion. Observable dealings with the recognizable events of intoxication are prejudiced according to the 7th Indiana State Circuit Court. In the Supreme Court statue stated prior to the year 1988 common law tolerated practical awareness for intrusions and caused a change in the law for this not to be supported.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    history 7a

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PAPERS: You will be required to write two three-to-five page BOOK REVIEWS (not book reports!) based on a book you have read (Please refer to the accompanying bibliography). Please choose a book on a topic that interests you and read it. More information will follow.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Puritan Dilemma

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I wouldn't recommend this book to the average reader. It is a bit hard to read because the author goes into so much depth that the reader could very often forget the main idea. It is a good, informative book but a bit drawn out.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Also mentioned will be a number of theories and concepts, here is a few brief definitions of those mentioned in this essay.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secret Scripture

    • 3021 Words
    • 13 Pages

    A good discussion tends to start with our “heads” and end with our “hearts.” Therefore, you may want to save subjective opinions of taste until after you have discussed the more objective elements of this work. It is tempting to begin with, “What did everyone think?” But if a number of people really didn’t like the novel, their opinions may derail a discussion of the novel’s…

    • 3021 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory and Points

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assumptions - List explicit and implicit assumptions (values/beliefs) underlying the theory. On what assumptions does the theory build? (10 points)…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Observation Paper

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Courtney Lee, a 20-year-old woman, the defendant in this case, was charged with first degree felony for two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a 13-year-old boy , a minor, she was dating. The initial bond was set at $5000 for each count, under the compulsory condition that she not be allowed around any minors. The case was taken back to court because the defendant dishonored the mandate of her release by being…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this service learning project I went downtown first to the Daley center, then to the Circuit Court of Cook County. While there, I observed various criminal court cases, most which dealt with domestic violence and abuse. There was one particular case that stuck out to me the most. Torense Arnold vs.Latrarice Johnson was the second criminal case, with the man being the defendant against charges of domestic battery, burglary, and felony. Latrice Johnson had described her brutal relationship with Torense as an abusive obsession in which she wanted to get out of. She had been dragged by her hair throughout their house and had nail marks on her hands and face. Torence then pleaded guilty and was held at a 150,000 dollar bond, Latrice was issued an order of protection against him and her siblings.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 10th, I had the opportunity to go to the SF Immigration court on Montgomery Street with a few of my colleagues. I expected the court to be in a standalone building but instead it was spread over two floors in a twenty-five-floor building. The security checks for entering into the court were moderate. Everyone trying to enter the court had to go through a general security check where they walk through a metal detector machine and have their bags go through the x-ray machine. Before we went through the security check, we had to inform the officer on duty that we came to observe the court. Surprisingly I didn’t have to show a state I.D. before entering the court. After clearing the security check, the officer helped us find a courtroom to observe. I was expecting the officers to be harsh and not very helpful but I was surprised and glad to see that all of the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. A literature review on the previous studies of the story by critics is a must, so that you can find the features and limitations of their studies, and then decide on your own aspect of study.…

    • 5284 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays