An individual’s work achievement can be best predicted by measuring their intelligence. Discuss.
In modern life, the motive to success in career has been researched in order to benefit both individual and organisation. The term “intelligence” has been acknowledged over the world as a common way to compare between individual people. Majority believe that succeed of every people can be best measured in that way. However, after many year of using that, some people argue intelligence is not the best way to show how good in work people are. They figure out other ways of measuring success of worker. So does intelligence measurement method make the best prediction for work achievement? This essay is going to discuss about methods for determining an individual’s work outcome for every body clear about that.
Before discussing about career success and measurement, there is some knowledge that people should know. As everyone knows ‘intelligence’ is used all over the world but in fact, what intelligence is?
As it was mentioned in Principle of Organisation Behaviour (2005), “intelligence” can be classified as: Pure speed which is the speed of process for simple information, choice speed which is an ability to make a choice, speed of lexical access is the time taken for retrieving information from long-term memory, speed of reasoning processes is speed at higher order information processing. Career is a general course of action or conduct in life, or in a particular part or calling in life, or in some special undertaking; usually applied to course or conduct which is of a public character (1913 Webster). Success is the accomplishment of an aim or purpose. The other meaning of that is the attainment of fame, wealth, or social status (Oxford dictionary 1998). So, career success could be defined as achieving the goal of work. For an individual, goal of works are difference for example some people want to do their normal jobs, some want to do better than others in order to be promoted. In general, the work achievement that managers want to define can be understood as how good the work could be done.
The measurement of intelligence is the way they get score to compare between people. Nevertheless, how they calculate the score of one thing that cannot be seen. Charles Spearman explores the “G” number which is the score related to intelligent. Many psychologists broke out the “G” into many parts such as Schmidt and Hunter (1998), Sir Cyril Burt and Thurstone (1938). These primary factors were identified which we would nowadays known as: Spatial ability, verbal reasoning, perceptual speed, numerical ability, memory, verbal fluency, inductive reasoning.
The basis education in the UK during 1944 to 1971, the found that school education could be determined at the age of 11 by seeing intelligence test score. Actually, it is usually argued that intelligence is the best single predictor of scholastic achievement (Gottfredson, 2002; Kuncel, Hezlett, & Ones, 2004). Commonly, many organisations believe an ability of individual can be forecasted from an intelligence test score. Moreover, occupational status that is foundation form of achievement can be predicted by individual’s intelligence.
Individuals are different. The same work might have difference result due to difference of method. As being describe in definition, intelligence has been known as the speed of dealing with problem. People who work faster and more efficiency can be more successful at work so that intelligence is an important part of working-achieve judgement.
Beside that, intelligent people have more advantage of learning new thing than others. For example, they can find the new way of getting thing done rather than work under supervisor’s order.
Intelligence has impacts on education, job performance and income. Because the more intelligences people have, the better they can achieve in education. That also...
Bibliography: 1. Andrisani, P.J. and Nestel, G. (1976), Internal external control as contributor to and outcome of work experience, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 156-65.
2. Brockner, J. (1988), Self-esteem at Work, Lexington Books, MA.
3. Hamid, P.N. (1994), Self-monitoring, locus of control, and social encounters of Chinese and New Zealand students, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 353-68.
4. Intelligence International Society for Intelligence Research (2008) Volume 36, issues 1 and Volume 35, issues 3(2007)
6. Lennox, R.D. and Wolfe, R.N. (1984), Revision of the self-monitoring scale ' ', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 46, pp. 1349-64.
8. Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations Westport, CT: Praeger.
9. The Oxford Dictionary of English (1998) Oxford University Press
11. Spiro, R. and Weitz, B. (1990), Adaptive selling: conceptualization, measurement and nomological validity, Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 61-9.
12. Victor P. Lau and Margaret A. Shaffer Career success: the effects of personality Career Development International (1999) pg. 225-230. MCB University Press
Please join StudyMode to read the full document