Preview

Counting In Sevens Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
979 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Counting In Sevens Analysis
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani made his case Thursday to the American people and the world for "a constructive approach" to contentious issues including his nation 's nuclear program, arguing that failing to engage "leads to everyone 's loss."

"We must work together to end the unhealthy rivalries and interferences that fuel violence and drive us apart," Rouhani said in an op-ed published Thursday evening on the Washington Post 's website.

It 's not the first time a leader from a country often at podds with the United States has used its newspapers to convey his or her views. Just last week, for instance, Russian President Vladimir Putin argued against international military intervention in Syria and jabbed his U.S. counterpart for saying Americans should consider themselves "exceptional" -- a remark that quickly elicited derision from across the U.S. political spectrum.

But Rouhani 's tone differed from Putin 's, echoing the theme of "prudence and hope" and the promise of more positive engagement with the rest of the world that helped propel him to an election win in June.

"To move beyond impasses, ... we need to aim higher," he said. "Rather than focusing on how to prevent things from getting worse, we need to think -- and talk -- about how to make things better."

Contending "the age of blood feuds" and the idea of diplomacy as a "zero-sum game" no longer apply in a "changed" world, Rouhani said leaders should engage each other "on the basis of equal footing and mutual respect."
My approach to foreign policy seeks to resolve ... issues by addressing their underlying causes," he said. "We must work together to end the unhealthy rivalries and interferences that fuel violence and drive us apart."

Chief among those issues, for Iran, is its nuclear program. Iranian officials have insisted its aim is peaceful and for energy purposes only, but skeptical U.S., Israeli and other officials accuse Tehran of working to develop nuclear weapons. Iran 's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am reading Counting By 7's by Holly Goldberg Sloan. In this novel we are introduced to a highly intelligent girl named Willow Chance, who lives in Bakersfield with her adoptive parents. She was always considered "gifted" from the beginning. She is about to start in a new school and hopes to make friends and "fit in". Willow takes her Standardized Test but is accused of cheating because she completed the test in only 17 minutes.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cornell W. Clayton argues that rather than addressing incivility, Americans should focus on the “substantive sources of political conflict”. This would change the entire tone of the conversation because there would be no incivility mentioned in his essay. Most of his essay is showing the reader about the incivilities that had happened in the past. Clayton informs the reader that incivility can be ended, and Americans should focus on causes of division today because it will effect the future. The tone of the conversation would be very different. It would be more positive than negative because there will be solutions for causes of divisions. He writes, “I dislike uncivil behavior, and I believe it says more about the louts who engage in it than…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 11, 2013, Vladimir Putin presented his viewpoint concerning the United States involvement with the country of Syria in the form of an article, respectfully titled, "A Plea for Caution From Russia." The opinion piece, which was submitted to The New York Times, makes an attempt to address the actions of the United States. Putin meticulously creates his argument by utilizing three fundamental methods of persuasion; these three methods incorporate ethos, pathos, and logos. Putin 's proficiency to include these methods when directing the citizens of American is impeccable. He…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    community, we need to take a closer look at Iranian politics to understand how and by…

    • 1773 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ahmadinejad is cautious with the Obama proposal. He sees the move as a public relations move by America to absolve them of any fault. This is to the extent that if Iran does not agree to Obama 's terms, then, America is justified in issuing stricter sanctions (Nick, 2009)…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s Inaugural Address best relates to current day 2016 in that it emphasizes on how we must keep good connections with our opponents and allies. For instance, the threat of ISIS affects many countries but by uniting allies together to oppose the aggression of ISIS and by negotiating with adversaries, we can formulate a more united world to ensure a more peaceful and stronger society. Unity is essential in guaranteeing that a nation will continue to thrive, however division will only create antagonistic tensions that can threaten to tear the nation…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, there must be a solution that can pave the way toward the most flourishing nation. We recently read several articles describing the issues to why U.S. is divided. The authors that discuss the division are Lauren Griffin and Annie Neimand in their article “No one Wants to be wrong: Why Each Side of the Partisan Divide Think the Other is Living in an Alternate Reality,” Trevor Noah in his piece “Let’s Not Be Divided. Divided People Are Easier to Rule,” Bob Herbert’s “Hiding From Reality,” (What’s Up With the American Dream?) as well as Conor Friedersdorf’s “Making Up Is Hard to Do,” and Filippo Menczer ‘s “Misinformation on social media--can technology save us?” There are many things that play a significant role in making the divide in our country such as politics, social media, and the different viewpoint of people, but also there may be some solutions that can pave the way and close the gap…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My mother has told me since I was a child, “Conversation before confrontation. You must use your words to solve differences before violence.” That saying has always stuck with me since the first time I heard it. In keeping it close to my heart, I have grown to live by those words. Before any source of conflict can arise, I take the pacifist route to try and solve differences instead of letting hate overcome a more peaceful direction.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Princeton University (2006) defines diplomatic negotiations as between nations. The lesson learned by the Americans was the need to communicate with their enemy. Our military leaders and president, Lyndon Johnson, used bombing as “verbal” negotiations with Vietnam. Neither the Americans nor the Vietnamese were willing to compromise and enter into discussions. This refusal to enter into talks led to millions of deaths. The Vietnam War could have been avoided entirely or ended much sooner had the negotiations taken place.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before I go any farther, I want to preface my paper with a disclaimer or two. First, I personally do not believe that Iran, as it currently stands, should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Iran’s rulers are religious extremists, and they pose a serious threat to the western world. However, I will strive to present an unbiased review of the issue. Secondly, this paper is not meant to be an exhaustive examination of the topic of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. I am a college freshman at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and I wrote this paper for my English 111 class. As such, I had a very limited time period in which I could research Iran and nuclear…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The year of 2014 has proven to be that no president gets a free pass when it comes to difficult international decisions. Over the last term and a half, the Obama administration really has been picking up the disruptions of the Middle East right where Bush left them while simultaneously being dealt with more issues of diplomacy. The occurrences involving Ukraine and Syria have, in opinion, shown the current administrations true colors. It is the prime example of the realism ideology and the contrast between “hard” and “soft” power. In both situations, Obama has shown great reluctance in putting to use the American military. Although tens of thousands Syrians have been murdered and Ukraine has been under direct attack from Russia, present administration has moved from the “hard power” that killed Osama bin Laden and essentially ended the war in Iraq to a potential isolationist. However, as some could argue, like Stephan M. Walt, “foreign policy is not philanthropy.” Unless allies have direct benefits for the United States, perhaps the nation has no business jumping to the rescue (Walt). In other words, America is once again bringing focus back to the home front and has the potential of taking a more realist approach to foreign policy than ever before. If the nation truly does not want to look out for the interest of fellow democratic states simply because it…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As president of the United States of America, you must be able to balance both domestic policy and foreign policy. Domestic policy consists of the problems and situations that directly affect the country. However, foreign policy consists of the problems that concern both the government’s own country as well as foreign countries to solve problems and potential problems. The United States’ first three presidents (George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson) were forced to set the pace and create an example of how to balance both policies for future presidents. Because these presidents really didn’t have any previous examples to follow, they had to figure the situation out for themselves, which clearly shows in each president’s successes and failures in balancing foreign policy with domestic policy.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, what is been done well is the initial agreement for there to be a negotiation and also the fact that there is no threat of violence so far. Another is the total availability of information to the general public as to what is happening in the negotiation for it is the people of Iran and the rest of the world who are the “hidden parties”. What I feel is not good is the stereotype of the US being bad fate negotiators and the Congress using coercive power to bully the Iranians with threats of putting up new sanctions (Karimi & Walsh,…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays