Preview

Counter Arguments To Nozick's Entitlement Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1321 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Counter Arguments To Nozick's Entitlement Theory
: Introduction Robert Nozick was one of the most influential political philosophers of his time, and his book “Anarchy, State and Utopia," has become a modern classic. His theories, especially the entitlement theory, have become the foundation for the Libertarian Political Party and the discussion of numerous modern philosophers to date. The entitlement theory is a core feature of Nozick’s entire ideology. This essay will be broken up into four parts. I will start off by presenting a detailed exposition of Nozick’s theory. I will continue, in the next section, by providing counter arguments to Nozick’s theory. The third section I aim to refute the objections to Nozick’s entitlement theory. In the final section, I will finish with what I believe …show more content…
According to Nozick, at least two conditions must be met in order to justify any sort of individual holdings. The first condition that needs to be maintained, is the right to self ownership. To demonstrate this condition, Nozick compares the rights we have over ourselves, to the legal rights a slaveholder holds over his slave. To summarize, a slave owner posses the legal property rights over his slave, and he has a right to utilize his slave in any way he wants. He has this right, as long as he is not violating the rights of another person. Alternatively, regardless of the situation, no other person may employ the service of the slave, nor may another person force the slave to do something without the voluntary consent of the slaveholder. Any service acquired from the slave that did not follow from the direct permission of the slaveholder, would violate the rights the slaveholder has over his slave. In the same sense, people have the moral right over their bodies. They may exploit their bodies in any way they see fit, as long as they do not violate others rights. In addition, no one can coerce or force a person into using their body without their consent; doing so would violate their rights of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory explains that people are entitled to their belongings only if they obtained…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In American society, freedom and government go hand-in-hand. Whether through coercion or by their own accord, Americans agree to limit their freedom in exchange for the protection and order provided by the government. While Hayek argues for spontaneous order, the natural process by which society comes together, Nozick believes in the idea of minimal and ultraminimal states in which the government’s role is to protect the rights of a society.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to our text there are three basic principles that are the basis for Nozicks entitlement theory. The first of these states that a person who acquires a holding, in according with the principle of justice, in acquisition is entitled to that holding (Shaw & Barry, p.114).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Right to Healthcare?

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Debates about justice and fair allocation have implications for the idea of a right to healthcare. In this context a “right” is understood as an entitlement to some measure of health care; rights are contrasted with privileges, ideals, and acts of charity.…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * Legal entitlements which allow everyone to live safely in their society, despite their differences, without fear of being discriminated against or attacked…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Murray, L. (2011, March). Freedom from Want. Reader 's Digest, 178(1064), 106. Retrieved August 7, 2011, from Research Library. (Document ID: 2279331791).…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall’s (1950) theory of citizenship has been discussed and criticised widely as this is where the basis of the concept of citizenship lies. He divided citizenship into three parts. Firstly the civil component, which includes the ‘freedom of speech, the right to own property and the right to justice’ (Marshall 1950 cited in Turner 2003:189). This component is necessary for the achievement of individual freedom. Secondly is the political element; ‘constituted by the rights to participate in the exercise of political power, in particular the rights to free elections and a secret ballot’ (Turner 2003:190). And finally the social component as the right to ‘a modicum of economic welfare and security to the right to share to the full in the social heritage and to live the life of a civilized being’ (Marshall 1950 cited in Turner 2003:190). Marshall further argues that tension has developed in society because of an increasing need for economic profitability, the taxation requirements and the rights of citizens to welfare provisions (Turner 1990). However his theory has been criticised by writers who argue that his argument is complacent and conservative (Roche cited in Turner 1999:192). On the other hand Taylor 2001 uses Aristotle’s notion of citizenship. Taylor maintains that Aristotle recognised that the success and fate of democracy depended upon the quality of its citizens, although…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Age Of Reason Dbq Essay

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Age of reason a thinker named John Locke declared that all individuals have the right to be involved in government. “The people are at liberty to provide for themselves,by erecting a new legislative [law making body],...for the society can never ...lose the native [natural]and original right to preserve…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anarchism, not in the sense of lawlessness, but in the sense of noninterventionist governmental policy and activity, has a colorful history in the United States. It has enjoyed periods of welcoming and periods of scorn by every class of people and for widely varied reasons. It is embraced by free market economists and by the socially liberal, favored in part by both major parties and wholly endorsed by the Libertarian Party in the U.S. today. In the past, its place has been substantially different, for at different periods of time, different policies and mindsets on the parts of the citizens and the government have been at the forefront of progressive thought. Whether it is considered novel, conservative, beneficial, or detrimental is all dependent on a large array of contemporary social and economic considerations.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Obama called widening income inequality the “defining challenge of our time”. The political firestorm created from perceived economic inequality is an increasingly vexing problem in the United States. The belief, that the richest citizens use their power and privilege by abusing the most vulnerable with impunity, as think tank philosophers feed mob rule passions for equality through “divide and conquer” Machiavellianism. Consequently, allowing the government and wealthy individuals to subvert the republican government by maneuvering regulations narrowly towards oligarchic or autocratic directions. Ultimately, delivering economic wealth to corporate or even foreign powers. What is the basic, the essential, the crucial principle that differentiates freedom from slavery? Derek Thompson’s Barack Obama, Inequality Fighter feeds the Baconian type notion that income inequality is purely factual while dismissing the economic freedom principle of voluntary action over regulatory coercion.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not today’s youth has really become the Entitlement Generation has been the focus of many debates over the past couple years. Those born in the mid 80’s and 90’s give off an aura of entitlement and this has raised many questions, including where is this idea coming from? Most believe it comes from the values and principles we were taught as children; however, some argue that the Entitlement Generation is learning their lesson. The great recession we are currently experiencing is teaching American teens to spend les, save more, and appreciate what they are given. The sense of entitlement is seen in many places, but mainly the workplace. New comers to jobs are asking for high pay and more…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both John Rawls and Robert Nozick have made major contributions to modern political philosophy. Rawls’ most successful philosophical work, “A Theory of Justice,” has helped construct both modern liberal and social democratic concepts of social justice. On the other hand, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, Nozick’s most successful philosophical work, constructs a form of libertarianism traditionally associated with John Locke and other philosophers prescribed to individual rights and freedoms. Evidently, both philosophers exhibit two highly distinct political philosophies. One major difference between the two philosophies is the legitimacy of governmental redistribution of wealth. As a result, Rawls and Nozick are at two opposite ends of the political…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Rights Theory

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper, I will make a number of arguments against the human right to social and economic welfare. In particular, I will examine Henry Shue 's defense of subsistence and illustrate why I find his reasoning ineffective. The first point I will make in this paper is that socio-economic welfare rights cannot be human rights because they are not universal. Thereafter, I will argue against two thoughts proposed by Henry Shue in Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy. I will first argue, in direct contradiction to Shue, that human rights are only negative, and that subsistence rights are inherently positive; therefore subsistence rights cannot be human rights. Finally, I will argue the idea that socio-economic welfare programs are not practical with respect to the scarcity of resources.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays